http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647
--- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-12 19:45:56
UTC ---
Alternative patch with the same functionality:
--cut here--
Index: tree-ssa-phiopt.c
===
--- tree-ssa-phiopt.c (revisio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647
--- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-12 19:45:56
UTC ---
Alternative patch with the same functionality:
--cut here--
Index: tree-ssa-phiopt.c
===
--- tree-ssa-phiopt.c (revisio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-12 19:40:21
UTC ---
Perhaps simply:
--cut here--
Index: tree-ssa-phiopt.c
===
--- tree-ssa-phiopt.c (revision 188475)
+++ tree-ssa-phiopt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-12 19:26:12
UTC ---
We should update i386.c to have reasonable values for
size of l1 cache, size of l2 cache, size of prefetch block
and number of parallel prefetches, instead of 0s.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647
--- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-06-12
19:09:48 UTC ---
If this is incorrect, and zero is supposed to indicate a cacheless memory (do
they exist anymore?), then I can disable the adjacent-loads hoisting
optimization for that case. Som
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #4 from William J
