http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acn1 at cam dot ac.uk
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
meadori at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-18 14:16:46
UTC ---
The test fails on Linux/x86 and Linux/x86-64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-18 09:04:47 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri May 18 09:04:38 2012
New Revision: 187648
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187648
Log:
gcc/
2012-05-15 Meador Inge
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-05-17
21:07:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Mikael, is it possible for you to test if this is caused by this patch,
> please?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=142443
The error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
--- Comment #7 from Meador Inge 2012-05-17
20:31:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> There is no call to 'foo' in the test case here. I guess you meant 'bar', but
> even so executable test cases are strongly preferred over manual inspection of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-05-17
19:09:14 UTC ---
Mikael, is it possible for you to test if this is caused by this patch, please?
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=142443
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-05-17
18:35:00 UTC ---
There is no call to 'foo' in the test case here. I guess you meant 'bar', but
even so executable test cases are strongly preferred over manual inspection of
assembly code.
FWIW,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
--- Comment #3 from Meador Inge 2012-05-17
16:42:04 UTC ---
It can easily be seen my inspection of the assembly code. As I mentioned
before, 0xFF00 gets passed to 'foo'. Anyway, I posted an executable case along
with my patch here: http://gcc.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
--- Comment #1 from Meador Inge 2012-05-14
22:52:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 27405
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27405
Reproduction case
13 matches
Mail list logo
