https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #21 from Laurent GUERBY ---
I'm not familiar with mips ABIs but on gcc mips machine there's 32 bit code.
root@erpro8-fsf1:~# file /bin/ls
/bin/ls: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, MIPS, MIPS-II version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
linked (uses sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Laurent GUERBY from comment #18)
> Marxin, you have a cfarm account and access to gcc22 / 23 / 24 which are
> mips64 machines. If you need to change ssh keys see here:
> https://cfarm.tetaneutral
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #18 from Laurent GUERBY ---
Marxin, you have a cfarm account and access to gcc22 / 23 / 24 which are mips64
machines. If you need to change ssh keys see here:
https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/login/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Felix Fietkau from comment #16)
> Any update on this, or any way I could help in getting this fixed?
> It would be nice if we could finally switch OpenWrt to a more recent GCC
> version soon.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #16 from Felix Fietkau ---
Any update on this, or any way I could help in getting this fixed?
It would be nice if we could finally switch OpenWrt to a more recent GCC
version soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #15 from Leslie Zhai ---
(In reply to Felix Fietkau from comment #10)
> (In reply to Leslie Zhai from comment #9)
> > GCC 8.0 Still reproducible:
> >
> >
> > :
> >0: 8c830008lw v1,8(a0)
> >4:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Laurent GUERBY changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #14 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool ---
There are *two* conditional branches leading to that "return 1". After
dbr one is a delay-slot seq, and the other has lost the assignment of the
return value.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
It's the dbr ("reorg") pass that is deleting the insn.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #11 from Paul Hua ---
>
> Actually, I think that assembly looks unaffected by the issue.
>
Right.
> I have some doubts about the commits mentioned in this thread as well.
> r240965 looks like it simply changes the code generator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Felix Fietkau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nbd at nbd dot name
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Leslie Zhai changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lesliezhai at llvm dot org.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #8 from Paul Hua ---
On GCC 8.x, the r248351 fixed this.
commit fd891ec7f659e8785c3ed5757f6e60c95117b837
Author: segher
Date: Mon May 22 21:20:51 2017 +
cfgcleanup: Ignore clobbers in bb_is_just_return
The function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #5 from Hauke Mehrtens ---
The description already contains the full function incl. 4006fc.
Do you need more?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #2 from Hauke Mehrtens ---
Should I git bisect this or will someone else do this?
If I should do that, is there some documentation on how to setup a test case
and build and run this automatically?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #1 from Hauke Mehrtens ---
I only tested the GCC 7.X snapshot from 14. December 2017, not the GCC 8.X
version.
23 matches
Mail list logo
