--- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 18:21 ---
this is caused by the default argument to resize:
void
resize(size_type __new_size, value_type __x = value_type());
It would be possible to avoid the default construction by replacing that member
with two overloads
--- Comment #2 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 18:30 ---
On second thoughts, it might be necessary to split it into two overloads for
C++1x, because this should work:
#include vector
struct moveable {
explicit moveable(int) { }
moveable(const moveable) = delete;
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 18:33 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
It would be possible to avoid the default construction by replacing that
member
with two overloads of resize, but I'm not sure it's worth doing.
The C++03 standard only lists the
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 18:34 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
On second thoughts, it might be necessary to split it into two overloads for
C++1x, because this should work:
But std::vector::resize (size_type sz, T c = T()); is the only one listed at
--- Comment #5 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 18:37 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
On second thoughts, it might be necessary to split it into two overloads for
C++1x, because this should work:
Gah, ignore that, I'm talking rubbish and that shouldn't work
Andrew, the
