https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115495
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] ICE in |[15 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115495
--- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Neill ---
This failure also appears when compiling glibc 2.39 with rv64gcv_zvl512b and
rv64gcv_zvl1024b.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115495
--- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp ---
At first it looked very weird that we need 50 (or so) instructions to expand
;; MEM [(short int *)] = vect_cst__21;
but then I realized that all the hoops we jump through are due to possible
misalignment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115495
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note in most cases `(subreg:DI (reg:V16HI 139 [ vect_cst__21 ]) 0) (const_int
16 [0x10])` would normally be a `vec_select` so I am shock that it is using a
subreg here ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115495
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115495
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
CC|