[Bug libstdc++/30586] [4.2/4.3 regression] Namespace pollution in c++ headers

2007-01-28 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-28 20:12 --- Subject: Bug 30586 Author: paolo Date: Sun Jan 28 20:12:40 2007 New Revision: 121271 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121271 Log: 2007-01-27 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libstdc++/30586] [4.2/4.3 regression] Namespace pollution in c++ headers

2007-01-28 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-01-28 20:23 --- Fixed. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/30586] [4.2/4.3 regression] Namespace pollution in c++ headers

2007-01-26 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 18:00 --- Subject: Bug 30586 Author: paolo Date: Fri Jan 26 18:00:42 2007 New Revision: 121209 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121209 Log: 2007-01-26 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libstdc++/30586] [4.2/4.3 regression] Namespace pollution in c++ headers

2007-01-26 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 18:03 --- Subject: Bug 30586 Author: paolo Date: Fri Jan 26 18:03:44 2007 New Revision: 121210 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121210 Log: 2007-01-26 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libstdc++/30586] [4.2/4.3 regression] Namespace pollution in c++ headers

2007-01-25 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-01-25 19:13 --- As far as I can see, in gcc4.0.x a special config/cpu/ia64/atomic_word.h already existed... and used, or otherwise something was broken, the file has been added with the below patch. As far as I can see, the

[Bug libstdc++/30586] [4.2/4.3 regression] Namespace pollution in c++ headers

2007-01-25 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-01-25 19:23 --- Humm, maybe the fix is very simple: apparently these days in the ia64 atomic_word.h we don't really need cxxabi.h, only cxxabi_tweaks.h, for __cxxabiv1::__guard. I'll give it a try... -- pcarlini at suse dot de

[Bug libstdc++/30586] [4.2/4.3 regression] Namespace pollution in c++ headers

2007-01-25 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #3 from schwab at suse dot de 2007-01-25 23:40 --- Yes, config/cpu/ia64/atomic_word.h already existed before 4.2, but it wasn't picked up until this: 2006-07-14 Benjamin Kosnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] * configure.host: Simplify. --

[Bug libstdc++/30586] [4.2/4.3 regression] Namespace pollution in c++ headers

2007-01-25 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-01-26 00:04 --- (In reply to comment #3) Yes, config/cpu/ia64/atomic_word.h already existed before 4.2, but it wasn't picked up until this: 2006-07-14 Benjamin Kosnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] * configure.host: Simplify. I see.

[Bug libstdc++/30586] [4.2/4.3 regression] Namespace pollution in c++ headers

2007-01-25 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-01-26 00:14 --- Disregard sparc in my previos post, was already ok, sorry. In summary, in 4_1-branch, additional entries are needed in the atomic_word_dir switch for alpha, ia64 and powerpc. --