--- Comment #34 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-05 10:14 ---
This bug seems to be fixed then, if there are unrelated AIX or HPUX libjava
testsuite failures, please file separate bugs for them.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #33 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-05 10:06 ---
Subject: Bug 37068
Author: aph
Date: Wed Nov 5 10:05:03 2008
New Revision: 141604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141604
Log:
2008-11-04 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR java/37068
--- Comment #35 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-11-05
13:40 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
This bug seems to be fixed then, if there are unrelated AIX or HPUX
--- Comment #36 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-05 14:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect
library ABI version detected
ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de wrote:
After rebuilding jc1 and rerunning the libjava testsuite on
alpha-dec-osf5.1b,
--- Comment #37 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-11-05
15:07 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected
aph at redhat dot com writes:
Feel free to CC me with any of these.
Thanks. A considerable number of them
--- Comment #38 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-05 15:45 ---
I think the AIX testsuite problem is a problem with the testsuite harness. If
I compile a trivial Java program with gcj, it works. If I manually compile
programs from libjava.lang testsuite, they work. If I manually
--- Comment #24 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-04 16:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect
library ABI version detected
mark at codesourcery dot com wrote:
You shouldn't call that function. Instead, you should set
--- Comment #25 from dje dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-11-04 18:11 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected
This patch works on x86_64 GNU/Linux.
Please HP/UX, AIX, and OSF users make sure it works for them as well.
I
--- Comment #26 from dje dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-11-04 18:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected
The runtime failure has changed and no longer is complaining about ABI
versions on AIX. As I mentioned, I will be
--- Comment #27 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-04 18:16 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect
library ABI version detected
dje dot gcc at gmail dot com wrote:
--- Comment #25 from dje dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-11-04 18:11
---
--- Comment #28 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-04 18:19 ---
So I take it that the libgcj linkage failure is fixed, but some other unrelated
bug now occurs? Sounds like this one needs to be closed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37068
--- Comment #29 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-04 18:33 ---
So I take it that the libgcj linkage failure is fixed, but some other
unrelated
bug now occurs? Sounds like this one needs to be closed.
No. linkage failure does not mean a link-edit failure. It always has been
--- Comment #30 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-04
19:01 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected
That error now is gone, but we may only have stepped to the next error on
these
platforms. We can decide
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #31 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-04 23:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect
library ABI version detected
dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote:
--- Comment #30 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-04
--- Comment #32 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-05
01:11 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected
OK, but I need to know if my patch has been tested well enough for
me to check it in. I'm fairly certain it
--- Comment #15 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-03
14:27 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected
Does this cause a bootstrap failure anywhere, or just testsuite regressions
and
(ignored) gcj-dbtool
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37068
--- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-03
15:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected
--- Comment #13 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 10:18 ---
As a Java maintainer I'm happy
--- Comment #14 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 11:54 ---
Does this cause a bootstrap failure anywhere, or just testsuite regressions and
(ignored) gcj-dbtool failure? If the latter, this should be P4.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37068
--- Comment #18 from aph at redhat dot com 2008-11-03 15:12 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect
library ABI version detected
dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote:
--- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-03
--- Comment #13 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 10:18 ---
As a Java maintainer I'm happy to have a look at this, but I have no access to
HP/UX hardware.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37068
--- Comment #16 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 14:45 ---
Indeed. If that doesn't work, libjava is hosed on that platform.
I'd like to get to the bottom of it. Should the FE be calling
cgraph_build_static_cdtor() or not?
--
--- Comment #19 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 17:35 ---
Characterizing this as testsuite failures trivializes the problem. libgcj
builds but does not work properly on the platforms. This PR should be
categorized as P2, not P4.
--
--- Comment #20 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 17:38
---
Do we still think this is Java-specific, or do we have any evidence that this
can happen in C/C++ as well?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 17:41 ---
Java is not a primary language, bugs that affect just Java and not C/C++
shouldn't be P1 or P2. Fortran FE bugs are P4 as well. That doesn't mean it
can't be fixed, just that the release will not be delayed because
--- Comment #22 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-03 17:47 ---
I think think this is Java-specific.
It's quite likely that the Java FE should not be calling
cgraph_build_static_cdtor(), but when that call is removed some test
cases fail. Rather than arguing what priority this
--- Comment #23 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2008-11-04 05:51 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect
library ABI version detected
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
It's quite likely that the Java FE should not be calling
--- Comment #9 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 16:18 ---
Breakpoint 1, cgraph_build_static_cdtor (which=-52 '?', body=0x400555d8,
priority=1074005676) at ../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1353
1353 sprintf (which_buf, %c_%.5d_%d, which, priority, counter++);
(gdb) bt
--- Comment #10 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-01
16:49 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure:
Incorrect library ABI version detected
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Possibly the attached change will fix the
--- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-02
02:33 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Possibly the attached change will fix the
--- Comment #6 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-31 17:18 ---
alpha-dec-osf5.1b (with the workarounds mentioned in PR bootstrap/37426) is
affected as well. _Jv_CheckABIVersion is invoked with 3221625473.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-10-31
19:50 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected
alpha-dec-osf5.1b (with the workarounds mentioned in PR bootstrap/37426) is
affected as well.
--- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-10-31
23:31 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected
It seems that when using collect2 the global constructor for libgcj
calls _Jv_RegisterClass more than once
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-10-30
23:27 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure:
Incorrect library ABI version detected
On AIX, _Jv_CheckABI is invoked with version argument of 0 instead of 404000
GCC version constant.
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-10-31
04:22 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected
Same on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
(gdb) bt
#0 _Jv_CheckABIVersion (value=0)
at
--- Comment #3 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-16 20:12 ---
I see the same failure on AIX that just restored Java support.
On AIX, _Jv_CheckABI is invoked with version argument of 0 instead of 404000
GCC version constant.
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 12:54 ---
Quite obviously :(
I will need some asistance here as I don't have HP-PA system and don't know
much about ISA either.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37068
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-10 19:55 ---
I want to say something is being miscompiled.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
40 matches
Mail list logo
