[Bug target/53647] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/20011229-1.c and gcc.c-torture/compile/pr25311.c

[wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53647

--- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-12 
19:09:48 UTC ---
If this is incorrect, and zero is supposed to indicate a cacheless memory (do
they exist anymore?), then I can disable the adjacent-loads hoisting
optimization for that case.  Someone know the answer for this?