http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
--- Comment #56 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-24
16:35:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #55)
By the way, I think I speak for the GCC project and its users when I say:
Merci beaucoup, Frédéric!
I hope we weren't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
--- Comment #57 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-24 21:34:23
UTC ---
Thank you very much for doing this.
I am hoping you would also be interested in upgrading the
sourceware.org bugzilla installation. It is hosted on the
same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
--- Comment #58 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-24
21:39:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #57)
I am hoping you would also be interested in upgrading the
sourceware.org bugzilla installation. It is hosted on the
same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
--- Comment #60 from Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com 2010-09-24
21:58:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #59)
This deserves mentioning on gcc.gnu.org. Thanks for the upgrade!
Yep, I had asked Frédéric for some input already. :-)
--
--- Comment #52 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-22 20:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=21864)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21864action=view)
upgrade to 3.6.2 patch, final (v2)
Based on recently filed bugs and on some changes which have been accepted
--- Comment #53 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-22 20:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=21865)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21865action=view)
GCC extension for 3.6.2, final (v2)
And its extension counterpart.
I fixed all bugs reported yesterday and today,
--- Comment #50 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-20 21:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=21851)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21851action=view)
upgrade to 3.6.2 patch, final
Here is my last iteration of the patch for the 3.6.2 upgrade. This patch alters
core
--- Comment #51 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-20 21:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=21852)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21852action=view)
GCC extension for 3.6.2, final
Here is the final version of GCC extension itself. You untar it from the
bugzilla/
--- Comment #49 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-16 22:51 ---
(In reply to comment #48)
The current bugzilla has
extra separating lines with the column names. The new installation does not.
Yeah, it is so by design. Not something I'm going to reimplement.
Note that we
--- Comment #47 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-15 21:16 ---
Per the email Ian sent a few minutes ago, we will upgrade Bugzilla this Friday,
September 17, for three hours starting at 18:00 GMT (11:00 PDT).
So *please* give a try at our test installation, and report any problem
--- Comment #46 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-12 20:24 ---
I read the patch attached to this bug, and I created a TODO list from it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=%3ABugzilla
Tell me if some of these features are no longer needed, to not make me
--- Comment #41 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 09:33
---
(In reply to comment #40)
A test installation based on a copy of the GCC Bugzilla database (snapshot
taken today, September 9) and upgraded to Bugzilla 3.6.2 is now live at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/.
--- Comment #42 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-09-10 09:58 ---
(In reply to comment #40)
Please give it a look, and file bugs related to missing or broken
customizations in the new Bugzilla product on the test installation, i.e.
using this link:
--- Comment #43 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 10:29 ---
The attachment is not viewable in your browser due to security restrictions
enabled by Bugzilla. In order to view the attachment, you first have to
download it.
I think at least text/* attachments should be shown.
--- Comment #44 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-10 10:34 ---
(In reply to comment #43)
I think at least text/* attachments should be shown.
Ah yes, sorry, I forgot to enable the allow_attachment_display parameter (which
is off by default). This is now fixed. Thanks for
--- Comment #45 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 10:46 ---
The Log In line in elinks looks quite weird. There is
a text field Bugzilla_login, then Bugzilla_password (both expected), but then
there is another text field prefilled with password:
input
--- Comment #40 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-09 22:43 ---
A test installation based on a copy of the GCC Bugzilla database (snapshot
taken today, September 9) and upgraded to Bugzilla 3.6.2 is now live at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/.
Please give it a look, and file
--- Comment #39 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-08 21:35 ---
I have done some progress. The DB has been successfully upgraded to 3.6.2
(locally, of course), and I have converted GCC hardcoded columns into custom
fields, i.e. using offically supported features in Bugzilla 3.x.
--- Comment #30 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 14:54 ---
Daniel, did you get the email I sent you on August 19? I need some help to
start working on this project.
Just in case someone else can help too, here is the content of the email I sent
to Daniel:
The welcome email
--- Comment #31 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 15:50 ---
(In reply to comment #30)
$ cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpso...@sourceware.org:/cvs/sourceware co sourceware
cvs server: cannot find module `sourceware' - ignored
cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules
Use the
--- Comment #32 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2010-09-07 16:15 ---
I believe the following should work:
cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpso...@gcc.gnu.org:/cvs/gcc co wwwdocs
bugzilla is a subdirectory there, not a module. sourceware.org and
gcc.gnu.org should both work, but since is GCC
--- Comment #33 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 16:22 ---
I guess you meant to be CC'ed?
--
LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #34 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2010-09-07 17:58
---
(In reply to comment #33)
I guess you meant to be CC'ed?
Yes. The work I started was a Perl script to convert a 2.20+ database to the
latest version. The last question I had of Daniel was could we get a
--- Comment #35 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 18:11 ---
(In reply to comment #34)
The last question I had of Daniel was could we get a test bed
so others could try out the new bugzilla setup--looks like that is underway.
Yes, we will have a test installation, as
--- Comment #36 from fche at redhat dot com 2010-09-07 18:16 ---
You're all set with plain shell access now.
Connect to irc.freenode.net #overseers for any further needs.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
--
fche at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |LpSolit at netscape dot net
|dot org |
--- Comment #37 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 22:50
---
Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
You should have shell access, do you not?
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:11 PM, LpSolit at netscape dot net
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
---
--- Comment #38 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 22:54 ---
(In reply to comment #37)
You should have shell access, do you not?
I have now, yes, thanks to fche, see comment 36.
I now have a working local copy of GCC Bugzilla to play with (both code and
DB). I have one
--- Comment #29 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-08-09 22:21 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
I think you should probably set yourself up an account on sourceware.
Fill out this form: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi and
list me as your referrer.
Done! I selected
--- Comment #28 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-19 12:00
---
Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:04 PM, LpSolit at netscape dot net
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
--- Comment #27 from LpSolit at netscape dot net
--- Comment #27 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-07-15 23:04 ---
For those who are interested, I'm on vacation till mid-August, meaning that I
have some free time to help upgrading GCC Bugzilla to 3.6.1.
As it's not acceptable to play with a production installation, we would need
--- Comment #26 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2010-05-27 23:26 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
Note: I have no urge or time to upgrade gcc's bugzilla anymore.
If ya'll want to work on it, i'm happy to give you all the
--- Comment #24 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-03-30 09:54 ---
We are very close from releasing Bugzilla 3.6:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554523
The plan is to release it next week. So you may as well upgrade to 3.6
directly. Note that I'm on vacation this week
--- Comment #25 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-30 23:18
---
Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
Note: I have no urge or time to upgrade gcc's bugzilla anymore.
If ya'll want to work on it, i'm happy to give you all the info i have
and get you shell
36 matches
Mail list logo
