--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-12-13 01:18 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 130005 causes bootstrap failure with
--disable-checking
On 13 Dec 2007 01:12:13 -, daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #8 from daney at gcc
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-12-16 13:00 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression][frv] ICE in default_secondary_reload, at
targhooks.c:612
On 16 Dec 2007 12:55:21 -, rask at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch in comment #6 has one testsuite
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-01-12 12:26 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] DOM and VRP creating harder to
optimize code
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-12 10:49
---
I think symbolic substitutions should be only
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-01-18 11:56 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Missing optimization when storing
structures
--- Comment #8 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2008-01-17 18:34
---
This regression happens after the SSA
--- Comment #37 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-02-05 20:01 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Has any one managed to run the libjava test
suite on powerpc-apple-darwin9?
FAIL: LargeFile execution - source compiled test
FAIL: LargeFile -findirect-dispatch execution - source
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-02-14 22:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] bogus aliasing warning
On 14 Feb 2008 20:54:18 -, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is this documented in ISO C?
There is a Defect Report explicitly about
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-23 18:49 ---
Subject: Re: vector float | vector float is accepted
On 23 Aug 2007 18:45:47 -, tbptbp at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your patch and documentation conflict . Fix either, at your convenience.
Read
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-24 16:51 ---
Subject: Re: Local static variable in C++ constructor not visible for
debugging
On 24 Aug 2007 16:45:41 -, nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean?
The IA64 C++ ABI requires two
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-26 09:00 ---
Subject: Re: New: __imag operator drops side effects in subexpr
On 26 Aug 2007 05:21:22 -, sabre at nondot dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to not call bar.
The problem is in c-typeck.c (build_unary_op) (around
--- Comment #35 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-28 20:48 ---
Subject: Re: Unnecessary anonymous namespace warnings
On 28 Aug 2007 19:40:14 -, pluto at agmk dot net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #34 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-08-28 19:40 ---
(In reply
--- Comment #37 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-28 22:11 ---
Subject: Re: Unnecessary anonymous namespace warnings
On 28 Aug 2007 21:41:05 -, bangerth at dealii dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I thought too at first, but the request is valid anyway as long
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-29 00:56 ---
Subject: Re: GCC outputs invalid assembly when using -O2
On 29 Aug 2007 00:53:35 -, Hans dot Boehm at hp dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on Book 2, section 1.4 of the architecture manual, I believe aligned
--- Comment #39 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-29 08:52 ---
Subject: Re: Unnecessary anonymous namespace warnings
On 29 Aug 2007 03:15:04 -, bangerth at dealii dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a good question in itself whether pimpl_ has a type at all -- it's
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-29 22:23 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] Missing last digit is some formatted output
On 29 Aug 2007 22:18:58 -, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FM406 gives:
...
COMPUTED
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-30 18:35 ---
Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
/var/tmp/43/gcc-4.3.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-abi/abi.exp.
ERROR: could not compile testsuite_abi.cc
This was fixed by:
2007-08-30 Jakub Jelinek
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-30 18:44 ---
Subject: Re: [Regression 4.3] bus error compiling dqelg.f in scipy on intel
mac
On 30 Aug 2007 18:40:51 -, claumann at princeton dot edu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
build_classic_dist_vector_1 (ddr=0x434c3b20, ddr_a
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-02 13:26 ---
Subject: Re: New: Failed to warn uninitialized stack variable
On 2 Sep 2007 13:19:45 -, hjl at lucon dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uninit-2]$ cat x.c
typedef int mpz_t[1];
typedef struct
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-02 14:01 ---
Subject: Re: Failed to warn uninitialized stack variable
On 2 Sep 2007 13:56:13 -, hjl at lucon dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does bar get back to? Are you saying if a pointer is passed to bar,
it can get
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-02 14:02 ---
Subject: Re: Failed to warn uninitialized stack variable
On 2 Sep 2007 13:58:23 -, hjl at lucon dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can write such a function, I can pass you a pointer and your function
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-04 19:08 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in fold_const.c (fold_convert) when reordering USE statements
On 4 Sep 2007 19:03:39 -, ubizjak at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and c never generates RECORD_TYPEs
Yes it does. Structs
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-24 15:53 ---
Subject: Re: New: Spurious warning in TRANSFER intrinsic in Sept 24 snapshot
of gfortran
On 24 Sep 2007 15:48:19 -, michael dot a dot richmond at nasa dot
gov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I compile the program
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-24 21:26 ---
Subject: Re: Spurious warning in TRANSFER intrinsic in Sept 24 snapshot of
gfortran
On 24 Sep 2007 19:59:37 -, sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington
dot edu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The programmer for whatever
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-27 09:19 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] aggregate DSE disabled
On 27 Sep 2007 09:08:17 -, rguenther at suse dot de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did wonder what optimized that before... (maybe a separate bug for
this is more
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-09-30 16:58 ---
Subject: Re: gcc 4.2.1 ignores GNU ld on Solaris 9
On 30 Sep 2007 14:32:32 -, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-30 14:32
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-02 23:59 ---
Subject: Re: Unhelpful diagnostic for incorrect pointer-to-member function
syntax
On 2 Oct 2007 23:54:04 -, jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #6 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-05 17:05 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] TER breaks some inline-asm code (again)
On 5 Oct 2007 10:58:10 -, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-08 16:34 ---
Subject: Re: parallel v3: do not use __builtin_alloca, use VLA
On 8 Oct 2007 14:56:18 -, bangerth at dealii dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quicksort.h:68
multiway_mergesort.h:142
Benjamin, as a stopgap would
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-11 10:40 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 regression] Illegal instruction with build/genmddeps with
PPC405 build on powerpc
On 11 Oct 2007 10:28:03 -, tbm at cyrius dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it's just a coincidence that 4.1
--- Comment #47 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-25 20:45 ---
Subject: Re: wrong types in character array/scalar binop
On 25 Oct 2007 19:50:54 -, Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot
uni-muenchen dot de [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder why this name-mangling is necessary
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-27 18:10 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] slow compilation on ia64
On 27 Oct 2007 18:08:21 -, tbm at cyrius dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I showed that even with checking enabled the compiler was _much_ faster
2
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-27 23:22 ---
Subject: Re: Gcc can't be compiled with -mregparm=3
On 27 Oct 2007 23:16:57 -, rask at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please give this patch a try. I need it to build GCC with OpenWatcom, which
wants
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-28 11:57 ---
Subject: Re: Gcc can't be compiled with -mregparm=3
On 28 Oct 2007 11:14:37 -, rask at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many times do I have to say this is bad for most RISC targets (hosts
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-30 00:20 ---
Subject: Re: Gcc can't be compiled with -mregparm=3
On 30 Oct 2007 00:14:21 -, rask at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #17 from rask at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-30 00:14
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-11-16 20:26 ---
Subject: Re: Please enable stack checking (-fstack-check) by default
On 16 Nov 2007 18:35:15 -, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not true of probes in general, only of the generic
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-11-16 22:11 ---
Subject: Re: too agressive printf optimization
Is there any difference in the standard behaviour between printf(%s, NULL)
and puts(NULL)? I mean, why printf(%s, NULL) receives special consideration
but neither puts
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-11-25 11:54 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/release_unc_maxalign.adb execution
test
On 25 Nov 2007 08:51:45 -, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you need to ask Daniel what's going
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-04-21 19:41 ---
Subject: Re: Non-optimal (or wrong) implementation of SSE intrinsics
Gcc 4.4 and above supports different target options on the function
level but not on a basic block level. So you can create an interneral
version
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-04-25 14:25 ---
Subject: Re: gcc-4.4 -Wstrict-aliasing and
-Wstrict-aliasing=3 behaves like -Wstrict-aliasing=2 in gcc-4.3
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 7:22 AM, edwintorok at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
Hmm
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-04-27 07:16 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 Regression] libjavamath is linking against libgmp
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 26, 2009, at 11:54 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #3 from
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 23:13 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.5 Regression] ./plugin-version.h:11: error:
'gcc_version' defined but not used
Looks like this failson non elf hosts (well darwin supports dlopen so
I don't understand why it fails on darwin
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-06-07 07:23 ---
Subject: Re: New: Array + XOR swap fails
Both of these are undefined. Look up about sequence point rules.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2009, at 12:15 AM, ashutosh dot sharma dot 0204 at gmail
dot com gcc-bugzi
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-06-17 13:12 ---
Subject: Re: -mno-sched-prolog breaks function parameter debug location lists
This option should just be removed.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:21 AM, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
gcc-bugzi
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-06-25 19:33 ---
Subject: Re: nop insertion does not look see restrict pointers
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 25, 2009, at 12:30 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #6 from rguenth
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-04 01:38 ---
Subject: Re: New: Bus error caused by ldd/std instructions in struct copy.
This code is undefined because of alignment requirments differences
for the structs and the union.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 3, 2009, at 6
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-07 03:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: dereferencing type-punned pointer warnings cannot be
disabled
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 6, 2009, at 6:12 PM, mikulas at artax dot karlin dot mff dot
cuni dot cz gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-07 03:48 ---
Subject: Re: dereferencing type-punned pointer warnings cannot be disabled
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 6, 2009, at 6:34 PM, mikulas at artax dot karlin dot mff dot
cuni dot cz gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-07 03:50 ---
Subject: Re: dereferencing type-punned pointer warnings cannot be disabled
Thus code is undefined you have an acess of a char array as a struct.
Yes you are only taking the address of an element but it is still
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-07-08 08:13 ---
Subject: Re: New: Optimizer handles loops with volatiles and post-incr. wrong
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 8, 2009, at 12:32 AM, bastian dot schick at sciopta dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-04 13:57 ---
Subject: Re: -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:32 AM, rguenther at suse dot de
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-08 19:57 ---
Subject: Re: Code optimized for AMD Geode is slower than generic
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 8, 2009, at 11:52 AM, rootkit85 at yahoo dot it
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #4 from rootkit85
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-08 20:29 ---
Subject: Re: New: Incorrect stack setup on x86_64
The x86_64 abi includes a red zone. So I doubt this a bug in gcc
unless netbsd's abi does not match what gcc does.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 8, 2009, at 12:25 PM
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-14 22:44 ---
Subject: Re: lto-elf.c fails to compile on IRIX 6.5
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 14, 2009, at 2:35 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-16 14:31 ---
Subject: Re: New: DWARF .debug_macinfo contains unused macros
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 16, 2009, at 6:12 AM, jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
-g3 currently produces huge
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-27 19:12 ---
Subject: Re: New: A problem with -maltivec
Can you attach the preprocessed source for the configure test that is
failing? It looks like the context sensitive keywords is causing the
header to fail to compile.
Sent
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 13:14 ---
Subject: Re: New: wrong code with -O1
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 30, 2009, at 7:56 AM, debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
current trunk/branches on x86_64-linux-gnu. return
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-01-07 17:18 ---
Subject: Re: Optimizer breaks boost shared_ptr
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 7, 2010, at 8:56 AM, rlogel at navtech dot aero
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #5 from rlogel at navtech dot aero
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-09-24 17:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: GCC applies signed strict-overflow rules to unsigned short
type
When doing addition unsigned short is promoted to an signed int. So
this is not a bug. That is unsigned short + 1 is a signed int
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-09-29 02:56 ---
Subject: Re: New: can't use iostream library
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 28, 2008, at 7:44 PM, hadmanysons at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Whenever I try to compile something using the iostream library
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-09-30 18:11 ---
Subject: Re: New: C++ over-eager optimization when working with a pointer
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:26 AM, jrenggli at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The following code results
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-02 11:24 ---
Subject: Re: New: Different class sizes with public/private and alignments
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 2, 2008, at 2:09 AM, adam at os dot inf dot tu-dresden dot de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been experiencing
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-03 17:33 ---
Subject: Re: initialization from incompatible pointer type does not say
which field is being initialized
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 3, 2008, at 5:51 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-03 17:34 ---
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 3, 2008, at 1:38 AM, ivranos at freemail dot gr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #9 from ivranos at freemail dot gr 2008-10-03 08:38
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-03 18:23 ---
Subject: Re: New: if scoping for declarations
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 3, 2008, at 11:10 AM, mrs at apple dot com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-October/017449
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-07 10:45 ---
Subject: Re: Member variable of empty base optimized (EBO) class appears on
wrong offset
Iirc there are some pod vs non pod issues here dealing wit padding and
the c++ standard and not even the abi.
Sent from my
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-08 16:57 ---
Subject: Re: -Wfatal-errors aborts too early
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-11 17:05 ---
Subject: Re: New: Nested type leaks to global scope
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 11, 2008, at 5:28 AM, therealfroggey at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
GCC versions used:
gcc version 4.1.2
gcc version
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-12 20:47 ---
Subject: Re: if-combine doesn't optimize != after = test
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 1:40 PM, rguenther at suse dot de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. ifcombine only combines on the CFG, in PR28685 we are dealing
with a CFG
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-16 15:40 ---
Subject: Re: gcc ignores FP_CONTRACT pragma set to OFF
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 16, 2008, at 2:42 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-19 17:24 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in extract_bit_field_1
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 19, 2008, at 7:39 AM, bernard at brenda-arkle dot me dot uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from bernard at brenda-arkle dot me
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-29 07:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] IRA generates slower code for -mtune=core2
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 29, 2008, at 12:17 AM, bonzini at gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-02 13:07 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] offset warning should be given in the
front-end
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 2, 2008, at 4:53 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #10
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-04 17:46 ---
Subject: Re: New: Option to turn off usage of any precompiled header
You can also just do -Dineednopchreallyidont :).
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 4, 2008, at 8:23 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-12 18:01 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] System header files not found once -isystem
/usr/include is used
Hmm, shouldn't the preprocessor just mark the include as a duplicate?
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 12, 2008, at 8:50 AM
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 05:56 ---
Subject: Re: New: dbxout_expand_expr() doesn't check return value of
DECL_VALUE_EXPR()
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 12, 2008, at 8:11 PM, d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
tree.c
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-14 18:02 ---
Subject: Re: gcc source contains a struct with no data members (actually 1
byte in size) and compiler does not initialize it, resulting in IBM Rational
Purify reporting an Uninitialized Memory Read.
Sent from my
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-15 01:40 ---
Subject: Re: using stdio.h fails if gcc invoked in a directory which has a
subdirectory called gcc
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 14, 2008, at 5:01 PM, mvanier at cs dot caltech dot edu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-15 18:43 ---
Subject: Re: New: vim crashes on startup when compiled with -O3 but works
with -O2
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 15, 2008, at 10:05 AM, dominique dot pelle at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Vim (at least
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-15 21:51 ---
Subject: Re: New: --enable-checking=all times out during bootstrap
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:27 PM, edwintorok at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I tried to build a gcc 4.4.0
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-15 22:15 ---
Subject: Re: --enable-checking=all times out during bootstrap
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:59 PM, edwintorok at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #2 from edwintorok at gmail
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-20 07:05 ---
Subject: Re: New: Inconsistent function results depending on irrelevant write
statement
I don't think INF is the same as infinity. It is most like implict
declared variable with an undefined value.
Sent from my
--- Comment #21 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-22 17:17 ---
Subject: Re: can't disable __attribute__((warn_unused_result))
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 22, 2008, at 7:42 AM, thomas at mich dot com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #20 from thomas at mich dot com
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-30 19:29 ---
Subject: Re: Missing CSE/PRE for memory operations involved in virtual call.
I think this bug is invalid since the type can change via a placement
new which will change the vtable.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-12-10 11:20 ---
Subject: Re: Output code optimisation excessive use of builtins
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 10, 2008, at 2:51 AM, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-12-15 21:39 ---
Subject: Re: Gcc misaligns arrays when stack is forced follow the x8632 ABI
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 15, 2008, at 1:33 PM, whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #15
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-12-15 23:02 ---
Subject: Re: Gcc misaligns arrays when stack is forced follow the x8632 ABI
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:01 PM, whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
LSB was merely the umbrella bringing together
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-12-29 00:49 ---
Subject: Re: toplevel configure script does not test for GNU Make
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 6:01 PM, bkorb at gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
--- Comment #2 from bkorb at gnu dot org 2008-12-28 23:01
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-01 04:19 ---
Subject: Re: static object mangling conflicts with extern object
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 29, 2008, at 20:05, geoffk at geoffk dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #8 from geoffk at geoffk dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-03 01:43 ---
Subject: Re: ICE on Valid Code
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 2, 2008, at 16:54, mckelvey at maskull dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #3 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2008-03-03
00:54
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-03 20:14 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE with -ftrapv
This is caused by the vectorizer.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 3, 2008, at 11:50, reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The following
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-04 08:49 ---
Subject: Re: Different results for inlined vs. non-inlined function
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 4, 2008, at 0:40, ubizjak at gmail dot com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-06 16:40 ---
Subject: Re: GCC is not ported to AIX 5.3 / AIX 6.1
This was done for GCC 4.3.0.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 6, 2008, at 6:58, Laurent dot Vivier at bull dot net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-07 07:01 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 132991 breaks 483.xalancbmk
This is most likely the c++ front-end setting readonly when it should
not.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 6, 2008, at 22:06, hjl dot tools
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-11 04:53 ---
Subject: Re: Problem compiling gdb/symtab.c in GDB 6.7.1 using GCC 4.3.0 on
Solaris 10
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 10, 2008, at 21:23, jonathan dot leffler at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-12 05:51 ---
Subject: Re: New: value profiling support for memOps such as memcpy
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 11, 2008, at 22:32, xinliangli at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Value profiling on the length parameters
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-19 06:10 ---
Subject: Re: New: [avr] result of char promotion comes out of CHAR_MIN/MAX
This code is only defined if char is unsigned which it is not on avr.
(It is unsigned on some targets like powerpc-Linux-gnu.
Sent from my
--- Comment #31 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-20 00:23 ---
Subject: Re: compiled trivial vector intrinsic code is inefficient
See pr 33790.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2008, at 17:04, ubizjak at gmail dot com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #30 from
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-23 16:50 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression]: gcc-4.3 -O3/-ftree-vectorize regression:
incorrect code generation
This code violates c/c++ aliasing rules.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 23, 2008, at 6:33, victork at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-25 15:20 ---
Subject: Re: struct-layout-1.exp fails at -O2
No the compiler should be able to load the packed struct no matter
what. If that means doing byte by byte loads then so be it.
-- Pinski
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 25
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-29 05:08 ---
Subject: Re: New: apparent integer math bug
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 28, 2008, at 21:40, regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is for gcc (GCC) 4.3.0.
This function returns different
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-03-29 09:02 ---
Subject: Re: postreload can handle the case where the memory locations use
different modes
I forgot to mention that the dse patch fixes the problem earlier on so
we now do the optimization pre-reload. We still have
101 - 200 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
