[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-26 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joel at gcc dot

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-26 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.6.0 --- Comment

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-26 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-25 Thread dj at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23074|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-21 Thread dj at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dj at redhat dot com

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-21 Thread dj at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23014|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-21 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 00:31:30 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/11 15:22, dj at redhat dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 DJ Delorie dj

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-21 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 00:33:26 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/11 15:32, dj at redhat dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 DJ Delorie

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-21 Thread dj at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #11 from DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 00:37:35 UTC --- I set a breakpoint on the delete of that insn; at that time, the following insn did not have the /S set on it. At the time when the /S is added, the previous insn

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-21 Thread dj at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #12 from DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 00:40:44 UTC --- Of course, one could argue that perhaps the compare should *not* have been removed? I don't know how clever the new redundant compare removal code is.

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-21 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 00:42:52 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/11 17:38, dj at redhat dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-21 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 00:50:25 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/11 17:41, dj at redhat dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-21 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 04:03:24 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/11 17:41, dj at redhat dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-18 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-18 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2011-01-17 Thread dj at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #5 from DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com 2011-01-18 01:46:00 UTC --- Created attachment 23014 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23014 alternate patch Alternate patch. The v850.md patch tests frame_related, which is

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2010-12-10 Thread mon...@monami-software.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #4 from Masaki MURANAKA mon...@monami-software.com 2010-12-10 15:02:06 UTC --- I succeeded to build. I'm not sure if the patch follows is reasonable... yah, indeed quite ugly. Does anyone fix this? please, diff --git

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2010-12-09 Thread mon...@monami-software.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #1 from Masaki MURANAKA mon...@monami-software.com 2010-12-10 00:52:55 UTC --- Created attachment 22699 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22699 Pre-processed source.

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2010-12-09 Thread mon...@monami-software.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #2 from Masaki MURANAKA mon...@monami-software.com 2010-12-10 01:47:35 UTC --- Created attachment 22701 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22701 simplified source Additional info : the result of xgcc is gcc version

[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854

2010-12-09 Thread mon...@monami-software.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878 --- Comment #3 from Masaki MURANAKA mon...@monami-software.com 2010-12-10 02:35:53 UTC --- This issue will depends -m and -O option. cc1 -mv850 -O2 testcase-min6.i cc1 -mv850e1 -O2 testcase-min6.i cc1 -mv850e testcase-min6.i cc1