https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> I've committed a version of your patch, which I hope will fix all the
> problems.
> Please let me know if not.
I've just bootstrapped with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Sat Mar 9 02:10:22 2019
New Revision: 269521
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269521&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/89447
syscall, internal/syscall: adjust use of la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
[...]
> Do you have https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg01332.html too?
I have a similar patch from Ian, otherwise results are way wors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
FWIW, after this patch and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg01815.html
only the runtime failures mentioned there and go/build (which times out
after 4 minutes, just as it d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89447
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 45796
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45796&action=edit
Initial patch