https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116170
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116170
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116170
--- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin ---
Reduced test case:
$ cat test.i
int a, d;
_Float128 b, c;
void e() {
int f = 0;
if (a)
if (b || c)
f = 1;
if (d)
e(f ? 0 : b);
}
Options: -w -fstack-protector-strong -ffloat-store -O2 -mcpu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116170
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116170
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Is that strong enough? A const_vector (or a const_anything) as lhs of a set
does not make sense at all. How did we even try this, is some more generic
thing broken?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116170
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49d5e21d41aed827038f6766140e2449a64a9726
commit r15-2899-g49d5e21d41aed827038f6766140e2449a64a9726
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue Aug 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116170
--- Comment #6 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> Is that strong enough? A const_vector (or a const_anything) as lhs of a set
> does not make sense at all. How did we even try this, is some more generic
> thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116170
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
