https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99814
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Alex Richardson from comment #5)
> Does the sanitizer runtime library include the
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D96348 patch?
>
> IMO the real issue is that dlsym() with RTLD_NEXT selects the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99814
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Alex Richardson from comment #5)
> Does the sanitizer runtime library include the
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D96348 patch?
Yes, the change was merged into GCC master some time ago.
>
> IMO the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99814
Alex Richardson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Alexander.Richardson at cl dot
cam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99814
--- Comment #4 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Thanks for the pointers! I reported it upstream in issue
[1390](https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/1390)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99814
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Strange, please report it to upstream:
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues
and CC people from https://reviews.llvm.org/D96348
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99814
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Breakpoint 4, __interception::InterceptFunction (name=0x3fffd61e8f2 "regexec",
ver=0x3fffd61eb7e "GLIBC_2.3.4", ptr_to_real=0x3fffd677d08
<__interception::real_regexec>, func=16779728,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99814
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
