[Bug target/69421] [6 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:6888 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69421 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Component|mid

[Bug c++/69392] G++ can't capture 'this' pointer to templated type using init-capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69392 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69421] [6 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:6888 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69421 --- Comment #2 from Martin Michlmayr --- Created attachment 37420 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37420&action=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug target/69421] [6 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:6888 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69421 --- Comment #3 from Martin Michlmayr --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > What target is this on? x86_64-linux-gnu

[Bug fortran/69417] ICE: tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type in gimplify_call_expr, at gimplify.c:2467

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69417 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/67489] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-builtin-8.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67489 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69418] [5/6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type ... in gfc_class_vptr_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:149

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69418 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/69347] [6 regression] excessive compile time with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69347 --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Jan 21 22:21:55 2016 New Revision: 232711 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232711&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH] [PR tree-optimization/69347] Fix memory consumption in threader &

[Bug fortran/69418] [5/6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type ... in gfc_class_vptr_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:149

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69418 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > likely r221474 (pr69418). read "likely r221474 (pr59198)".

[Bug tree-optimization/53991] _mm_popcnt_u64 fails with -O3 -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53991 --- Comment #9 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Still fails with r232693. This seems to be another case of difficult ordering between TM passes and other passes. It makes sense that we don't inline tm_pure because we must not loose that infor

[Bug fortran/68442] ICE on kind specification, depending on ordering of functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68442 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I am currently getting: > > $ gfc pr68442.f90 > pr68442.f90:10:21: > > character(kind=gkind()) :: x > > Error: Function âgkindâ in initialization expression at (1) must be an > intrinsic funct

[Bug fortran/69422] New: Unexpected result with allocatable character type component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69422 Bug ID: 69422 Summary: Unexpected result with allocatable character type component Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel with -fipa-sra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I understand everything you're saying Richi. Note however that the MIPS backend explicitly wants to align things based on the object's alignment -- even scalars passed in registers: /* Advance to an even

[Bug other/69006] [6 Regression] Extraneous newline emitted between error messages in GCC 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69006 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, patch URL|

[Bug target/46393] [4.9/5/6 Regression] m68k code size regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46393 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4

[Bug fortran/69418] [5/6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type ... in gfc_class_vptr_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:149

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69418 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4

[Bug fortran/69423] New: Invalid optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 Bug ID: 69423 Summary: Invalid optimization Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: un

[Bug c++/69290] [6 Regression] ICE on invalid initialization of a flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69290 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6 Regression] g++ ICE |[6 Regression] ICE on |

[Bug target/69252] [4.9/5 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c FAILs with -Os -fmodulo-sched -fmodulo-sched-allow-regmoves -fsched-pressure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69252 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Summar

[Bug target/69252] [4.9/5 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c FAILs with -Os -fmodulo-sched -fmodulo-sched-allow-regmoves -fsched-pressure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69252 --- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Jan 21 22:58:29 2016 New Revision: 232712 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232712&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/69252 * modulo-sched.c (optimize_sc): Allow bran

[Bug middle-end/67295] [ARM][6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/builtin-bswap-1.c scan-assembler-times revshne\\t 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #9 fr

[Bug other/69424] New: libcc1/findcomp.cc:21:18: fatal error: string: No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69424 Bug ID: 69424 Summary: libcc1/findcomp.cc:21:18: fatal error: string: No such file or directory Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocke

[Bug c/57855] passing unsafe function as transaction_safe function pointer does not generate error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57855 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONF

[Bug c/69425] New: __atomic_load should diagnose const output parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69425 Bug ID: 69425 Summary: __atomic_load should diagnose const output parameter Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug other/69424] libcc1/findcomp.cc:21:18: fatal error: string: No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69424 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug target/66655] [5/6 Regression] miscompilation due to ipa-ra on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655 --- Comment #17 from Roger Orr --- As you say, there seems to be another, unrelated, problem with the current trunk and cygwin. However, I have now successfully built gcc version 232300 under cygwin with this patch. Unfortunately, if I try to

[Bug tree-optimization/68976] [6 Regression] ICE w/ -O2 (and above) -fgraphite-identity (or -floop-nest-optimize)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68976 --- Comment #15 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2016-01/msg00644.html : Author: spop Date: Thu Jan 21 02:13:52 2016 New Revision: 232658 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232658&root=gcc&view=rev Log: fix PR68

[Bug middle-end/57348] [TM] ICE for transaction expression in gimplify_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57348 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/69405] [6 Regression] ICE in c_tree_printer on an invalid __atomic_fetch_add

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69405 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Jan 21 23:19:05 2016 New Revision: 232713 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232713&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/69405 - [6 Regression] ICE in c_tree_printer on an invalid __atom

[Bug libitm/69018] libitm/testsuite/libitm.c++/c++.exp: libstdc++ include paths don't work if tests set options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69018 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONF

[Bug tree-optimization/69292] [6 Regression][graphite] ICE with -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69292 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- ICE no longer occurs at r232659, the fix for pr68692. Can this PR be marked duplicate of pr68692?

[Bug c++/60908] compiler bug related to trans-mem.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60908 --- Comment #4 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Still happens with r232693.

[Bug tree-optimization/69110] [4.9/5/6 Regression] execution failure in gcc.c-torture/execute/doloop-{1,2}.c with -ftree-parallelize-loops=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69110 --- Comment #18 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #17) > (In reply to vries from comment #15) > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00801.html: > > ... > > > During testing however, I ran into two testsu

[Bug target/54670] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2125

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54670 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60908] compiler bug related to trans-mem.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60908 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spear at cse dot lehigh.edu

[Bug c++/63472] transaction_atomic within while loop causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63472 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/69405] [6 Regression] ICE in c_tree_printer on an invalid __atomic_fetch_add

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69405 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371 --- Comment #5 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> --- On 01/20/2016 11:46 PM, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371 > > --- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme --- > Doh, I should ha

[Bug c/69404] atomic builtins accept incompatible pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric at efcs dot ca --- Comment #6 from M

[Bug c/69425] __atomic_load should diagnose const output parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69425 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/63550] Multiple definition errors occur only with -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63550 --- Comment #1 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37421 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37421&action=edit Test case part 1/3

[Bug c++/63550] Multiple definition errors occur only with -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63550 --- Comment #2 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37422 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37422&action=edit Test case part 2/3

[Bug c++/63550] Multiple definition errors occur only with -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63550 --- Comment #3 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37423 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37423&action=edit Test case part 3/3

[Bug c++/63550] Multiple definition errors occur only with -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63550 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/52409] ((~a)|(~b)) is not simplified at the tree level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52409 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/31531] A microoptimization of isnegative of signed integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31531 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug middle-end/19986] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations (compared to RTL)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19986 Bug 19986 depends on bug 25530, which changed state. Bug 25530 Summary: (unsigned / 2)*2 is not changed into unsigned &~1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25530 What|Removed |Added --

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25530 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/69393] [6 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:27175 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69393 --- Comment #2 from Martin Michlmayr --- Ok, I can reproduce this issue like this: g++-6 -o STAR -flto -flto -g -O2 -fopenmp STAR.ii Genome.ii Stats.ii genomeGenerate.ii I've attached the preprocessed source.

[Bug lto/69393] [6 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:27175 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69393 --- Comment #3 from Martin Michlmayr --- Created attachment 37424 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37424&action=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug lto/69393] [6 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:27175 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69393 --- Comment #4 from Martin Michlmayr --- Created attachment 37425 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37425&action=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug lto/69393] [6 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:27175 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69393 --- Comment #5 from Martin Michlmayr --- Created attachment 37426 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37426&action=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug lto/69393] [6 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:27175 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69393 --- Comment #6 from Martin Michlmayr --- Created attachment 37427 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37427&action=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug lto/69393] [6 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:27175 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69393 --- Comment #7 from Martin Michlmayr --- I should note that I don't see this with -r -nostdlib, as described in the wiki. (sid)604:tbm@dl580gen9-02: ~/a] g++-6 -r -nostdlib STAR.ii Genome.ii Stats.ii genomeGenerate.ii -g -O2 -fopenmp -flto -flto

[Bug c++/69379] [6 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69379 --- Comment #10 from Martin Michlmayr --- (In reply to Martin Michlmayr from comment #9) > Ok, I'll re-start the delta run. I'm sorry, but this isn't making any progress so I cannot offer a reduced testcase. However, I'll attach preprocessed so

[Bug c++/69379] [6 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69379 --- Comment #11 from Martin Michlmayr --- Created attachment 37428 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37428&action=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug testsuite/67489] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-builtin-8.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67489 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/67489] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/p8vector-builtin-8.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67489 --- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Jan 22 03:01:27 2016 New Revision: 232717 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232717&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-21 Bill Schmidt PR testsuite/67489 * gcc.tar

[Bug tree-optimization/69426] New: [6 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: missing definition) w/ -O2 (and above) -ftree-parallelize-loops=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69426 Bug ID: 69426 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: missing definition) w/ -O2 (and above) -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 Product: gcc Version: 6.0

[Bug testsuite/69406] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2011/linkage.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69406 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme --- It does indeed. Thanks

[Bug c++/69427] New: gcc-4.9.3 compilation for the cross target m68k-rtems4.11 in i686-Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69427 Bug ID: 69427 Summary: gcc-4.9.3 compilation for the cross target m68k-rtems4.11 in i686-Cygwin Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocke

[Bug target/69427] gcc-4.9.3 compilation for the cross target m68k-rtems4.11 in i686-Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69427 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target|

[Bug target/69427] gcc-4.9.3 compilation for the cross target m68k-rtems4.11 in i686-Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69427 --- Comment #2 from Satish --- @Andrew Pinski I was using 4.9.3 $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.9.3

[Bug target/69427] gcc-4.9.3 compilation for the cross target m68k-rtems4.11 in i686-Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69427 --- Comment #3 from Satish --- @Andrew Pinski I was using 4.9.3 $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.9.3 (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Which version of G++ are you using at the beginning?

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #44 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #39) > We have backported r227748, 229160 and 229161 to our linaro-gcc-5 branch, > and we got a bug report from the kernel team. Sorry about the breakage.

[Bug target/69427] gcc-4.9.3 compilation for the cross target m68k-rtems4.11 in i686-Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69427 --- Comment #4 from Satish --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Which version of G++ are you using at the beginning? g++ also 4.9.3 $g++ --version g++ (GCC) 4.9.3

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69428] New: Many libstdc++ failures on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69428 Bug ID: 69428 Summary: Many libstdc++ failures on aarch64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstd

[Bug libstdc++/69428] [6 Regression] Many libstdc++ failures on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69428 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|Many libstdc++ fa

[Bug middle-end/67295] [ARM][6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/builtin-bswap-1.c scan-assembler-times revshne\\t 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295 --- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > At the RTL level, it would be nice if REE optimized away at least the > redundant zero extension, thus change: > cmp r1, #0 > rev16ne

[Bug rtl-optimization/65932] [5 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932 --- Comment #24 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- *** Bug 67295 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 Bug 64164 depends on bug 67295, which changed state. Bug 67295 Summary: [ARM][6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/builtin-bswap-1.c scan-assembler-times revshne\\t 1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/67295] [ARM][6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/builtin-bswap-1.c scan-assembler-times revshne\\t 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69428] [6 Regression] Many libstdc++ failures on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69428 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- It looks like a miscompiling. I am testing to see if revision 232711 caused it.

[Bug c++/69428] [6 Regression] Many libstdc++ failures on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69428 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |c++ --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski -

[Bug rtl-optimization/69307] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fselective-scheduling @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69307 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassig

[Bug rtl-optimization/54472] ICE (spill_failure): unable to find a register to spill in class 'AREG' with -O -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68442] ICE on kind specification, depending on ordering of functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68442 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 37430 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37430&action=edit Patch for testing (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) > > Are you getting this error with a cle

[Bug tree-optimization/68692] [6 Regression][graphite] ice: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692 --- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2016-01/msg00645.html : Author: spop Date: Thu Jan 21 02:14:01 2016 New Revision: 232659 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232659&root=gcc&view=rev Log: fix pr686

[Bug fortran/69397] ICE on missing subprogram in generic interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69397 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- See patch attached to PR68442, attachment 37430

[Bug fortran/68442] ICE on kind specification, depending on ordering of functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68442 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/69421] [6 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:6888 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69421 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69426] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: missing definition) w/ -O2 (and above) -ftree-parallelize-loops=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69426 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

<    1   2   3