[Bug target/93494] [10 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_add_overflow since r10-3989

2020-01-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93494 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/93494] [10 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_add_overflow since r10-3989

2020-01-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93494 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efd26bbc81e94a324b3d3331a32eac089af8db1d commit r10-6349-gefd26bbc81e94a324b3d3331a32eac089af8db1d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Th

[Bug target/93494] [10 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_add_overflow since r10-3989

2020-01-29 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93494 --- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > With a slightly modified testcase: > unsigned short a; > > int > main () > { > register unsigned long long y = 0; > int x = __builtin_add_overflow (y, (unsign

[Bug target/93494] [10 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_add_overflow since r10-3989

2020-01-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93494 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/93494] [10 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_add_overflow since r10-3989

2020-01-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93494 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED