[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libfortran/102370] Runtime failure with allocatable component of allocatable parent and MOVE_ALLOC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102370 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-17

[Bug fortran/102311] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_enforce_clean_symbol_state, at fortran/symbol.c:4278

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102311 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- For the sake of completeness: considered as "obvious" https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-September/056521.html

[Bug fortran/102287] optional allocatable array arguments (intent out) of derived types with allocatable components are not properly passed to subroutines.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102287 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/102333] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_generate_function_code, at fortran/trans-decl.c:6941

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102333 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug fortran/102311] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_enforce_clean_symbol_state, at fortran/symbol.c:4278

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102311 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102287] optional allocatable array arguments (intent out) of derived types with allocatable components are not properly passed to subroutines.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102287 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/102287] optional allocatable array arguments (intent out) of derived types with allocatable components are not properly passed to subroutines.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102287 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102311] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_enforce_clean_symbol_state, at fortran/symbol.c:4278

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102311 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-13 Ever

[Bug fortran/102240] [PDT] derived type parameter does not shadow variable name in enclosing scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102240 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-08 Ever

[Bug fortran/85130] Substrings out of range are not rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85130 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/67972] Substrings of arrays of unicode strings are of type DEFAULT rather than ISO_10646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67972 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.2.1, 12.0 Known to

[Bug fortran/100949] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1975

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100949 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/100949] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1975

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100949 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/101735] Type parameter inquiries for substrings are rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-02 Ever

[Bug fortran/101735] New: Type parameter inquiries for substrings are rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735 Bug ID: 101735 Summary: Type parameter inquiries for substrings are rejected Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/101536] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7324

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101536 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target

[Bug fortran/101514] ICE: out of memory allocating 18446744073709551600 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101514 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/101728] ICE in initialize_inlined_parameters, at tree-inline.c:3644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101728 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-09

[Bug fortran/77603] ICE: Segmentation fault (program f951)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77603 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/101814] New: Initialization of local variables broken in presence of SAVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101814 Bug ID: 101814 Summary: Initialization of local variables broken in presence of SAVE Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/101814] Initialization of local variables broken in presence of SAVE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101814 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-07 Ever

[Bug fortran/68568] ICE with automatic character object and save, in combination with some options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68568 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/101841] Wrong realloc-lhs warning with matmul and -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101841 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/101871] Array of strings of different length passed as an argument produces invalid result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101871 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11/12 Regression] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11] Pointless: Array|[10/11/12 Regression]

[Bug fortran/101101] ICE in gfc_build_array_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:1391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101101 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-29 Ever

[Bug libfortran/98076] Increase speed of integer I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98076 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.3|--- --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/101084] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1124

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101084 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/77693] ICE in rtl_for_decl_init, at dwarf2out.c:17378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I believe this is actually invalid code. One cannot initialize the pointer using the data statement as in the given example. A valid variant (which is accepted and works as expected) is:

[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11/12 Regression] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.0 --- Comment #14 from

[Bug fortran/68568] ICE with automatic character object and save, in combination with some options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68568 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/68568] ICE with automatic character object and save, in combination with some options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68568 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/101564] ICE in resolve_allocate_deallocate, at fortran/resolve.c:8169

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/99351] ICE in gfc_finish_var_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:695

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99351 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/78219] [F08] specifying the kind of a FORALL index in the header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102366] [10/11/12 Regression] large arrays no longer become static

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102366 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/78219] [F08] specifying the kind of a FORALL index in the header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||longb at cray dot com ---

[Bug fortran/102287] optional allocatable array arguments (intent out) of derived types with allocatable components are not properly passed to subroutines.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102287 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/85130] Substrings out of range are not rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85130 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/102371] Error for type spec in FORALL statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102371 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/102460] fortran internal compile error in coverage.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102460 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reduced testcase: MODULE MOD2 IMPLICIT NONE CONTAINS SUBROUTINE SUB1() ENTRY ENTRY1() END SUBROUTINE SUB1 END MODULE MOD2

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-September/056571.html

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/102460] fortran internal compile error in coverage.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102460 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/57360] Implement a warning for implied save

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com

[Bug fortran/102638] Add warning for implicit save

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102638 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 102638, which changed state. Bug 102638 Summary: Add warning for implicit save https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102638 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/102716] ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/65454] Extending both forms of relational operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/102685] [12 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Preliminary patch (untested): diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c index 0d0af39d23f..c5df42ba67a 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c @@ -1333,6

[Bug fortran/102685] [12 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/99348] ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.c:1286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/65141] ISO_10646 constant parameters convert kind when used with substring references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65141 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/65144] Problems printing, reading and accessing substrings of ISO_10646 character variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65144 Bug 65144 depends on bug 65141, which changed state. Bug 65141 Summary: ISO_10646 constant parameters convert kind when used with substring references https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65141 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/67972] Substrings of arrays of unicode strings are of type DEFAULT rather than ISO_10646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67972 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbeekman at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/88488] ICE in gfc_trans_array_constructor_subarray, at fortran/trans-array.c:1646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88488 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Slightly improved version of the patch of comment#6: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c index 6552eaf3b0c..a63a6631f59 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c +++

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- WIP patch that fixes comment#5 as like comment#0 and regtests cleanly: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c index 6552eaf3b0c..e1ab2e06fdb 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c +++

[Bug fortran/102787] [12 regression] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The wrong locus for comment#1 is fixed by: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c index cfaf9d26bbc..bfb371b82c9 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/check.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/check.c @@

[Bug fortran/102685] [12 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/102787] [12 regression] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Interesting. Cannot reproduce on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. However, changing the testcase as follows: program p integer, parameter :: a(1) = 2 ! integer, parameter :: b(2) = reshape([3,4], -[a])

[Bug fortran/65454] Extending both forms of relational operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-09-12 00:00:00 |2021-10-8

[Bug fortran/102787] ICE in new test case gfortran.dg/reshape_shape_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like an issue with simplification of array within array constructor: print *, - a print *, - [a] print *, - [[a]] end -fdump-fortran-original produces: code: WRITE UNIT=6

[Bug fortran/102717] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102717 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/102717] ICE in gfc_simplify_reshape, at fortran/simplify.c:6843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102717 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/102716] ICE in gfc_validate_kind(): Got bad kind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102716 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/102510] Function call has unnecessary stride check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102510 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- It helps to look at the (Fortran) context. As written, the subroutine version is declared with explicit size contiguous arrays. If the caller has a non-contiguous (strided) result array, it

[Bug fortran/102521] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6240

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-28 Ever

[Bug fortran/102520] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_constructor, at fortran/array.c:1802

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102520 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-28 Ever

[Bug fortran/102520] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_constructor, at fortran/array.c:1802

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102520 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target

[Bug fortran/102510] Function call has unnecessary stride check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102510 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/102521] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6240

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Corrected patch that addresses the remaining issue (for valid code): https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-September/056599.html

[Bug fortran/102520] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_constructor, at fortran/array.c:1802

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102520 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/98490] Unexpected out of bounds in array constructor with implied do loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/102043] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/82314] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:6972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82314 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/101327] ICE in find_array_element, at fortran/expr.c:1355

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101327 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > Well, it is a pure function. Fortran 2018, page 327, > > All standard intrinsic functions are pure. Of course you are correct. I wanted to express

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 51497 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51497=edit Patch Thanks for the research, Steve. The attached patch fixes the PR by excluding the listed functions.

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #51497|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99348] ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.c:1286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- This might actually be related to pr102521. The following variant compiles ok: program p type t character(3) :: c end type ! type(t), parameter :: x(1) = t('abc') type(t), parameter

[Bug libfortran/100954] writing to a character opens unit -10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100954 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102521] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6240

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Tentative patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.c b/gcc/fortran/decl.c index b3c65b7175b..cebc59e4ab5 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/decl.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.c @@ -2228,12 +2228,15 @@

[Bug fortran/102521] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6240

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/56688] static/saved variables prevent loop vectorization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56688 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|anlauf at gmx dot de |anlauf at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/102521] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6240

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102521 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The code works if we replace the r.h.s. in the initialization by an array: program p type t integer :: n end type ! type(t), parameter :: a(4) = t(1)! ICE

[Bug fortran/102599] Wrong simplification of inquiry parameters for complex arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code ---

[Bug fortran/102620] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at fortran/trans-array.c:865

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4

[Bug fortran/102582] allocate treats all variables as type CHARACTER after use of CHARACTER(LEN=NNN)::

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102582 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID

[Bug fortran/102595] ICE in var_element, at fortran/decl.c:298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102595 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102599] New: Wrong simplification of inquiry parameters for complex arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599 Bug ID: 102599 Summary: Wrong simplification of inquiry parameters for complex arrays Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/102458] ICE tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458 --- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #9) A tentative patch which fixes the remaining issue is posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-September/056584.html in the hope to learn

[Bug fortran/102113] parsing error in assigned goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102113 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/101349] ICE in gfc_get_descriptor_field, at fortran/trans-array.c:140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101349 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102685] [12 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514 since r12-4278-g74ccca380cde5e79

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 100970 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/100970] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100970 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >