https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:63cc547f6d85819192afa795e9ade14f0800eda9
commit r10-6951-g63cc547f6d85819192afa795e9ade14f0800eda9
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
one additional point.
For earlier OS versions the 'atos' version installed is not sufficient to get
sensible output from the sanitizer (characterised by very long timeouts on
failed tests).
In that case, it i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #7)
> > --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE > Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> >> --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> [...
> >> Of course,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
[...
>> Of course, trying to workaround kernel bugs this way is w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
> These systems are EOL so we can't expect any fixes to the systems themselves.
>
> The question is "is the latest imported as an version even suppo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> These systems are EOL so we can't expect any fixes to the systems themselves.
>
> The question is "is the latest imported as an version even supposed to
> support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
These systems are EOL so we can't expect any fixes to the systems themselves.
The question is "is the latest imported as an version even supposed to support
10.7"?
I have a patch to unsupport the sanitiser fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> So you could just disable asan and keep ubsan (set ASAN_SUPPORTED=no in
> libsanitizer/configure.tgt for a particular darwin OS version, and if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So you could just disable asan and keep ubsan (set ASAN_SUPPORTED=no in
libsanitizer/configure.tgt for a particular darwin OS version, and if it is
32-bit only, also test x$ac_cv_sizeof_void_p = x4 ?
Of cours
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
12 matches
Mail list logo
