https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #3)
> GCC doesn't implement -fsanitize=memory.
> In the absence of it, __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation)) is
> like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963
--- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song ---
GCC doesn't implement -fsanitize=memory.
In the absence of it, __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation)) is
like __attribute__((no_sanitize("all"))).
When -fsanitize=memory is implemented, the two
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-November/237787.html
If I read this correctly, there is no reason for a new attribute for gcc.