http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.0
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23074|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dj at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23014|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 00:31:30
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/11 15:22, dj at redhat dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
DJ Delorie dj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 00:33:26
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/11 15:32, dj at redhat dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
DJ Delorie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #11 from DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 00:37:35 UTC
---
I set a breakpoint on the delete of that insn; at that time, the following insn
did not have the /S set on it. At the time when the /S is added, the previous
insn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #12 from DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 00:40:44 UTC
---
Of course, one could argue that perhaps the compare should *not* have been
removed? I don't know how clever the new redundant compare removal code is.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 00:42:52
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/11 17:38, dj at redhat dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 00:50:25
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/11 17:41, dj at redhat dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-22 04:03:24
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/11 17:41, dj at redhat dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #5 from DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com 2011-01-18 01:46:00 UTC
---
Created attachment 23014
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23014
alternate patch
Alternate patch. The v850.md patch tests frame_related, which is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #4 from Masaki MURANAKA mon...@monami-software.com 2010-12-10
15:02:06 UTC ---
I succeeded to build.
I'm not sure if the patch follows is reasonable... yah, indeed quite ugly.
Does anyone fix this? please,
diff --git
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #1 from Masaki MURANAKA mon...@monami-software.com 2010-12-10
00:52:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 22699
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22699
Pre-processed source.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #2 from Masaki MURANAKA mon...@monami-software.com 2010-12-10
01:47:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 22701
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22701
simplified source
Additional info : the result of xgcc is
gcc version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #3 from Masaki MURANAKA mon...@monami-software.com 2010-12-10
02:35:53 UTC ---
This issue will depends -m and -O option.
cc1 -mv850 -O2 testcase-min6.i
cc1 -mv850e1 -O2 testcase-min6.i
cc1 -mv850e testcase-min6.i
cc1
20 matches
Mail list logo