[Bug target/96866] ICE in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:13560

2024-08-25 Thread guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96866 Jiu Fu Guo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/96866] ICE in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:13560

2024-07-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96866 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jiu Fu Guo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:472eab9ab1fdfd0ba3a555ea9eb50e20307c7052 commit r15-2225-g472eab9ab1fdfd0ba3a555ea9eb50e20307c7052 Author: Jiufu Guo Date: Tue Jul 2

[Bug target/96866] ICE in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:13560

2024-04-25 Thread guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96866 --- Comment #3 from Jiu Fu Guo --- While, I'm wondering if we could accept this code, and handle it as something like: (insn 5 4 6 (set (reg/f:DI 118) (mem/u/c:DI (unspec:DI [ (symbol_ref/u:DI ("*.LC0") [flags 0x2])

[Bug target/96866] ICE in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:13560

2024-04-25 Thread guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96866 Jiu Fu Guo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/96866] ICE in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:13560

2024-03-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96866 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target|powerpc-*-linux-g