http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #6 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Hello,
Before reporting this to you I opened a Mesa bug where they suggested me to try
released version of GCC. Gcc-4.8.2 works for them with -flto=4. This report is
result of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
Markus Trippelsdorf octoploid at yandex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #8 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Thank you Markus.
Could you please tell me if binutils 2.24.51.0.2 are OK for this?
I will try AR=gcc-ar etc in the meantime.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf octoploid at yandex dot com ---
(In reply to David Kredba from comment #8)
Thank you Markus.
Could you please tell me if binutils 2.24.51.0.2 are OK for this?
Unfortunately not out of the box. I use the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf octoploid at yandex dot com ---
Created attachment 31437
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31437action=edit
binutils patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #11 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Hello Markus,
Thank you for your great support.
AS=gcc-as AR=gcc-ar NM=gcc-nm RANLIB=gcc-ranlib did it for me for mesa and I
will use it in problematic future cases.
And I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf octoploid at yandex dot com ---
(In reply to David Kredba from comment #11)
And I will try your binutils patch.
Do you think that for 4.9.0 GCC release binutils will support
slim-LTO-objects?
LTO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #2 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31433
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31433action=edit
gcc-4.8.2-64bit-build.log gzipped
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #3 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31434
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31434action=edit
gcc-4.8.2-32bit-build.log gzipped
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #1 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31432
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31432action=edit
gcc-4.8.2-32bit-config.log gzipped
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #5 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31436
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31436action=edit
32bit-config.log gzipped
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59505
--- Comment #4 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31435
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31435action=edit
Build.log gzipped
13 matches
Mail list logo