https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85230
chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85230
--- Comment #7 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #6)
> Right!
>
> Unpoisoning before restoring SP looks like a reasonable and simple solution
> to me. I don't see any potential downs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85230
--- Comment #11 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Unfortunately that doesn't work, because the second argument to
> __asan_allocas_unpoison is incorrect then.
Unfortunately we can'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85230
--- Comment #14 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> or introduce a new virtual pseudo register that vregs pass would map directly
> to dynamic_offset.
Yeah, that's what I though about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85230
--- Comment #17 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> (In reply to chefmax from comment #14)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> > > or introduce a new virtual pseudo r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86090
--- Comment #3 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Jun 13 19:51:42 2018
New Revision: 261564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261564&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-13 Denis Khalikov
libsanitizer/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86198
--- Comment #4 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Jun 21 05:42:53 2018
New Revision: 261832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libbacktrace/
2018-06-21 Denis Khalikov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84250
--- Comment #5 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Jul 4 19:49:06 2018
New Revision: 262421
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262421&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2018-07-04 Maxim Ostapenko
PR s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80798
chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656
Bug 86656 depends on bug 80798, which changed state.
Bug 80798 Summary: Dynamic stack buffer (alloca) overflow in ObjC compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80798
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80798
chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85476
chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86755
chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78651
--- Comment #10 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Seems to be closed on GCC 8 and 7, OK to close?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78651
--- Comment #11 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to chefmax from comment #10)
> Seems to be closed on GCC 8 and 7, OK to close?
s/closed/fixed/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78651
chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78651
--- Comment #5 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 43652
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43652&action=edit
Untested fix
Simple untested fix that seems to cure the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78651
--- Comment #6 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Mon Mar 19 19:59:56 2018
New Revision: 258658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-19 Maxim Ostapenko
gcc/
PR s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87840
chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at
gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88022
--- Comment #2 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think nothing prevents us from trying several ranges, the question is whether
upstream guys will accept this...
I've just noticed that the code for dynamic shadow offset is already prese
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63292
chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88022
--- Comment #5 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> Agree with Jakub that if really not necessary, I wouldn't complicate
> libsanitizer.
My point was that we won't need to complic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81697
chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84250
--- Comment #8 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> Maxim, Jakub: Can the bug be marked as resolved? Or at least update Known to
> work?
Hm, I think the bug is still present -- the first f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78878
--- Comment #2 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Should be fixed, I guess, by:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67165
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70474
--- Comment #6 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Tue Apr 5 11:52:34 2016
New Revision: 234744
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234744&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Cherry-pick r224315,221379 and r241487 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70541
--- Comment #5 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Apr 8 10:46:13 2016
New Revision: 234827
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234827&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-08 Maxim Ostapenko
PR sanitiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624
--- Comment #10 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Apr 21 12:12:53 2016
New Revision: 235337
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235337&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Cherry-pick r266868 from upstream.
PR s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70624
--- Comment #11 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Apr 21 12:19:54 2016
New Revision: 235338
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235338&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Cherry-pick r266868 from upstream.
PR s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64354
--- Comment #2 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu May 19 12:05:59 2016
New Revision: 236457
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236457&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-19 Maxim Ostapenko
PR sanitiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71480
--- Comment #4 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Jun 10 12:57:14 2016
New Revision: 237306
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237306&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-10 Maxim Ostapenko
PR sanitiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81861
--- Comment #8 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Aug 17 11:58:13 2017
New Revision: 251145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251145&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-17 Maxim Ostapenko
PR targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67328
--- Comment #7 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Tue Jun 13 11:13:52 2017
New Revision: 249149
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249149&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-13 Yury Gribov
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80565
--- Comment #3 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Jun 29 08:50:21 2017
New Revision: 249771
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249771&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-29 Yury Gribov
PR bootstr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #8 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Nov 30 12:31:07 2016
New Revision: 243014
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243014&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/78532
* sanitize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78532
--- Comment #9 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Nov 30 12:32:55 2016
New Revision: 243016
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243016&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add PR sanitizer/78532 patch to libsanitizer/LOCAL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79042
--- Comment #2 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Jan 11 12:57:42 2017
New Revision: 244314
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244314&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/79042
* lto-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79042
--- Comment #3 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Jan 11 16:53:52 2017
New Revision: 244324
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244324&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/79042
* lto-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79042
--- Comment #4 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Jan 12 07:44:17 2017
New Revision: 244347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244347&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/79042
* lto-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887
--- Comment #8 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Jan 13 10:08:50 2017
New Revision: 244402
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244402&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/78887
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #15 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Jan 18 16:06:31 2017
New Revision: 244581
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244581&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/79061
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #17 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Mon Jan 23 09:12:29 2017
New Revision: 244773
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244773&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert fix for PR lto/79061 due to this regresses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #19 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Jan 25 07:45:40 2017
New Revision: 244890
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244890&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/79061
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #30 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Mon Jan 30 16:06:15 2017
New Revision: 245033
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245033&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/79061
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #32 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Feb 3 07:17:38 2017
New Revision: 245144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245144&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/79061
* asan.c (asan_ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #33 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Feb 3 09:13:06 2017
New Revision: 245148
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245148&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/79061
* asan.c (asan_ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78663
--- Comment #9 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Feb 3 12:17:59 2017
New Revision: 245149
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245149&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/78663
* sanitize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80414
--- Comment #1 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Apr 13 14:52:23 2017
New Revision: 246909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/80414
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81697
--- Comment #4 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Nov 30 21:38:16 2017
New Revision: 255283
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255283&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2017-11-30 Maxim Ostapenko
PR s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #15 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Tue Nov 8 22:06:02 2016
New Revision: 241978
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241978&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/63958
Reapply:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307
--- Comment #8 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Nov 16 11:13:19 2016
New Revision: 242478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242478&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/78307
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: v.garbuzov at samsung dot com, y.gribov at samsung dot com
The libbacktrace library doesn't work well with QEMU in application mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61530
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Jun 20 10:26:55 2014
New Revision: 211846
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211846&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-18 Yury Gribov
gcc/
PR sanitizer/61530
* asan.c (b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
--- Comment #2 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Mon Mar 16 11:17:32 2015
New Revision: 221457
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221457&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-16 Max Ostapenko
PR sanitizer/64820
gcc/
* cf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
--- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Fixed by r22145.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
Host: i686-linux-gnu
Target: aarch64-linux-gnu
Build: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Created attachment 35178
--> ht
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65624
--- Comment #1 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Created attachment 35179
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35179&action=edit
Trivial fix
Trivial fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65624
--- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> Actually, r218021 touches the argument expansion rather than builtin
> expansion functions, so I'm not sure that would fix it. But still, I can't
> reproduce this on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65624
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Apr 1 11:18:03 2015
New Revision: 221807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221807&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-04-01 Max Ostapenko
PR target/65624
gcc/
* confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65624
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org,
||ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org
Host||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Known to fail||6.0
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Ostapenko
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: tetra2005 at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target: arm-linux-gnueabi
I see lots of output pattern test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66046
--- Comment #5 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Oops. Let me prepare a patch. But I won't be able to test -- are you
> willing to test it once I have something?. If it passes both x86_64, I'll
> just commi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59897
--- Comment #5 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Jan 23 12:48:25 2014
New Revision: 206961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206961&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-23 Dominique Dhumieres
PR sanitiz
: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
It is impossible to override default value of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60055
--- Comment #1 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32034
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32034&action=edit
Proposed patch
Attached patch seems to fix the bug.
$ readelf -s ~/gcc-master-instal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60055
--- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #3)
> Hi,
>
> Does this work for you
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=200747
> ?
>
> These callbacks are intended for very specific usage
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60055
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67867
--- Comment #2 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Created attachment 36451
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36451&action=edit
Reprocase.
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #14 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Oct 21 07:44:35 2015
New Revision: 229113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229113&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libsanitizer/
PR sanitizer/63958
Reapply:
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
--- Comment #41 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Wed Oct 21 07:47:54 2015
New Revision: 229114
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229114&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libsanitizer/
PR bootstrap/63888
Reapply:
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041
--- Comment #1 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Yes, this is mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041
--- Comment #2 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Created attachment 36555
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36555&action=edit
First version of the fix.
Dominique, I'm sorry about that. Could you please try attached patch? There may
be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68016
--- Comment #2 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Ok, I guess won't fix here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041
--- Comment #5 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> With the patch in comment 2, bootstrap completed without any problem.
>
> Preliminary tests for g++ and asan
>
> === g++ Summary for unix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042
--- Comment #1 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
I wonder if the fix would be just output patterns adjustment (just like here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041
--- Comment #8 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Created attachment 36556
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36556&action=edit
The patch I've posted to gcc-patches ML for review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041
--- Comment #10 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> > Created attachment 36556 [details]
> > The patch I've posted to gcc-patches ML for review.
>
> I have not tested the part "removes -lc++abi flag for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041
--- Comment #11 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Oct 22 09:47:17 2015
New Revision: 229168
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229168&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229119.
libsanitizer/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041
--- Comment #12 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Should be fixed on trunk. Dominique, let me know if the issue still occurs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042
--- Comment #3 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Created attachment 36562
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36562&action=edit
Draft patch.
Here an expected patch for memcmp-1.c and sanity-check-pure-c-1.c output
patterns. Does it fix t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68016
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042
--- Comment #5 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Oct 23 07:22:37 2015
New Revision: 229212
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229212&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ASan output pattern tests on Darwin.
gcc/testsuite/
PR s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Should be fix on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68016
--- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Actualy, LLVM is not better here (perhaps even worse). Consider the following
testcase (it's the same Jakub provided in PR63888):
max@max:/tmp$ cat libfoo.c
long f = 4;
long foo (long *p) {
return *p;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68099
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68099
--- Comment #5 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Jonathan Ben-Avraham from comment #3)
> (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #2)
> > I actually believe this is a dup of PR66977, that was fixed by Marek quite
> > time ago. Could you try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68016
--- Comment #8 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Reid Kleckner from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> > Because symbol size is part of the ABI, and LLVM emits different symbol size
> > between -fsanitize=address and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68122
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se from comment #6)
> Is this fix in gcc 4.9.3?
No, this didn't go to GCC 4.9, only to GCC 5.
> If not, will go into 4.9.4?
Well, actually we didn't plan backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64690
--- Comment #1 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Thanks, I'll send the fix shortly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64690
--- Comment #2 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Jan 22 10:55:32 2015
New Revision: 219990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-22 Max Ostapenko
PR driver/64690
* gcc.c (insert_c
: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gn
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
