https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081
--- Comment #4 from jbeulich at suse dot com ---
Turns out I was wrong here, and the re-ordering was done even by older than gcc
9. The move from 9.2 to 9.3 also included a move to a newer gas, which made the
issue noticable.
Feel free to close a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020, jbeulich at suse dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081
>
> --- Comment #2 from jbeulich at suse dot com ---
> I wasn't even aware of -fno-topleve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081
--- Comment #2 from jbeulich at suse dot com ---
I wasn't even aware of -fno-toplevel-reorder, this suffices as a workaround
here. Thanks.
If nevertheless you're still interested in a testcase, please let me know; for
the moment I'll assume this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
