[Bug libfortran/34887] reverse tabbing before slash descriptor (regression vs. g77)

2008-01-26 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-26 15:24 --- Fixed on trunk. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/34887] reverse tabbing before slash descriptor (regression vs. g77)

2008-01-26 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-26 15:23 --- Subject: Bug 34887 Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Jan 26 15:22:59 2008 New Revision: 131864 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131864 Log: 2008-01-26 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR li

[Bug libfortran/34887] reverse tabbing before slash descriptor (regression vs. g77)

2008-01-26 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-26 08:52 --- am not convinced the if > (done) is needed at line 2579 though. Have to think some more. Maybe try > taking the condition away and see what happens. I don't think it's needed. I am currently testing a version w

[Bug libfortran/34887] reverse tabbing before slash descriptor (regression vs. g77)

2008-01-24 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-25 00:53 --- What it does is stated in the comment. /* If the farthest position reached is greater than current position, adjust the position and set length to pad out whats left. Otherwise just pad whats left. (for

[Bug libfortran/34887] reverse tabbing before slash descriptor (regression vs. g77)

2008-01-24 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-24 22:09 --- > This causes a regression in x_slash_1.f . I'll dig around > some more. There's something wrong here (as evidenced in the PR :-) In next_record_w, we should be following the path starting with if (done) every tim

[Bug libfortran/34887] reverse tabbing before slash descriptor (regression vs. g77)

2008-01-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 22:19 --- > - next_record (dtp, 0); > + next_record (dtp, 1); This causes a regression in x_slash_1.f . I'll dig around some more. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34887

[Bug libfortran/34887] reverse tabbing before slash descriptor (regression vs. g77)

2008-01-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 21:40 --- (currently regtesting) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34887

[Bug libfortran/34887] reverse tabbing before slash descriptor (regression vs. g77)

2008-01-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 21:39 --- What about this one-character patch? Index: transfer.c === --- transfer.c (revision 131679) +++ transfer.c (working copy) @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ forma

[Bug libfortran/34887] reverse tabbing before slash descriptor (regression vs. g77)

2008-01-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 20:18 --- Reduced test case: $ cat bug-4.f program main write (*,'(3X A, T1, A,/)') 'aa', 'bb' end $ gfortran bug-4.f && ./a.out bb $ g77 bug-4.f && ./a.out bb aa -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org chang