--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 10:14 ---
Subject: Bug 35042
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 1 10:14:08 2008
New Revision: 131998
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131998
Log:
2008-02-01 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 10:14 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-31 15:54 ---
-finline-limit=N should be deprecated. It is an alias for --param
max-inline-insns-single=N/2 --param max-inline-insns-auto=N/2.
There is no real default, instead the defaults for max-inline-insns-single is
450,
--- Comment #5 from ddenisen at altera dot com 2008-01-31 16:13 ---
@emph{Note:} there may be no value to @option{-finline-limit} that results
in default behavior.
That's also not user-friendly. When it is changed, it is not clear what is
more aggressive inlining and what is not.
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-01-31 16:22 ---
Subject: Re: Documentation for -finline-limit is incorrect
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, ddenisen at altera dot com wrote:
--- Comment #4 from ddenisen at altera dot com 2008-01-31 16:12 ---
@emph{Note:} there may
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-31 16:05 ---
I agree, just the switch will have different effects with different releases.
I will correct the documentation to something like
@item [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@opindex finline-limit
By default, GCC limits the size of
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from ddenisen at altera dot com 2008-01-31 15:59 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
-finline-limit=N should be deprecated. It is an alias for --param
max-inline-insns-single=N/2 --param max-inline-insns-auto=N/2.
There is no real default, instead the defaults for
--- Comment #4 from ddenisen at altera dot com 2008-01-31 16:12 ---
@emph{Note:} there may be no value to @option{-finline-limit} that results
in default behavior.
That's also not user-friendly. When it is changed, it is not clear what is
more aggressive inlining and what is not.
--- Comment #7 from ddenisen at altera dot com 2008-01-31 16:40 ---
If the default behaviour has to stay, then I think the option should be
removed. Having no option is better than having an option with an
unreproducible default.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35042
10 matches
Mail list logo
