subject:"\[Bug middle\-end\/99299\] Need a recoverable version of __builtin

[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

2021-08-26 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

2021-06-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

2021-03-01 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- The i386 port has === (define_insn "trap" [(trap_if (const_int 1) (const_int 6))] "" { #ifdef HAVE_AS_IX86_UD2 return "ud2"; #else return ASM_SHORT "0x0b0f"; #endif } [(set_attr "length"

[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

2021-03-01 Thread sirl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 --- Comment #8 from Franz Sirl --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #7) > (In reply to Franz Sirl from comment #5) > > For the naming I suggest __builtin_debugtrap() to align with clang. Maybe > > with an aliased __debugbreak() on

[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

2021-03-01 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Franz Sirl from comment #5) > For the naming I suggest __builtin_debugtrap() to align with clang. Maybe > with an aliased __debugbreak() on Windows platforms. Those are terrible names.

[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

2021-03-01 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > I'm not sure what your proposed not noreturn trap() would do in terms of > IL semantics compared to a not specially annotated general call? Nothing I

[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

2021-03-01 Thread sirl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 Franz Sirl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sirl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

2021-03-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug middle-end/99299] Need a recoverable version of __builtin_trap()

2021-02-27 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Ah, thank you. Well except there is no keyword called that?