https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jan 10 18:06:43 2016
New Revision: 232203
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232203&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-10 Paul Thomas
Backport from mainline.
PR fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 15 14:07:52 2015
New Revision: 230396
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230396&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-15 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/50221
PR fortran/68216
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
I had a devil of a job fixing the second testcase, from "Blockbuster", in the
clf thread above:
program testdefchar
implicit none
character(:), allocatable :: test(:)
allocate(character(3) :: test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I think that a meta-bug would be an excellent idea.
It is pr68241.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Paul, I'm delighted than someone is finally working on this long-standing
> problem.
Seconded!
> I hope you're also taking a look at all the other related PRs that Dominique
> pointed out; I suspec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216
--- Comment #5 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
Paul, I'm delighted than someone is finally working on this long-standing
problem. I hope you're also taking a look at all the other related PRs that
Dominique pointed out; I suspect that the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216
--- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Dear Dominique,
I think that a meta-bug would be an excellent idea. I am 5
regressions away from a fix for this PR. I'll get the patch to you
over the weekend.
Many thanks for your s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Oops! read pr55735 instead of pr57735.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
If this help, I have found the following PRs related to deferred-length:
pr49630, pr49954, pr50221, pr54070, pr55735, pr57735, pr57910, pr63932,
pr65677, pr66408, and pr67674. Will it worth opening a "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
11 matches
Mail list logo
