https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
Feng Xue changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7328faf89e9b4953baaff10e18262c70fbd3e578
commit r14-6961-g7328faf89e9b4953baaff10e18262c70fbd3e578
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
>
> --- Comment #2 from Feng Xue ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
--- Comment #2 from Feng Xue ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> See my proposal on the mailing list to lift the restriction of sticking to a
> single vector size, I think this is another example showing this. If you
> use BB lev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
