https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f4a60c43d5cd805add6529b4528c35893c283ae
commit r12-10602-g5f4a60c43d5cd805add6529b4528c35893c283ae
Author: Georg-Johan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a49d212b54ab152737e3209b7f80af3a80966b8
commit r13-8893-g4a49d212b54ab152737e3209b7f80af3a80966b8
Author: Georg-Johann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f5620aed3976716e20e13c285dade56578d5bab
commit r14-10382-g9f5620aed3976716e20e13c285dade56578d5bab
Author: Georg-Johann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23a0935262d6817097406578b1c70563f424804b
commit r15-1860-g23a0935262d6817097406578b1c70563f424804b
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
I have no idea how to fix this one.
The problem is that the DImode move is being expanded into 8 x QImode loads
from memx, and there is no way to do stuff similar to PR115726 because we do
not have movdi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Unfortunately, the solution from above won't work for PR65657, an issue that is
basically the same: early use of explicit hard-regs and propagations from TER.
Hence -fno-tree-ter can be used as work-aroun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.creekmore@synapse-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Note: As TER performs the propagation, a work-around is to compile with
-fno-tree-ter.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
12 matches
Mail list logo