[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #8) > No fallout on x86 or aarch64. > > Of course using false instead of TYPE_SIGN (utype) is also possible and > maybe clearer? Well, wi::from_mpz doesn't take a

[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 --- Comment #8 from Robin Dapp --- No fallout on x86 or aarch64. Of course using false instead of TYPE_SIGN (utype) is also possible and maybe clearer?

[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 --- Comment #7 from Robin Dapp --- diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc index 4375ebdcb49..f8f7ba0ccc1 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc @@ -9454,7 +9454,7 @@ vect_peel_nonlinear_iv_init

[Bug tree-optimization/114396] [14 Regression] Vector: Runtime mismatch at -O2 with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|