--- Comment #16 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-02 18:41
---
Subject: Bug 29639
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Nov 2 18:40:54 2006
New Revision: 118422
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118422
Log:
PR other/29639
* except.c (switch_to_ex
--- Comment #17 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-02 18:44
---
Should work now.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-11-03 00:29 ---
Thanks again for the quick fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29639
--- Comment #19 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-03 10:46 ---
Is this actually fixed?
Here are my current testresults:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-11/msg00094.html
Still shows breakage on FC6. Sorry, hardware constrained at the moment and
don't have other linuxe
--- Comment #20 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-11-03 11:28 ---
I can confirm that this specific regression disappeared for me. But I suspect
something also depends on the binutils version and other details, I'm using a
stock 2.17 on this machine...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--- Comment #21 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-03 11:58
---
> Is this actually fixed?
It is on my system, either x86_64-suse-linux -m64/-m32 or i586-suse-linux,
with binutils 2.17.
> Here are my current testresults:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-11/msg000
--- Comment #22 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-04 09:29 ---
ld --version
GNU ld version 2.17.50.0.3-6 20060715
But, I also tried this with --hash-style=sysv, and got the same results. I'll
try to figure out what's going on.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Comment #23 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-04 20:16
---
> ld --version
> GNU ld version 2.17.50.0.3-6 20060715
I cannot reproduce with binutils mainline:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/build/binutils/native32> ld/ld-new --version
GNU ld version 2.17.50 20061104
How are binutil
--- Comment #24 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-05 19:34
---
I'm seeing similar problems on hppa-linux. See PR 29661 for mor details.
There are some others as well that are probably dups.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #25 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-05 20:03
---
> I'm seeing similar problems on hppa-linux. See PR 29661 for mor details.
> There are some others as well that are probably dups.
With some exotic version of binutils too? :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #26 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-05
20:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] ext/bitmap_allocator/check_allocate_max_size.cc
execution test
> With some exotic version of binutils too? :-)
When I first hit the problem, I was using a build from last Ju
--- Comment #27 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-05 21:32
---
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++$ ld --version
> GNU ld version 2.17.50 20061031
OK, thanks. I'll try harder to reproduce on x86/Linux.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #28 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 12:25
---
> OK, thanks. I'll try harder to reproduce on x86/Linux.
This is getting annoying. I've built a first C++ compiler --with-as --with-ld
set to the new binutils, installed it, then built a second C++ compiler us
--- Comment #29 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 22:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=12555)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12555&action=view)
auto-host.h file from FC6 gcc build directory
Here you go Eric.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #30 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 22:05 ---
Since this is also new hardware for me, I'll try a couple of other things to
try and isolate. Note that gcc-4_2-branch is working perfectly for me, so I
have switched over to that for work as a temporary measure so I
--- Comment #31 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 22:14
---
> Here you go Eric.
Thanks. Why are COMDAT groups disabled in your compiler?
/* Define 0/1 if your assembler and linker support COMDAT groups. */
#ifndef USED_FOR_TARGET
-#define HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP 0
+#define
--- Comment #32 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 23:50 ---
Dunno. However, this bit is the same for gcc and gcc-4_2-branch on my system.
There are, however, other differences between the gcc and gcc-4_2-branch files:
%diff gcc/auto-host.h ../gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/auto-host.h
*
--- Comment #33 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 00:04
---
> Dunno. However, this bit is the same for gcc and gcc-4_2-branch on my system.
Weird. COMDAT groups are not supposed to be disabled on Linux I think.
Dave, are they also disabled on yours? If so, what compil
--- Comment #34 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-07
02:08 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] ext/bitmap_allocator/check_allocate_max_size.cc
execution test
> Weird. COMDAT groups are not supposed to be disabled on Linux I think.
>
> Dave, are they also disabled on
--- Comment #35 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 10:03 ---
PCH makes no difference. Same bugs with and without.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29639
--- Comment #36 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 13:10 ---
HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP is 0 because the ld version parser is too strict for Fedora
Core 6 ld --version, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg00398.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29639
--- Comment #37 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 15:27 ---
A ha! With Jakub's patch in everything is now ok with me.
thanks.
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29639
--- Comment #38 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 17:17
---
> A ha! With Jakub's patch in everything is now ok with me.
Do you mean that the C++ EH failures are gone? If so, it looks like my patch
badly interacts with some C++ idioms. Investigating...
--
http://gc
--- Comment #39 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 17:42
---
> Do you mean that the C++ EH failures are gone? If so, it looks like my patch
> badly interacts with some C++ idioms. Investigating...
Ok, that's it, if I disable COMDAT groups, I get the failures on x86/Linu
--- Comment #40 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-07
18:26 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] ext/bitmap_allocator/check_allocate_max_size.cc
execution test
> > Do you mean that the C++ EH failures are gone? If so, it looks like my
> > patch
> > badly interacts with
--- Comment #41 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-08 11:34 ---
Hey Eric. Yes, it looks like I'm all ok (test results are perfect) as long as
HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP is defined, but screwed if it isn't. Although I'm ok now, it
does seem as if something may be wrong in one of the code pa
--- Comment #42 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-08 11:41
---
> Hey Eric. Yes, it looks like I'm all ok (test results are perfect) as long
> as HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP is defined, but screwed if it isn't. Although I'm ok
> now, it does seem as if something may be wrong in one of
--- Comment #43 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-08
22:16 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] ext/bitmap_allocator/check_allocate_max_size.cc
execution test
> Yes, I'm investigating. Ultimately I could always resort to conditionalizing
> my change on HAVE_COMDAT_GROU
--- Comment #44 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-09 12:33
---
> Things are still broken on hppa-linux.
I have a fix (in the linker) for the !HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP breakage on x86 but
it is probably not sufficient on hppa. Could you try it anyway? Just relink
the libstdc++.so
--- Comment #45 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-09 12:34
---
Created an attachment (id=12575)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12575&action=view)
Linker fix for !HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP breakage
Successfully tested on x86.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--- Comment #46 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-11-10
09:08 ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> Created an attachment (id=12575)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12575&action=view) [edit]
> Linker fix for !HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP breakage
>
> Successfully tes
--- Comment #47 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-10
15:23 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] ext/bitmap_allocator/check_allocate_max_size.cc
execution test
> > Things are still broken on hppa-linux.
>
> I have a fix (in the linker) for the !HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP breakag
--- Comment #48 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-12 22:06
---
> Still broken. I should turn off HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP and see if that helps.
Does hppa-linux use non-standard text sections? Revised patch to be attached.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2963
--- Comment #49 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-12 22:08
---
Created an attachment (id=12600)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12600&action=view)
Revised linker fix.
Lightly tested on x86.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29639
--- Comment #50 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-13
02:01 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] ext/bitmap_allocator/check_allocate_max_size.cc
execution test
> > Still broken. I should turn off HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP and see if that helps.
>
> Does hppa-linux use non-stan
--- Comment #51 from chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-30 19:44
---
Subject: Bug 29639
Author: chaoyingfu
Date: Thu Nov 30 19:43:57 2006
New Revision: 119376
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119376
Log:
Merged revisions 118384-118452 via svnmerge from
svn
--- Comment #51 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 19:34
---
Created an attachment (id=12775)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12775&action=view)
File.
The errors go away if I disable HAVE_LD_EH_GC_SECTIONS.
I think this feature exposes a binutils in han
--- Comment #52 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 19:48
---
> The errors go away if I disable HAVE_LD_EH_GC_SECTIONS.
Sure, see comment #3.
> I think this feature exposes a binutils in handling pc-relative
> relocations when this feature is enabled. In particulary, it
--- Comment #53 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 22:10
---
Subject: Bug 29639
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Dec 21 22:10:30 2006
New Revision: 120121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120121
Log:
PR other/29639
* configure.ac (HAVE_LD_
--- Comment #54 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 22:13
---
Hopefully everywhere.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
40 matches
Mail list logo
