[Bug sanitizer/107963] Support __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation))

2022-12-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

[Bug sanitizer/107963] Support __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation))

2022-12-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #3) > GCC doesn't implement -fsanitize=memory. > In the absence of it, __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation)) is > like

[Bug sanitizer/107963] Support __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation))

2022-12-04 Thread i at maskray dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963 --- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song --- GCC doesn't implement -fsanitize=memory. In the absence of it, __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation)) is like __attribute__((no_sanitize("all"))). When -fsanitize=memory is implemented, the two

[Bug sanitizer/107963] Support __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation))

2022-12-04 Thread sam at gentoo dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug sanitizer/107963] Support __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation))

2022-12-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-November/237787.html If I read this correctly, there is no reason for a new attribute for gcc.