--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-13 21:13
---
> So this should be treated as a known latent bug, a testcase which fails or
> passes at random on targets requiring strict alignment? In which case
> there should be an effective-target keyword for strict align
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-13
20:39 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ext/array_allocator/2.cc
execution test fails on hppa64-hpux
On Fri, 13 May 2005, pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:
> Given our current basic_string implementation (which I'm m
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-13 20:16
---
Given our current basic_string implementation (which I'm maintaining) I can
tell you that this testcase is very brittle: see 19495, that lead to the
xfail for powerpc, for additional details. Benjamin's changes can
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-13 19:27
---
What was the purpose of applying this patch to 4.0 branch? Did it fix a
regression? I can't find this patch (looking for the ChangeLog entry test) in
my gcc-patches folders.
As the patch changes the testsui
