http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
--- Comment #60 from Gerald Pfeifer 2010-09-24
21:58:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #59)
> This deserves mentioning on gcc.gnu.org. Thanks for the upgrade!
Yep, I had asked Frédéric for some input already. :-)
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
--- Comment #58 from Frédéric Buclin 2010-09-24
21:39:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #57)
> I am hoping you would also be interested in upgrading the
> sourceware.org bugzilla installation. It is hosted on the
> same machine...
Yup, see http:/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
--- Comment #57 from Tom Tromey 2010-09-24 21:34:23
UTC ---
Thank you very much for doing this.
I am hoping you would also be interested in upgrading the
sourceware.org bugzilla installation. It is hosted on the
same machine...
--
Configure b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
--- Comment #56 from Frédéric Buclin 2010-09-24
16:35:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #55)
> By the way, I think I speak for the GCC project and its users when I say:
>
> Merci beaucoup, Frédéric!
>
> I hope we weren't very annoying with the l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
--- Comment #53 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-22 20:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=21865)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21865&action=view)
GCC extension for 3.6.2, final (v2)
And its extension counterpart.
I fixed all bugs reported yesterday and today
--- Comment #52 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-22 20:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=21864)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21864&action=view)
upgrade to 3.6.2 patch, final (v2)
Based on recently filed bugs and on some changes which have been accepted
upst
--- Comment #51 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-20 21:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=21852)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21852&action=view)
GCC extension for 3.6.2, final
Here is the final version of GCC extension itself. You untar it from the
bugzilla/
--- Comment #50 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-20 21:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=21851)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21851&action=view)
upgrade to 3.6.2 patch, final
Here is my last iteration of the patch for the 3.6.2 upgrade. This patch alters
cor
--- Comment #49 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-16 22:51 ---
(In reply to comment #48)
> The current bugzilla has
> extra separating lines with the column names. The new installation does not.
Yeah, it is so by design. Not something I'm going to reimplement.
Note that we fina
--- Comment #47 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-15 21:16 ---
Per the email Ian sent a few minutes ago, we will upgrade Bugzilla this Friday,
September 17, for three hours starting at 18:00 GMT (11:00 PDT).
So *please* give a try at our test installation, and report any problem
--- Comment #46 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-12 20:24 ---
I read the patch attached to this bug, and I created a TODO list from it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=%3ABugzilla
Tell me if some of these features are no longer needed, to not make me w
--- Comment #45 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 10:46 ---
The Log In line in elinks looks quite weird. There is
a text field Bugzilla_login, then Bugzilla_password (both expected), but then
there is another text field prefilled with password:
Took me a while
--- Comment #44 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-10 10:34 ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> I think at least text/* attachments should be shown.
Ah yes, sorry, I forgot to enable the allow_attachment_display parameter (which
is off by default). This is now fixed. Thanks for catchi
--- Comment #43 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 10:29 ---
" The attachment is not viewable in your browser due to security restrictions
enabled by Bugzilla. In order to view the attachment, you first have to
download it."
I think at least text/* attachments should be shown
--- Comment #42 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-09-10 09:58 ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> Please give it a look, and file bugs related to missing or broken
> customizations in the new "Bugzilla" product on the test installation, i.e.
> using this link:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
--- Comment #41 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 09:33
---
(In reply to comment #40)
> A test installation based on a copy of the GCC Bugzilla database (snapshot
> taken today, September 9) and upgraded to Bugzilla 3.6.2 is now live at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/.
--- Comment #40 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-09 22:43 ---
A test installation based on a copy of the GCC Bugzilla database (snapshot
taken today, September 9) and upgraded to Bugzilla 3.6.2 is now live at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/.
Please give it a look, and file bug
--- Comment #39 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-08 21:35 ---
I have done some progress. The DB has been successfully upgraded to 3.6.2
(locally, of course), and I have converted GCC hardcoded columns into custom
fields, i.e. using offically supported features in Bugzilla 3.x. So
--- Comment #38 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 22:54 ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> You should have shell access, do you not?
I have now, yes, thanks to fche, see comment 36.
I now have a working local copy of GCC Bugzilla to play with (both code and
DB). I have one quest
--- Comment #37 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 22:50
---
Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
You should have shell access, do you not?
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:11 PM, LpSolit at netscape dot net
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #35 from LpSolit at
--
fche at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |LpSolit at netscape dot net
|dot org |
--- Comment #36 from fche at redhat dot com 2010-09-07 18:16 ---
You're all set with plain shell access now.
Connect to irc.freenode.net #overseers for any further needs.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
--- Comment #35 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 18:11 ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> The last question I had of Daniel was could we get a test bed
> so others could try out the new bugzilla setup--looks like that is underway.
Yes, we will have a test installation, as discu
--- Comment #34 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2010-09-07 17:58
---
(In reply to comment #33)
> I guess you meant to be CC'ed?
>
Yes. The work I started was a Perl script to convert a 2.20+ database to the
latest version. The last question I had of Daniel was could we get a t
--- Comment #33 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 16:22 ---
I guess you meant to be CC'ed?
--
LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #32 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2010-09-07 16:15 ---
I believe the following should work:
cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpso...@gcc.gnu.org:/cvs/gcc co wwwdocs
bugzilla is a subdirectory there, not a module. sourceware.org and
gcc.gnu.org should both work, but since is GCC Bugzilla
--- Comment #31 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 15:50 ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> $ cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpso...@sourceware.org:/cvs/sourceware co sourceware
> cvs server: cannot find module `sourceware' - ignored
> cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules
Use the mod
--- Comment #30 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 14:54 ---
Daniel, did you get the email I sent you on August 19? I need some help to
start working on this project.
Just in case someone else can help too, here is the content of the email I sent
to Daniel:
The welcome email I
--- Comment #29 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-08-09 22:21 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> I think you should probably set yourself up an account on sourceware.
> Fill out this form: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi and
> list me as your referrer.
Done! I selected "s
--- Comment #28 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-19 12:00
---
Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:04 PM, LpSolit at netscape dot net
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #27 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-07-15 23:04 ---
--- Comment #27 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-07-15 23:04 ---
For those who are interested, I'm on vacation till mid-August, meaning that I
have some free time to help upgrading GCC Bugzilla to 3.6.1.
As it's not acceptable to play with a production installation, we would need a
--- Comment #26 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2010-05-27 23:26 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
>
> Note: I have no urge or time to upgrade gcc's bugzilla anymore.
> If ya'll want to work on it, i'm happy to give you all the
--- Comment #25 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-30 23:18
---
Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
Note: I have no urge or time to upgrade gcc's bugzilla anymore.
If ya'll want to work on it, i'm happy to give you all the info i have
and get you shell a
--- Comment #24 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-03-30 09:54 ---
We are very close from releasing Bugzilla 3.6:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554523
The plan is to release it next week. So you may as well upgrade to 3.6
directly. Note that I'm on vacation this week
36 matches
Mail list logo
