https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Summary|Wrong code fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92550
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|FAIL: |FAIL:
|gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-sra-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
--- Comment #36 from Sam James ---
Two more fixes are pending review at
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20240506044542.102727-2-xry...@xry111.site/.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|New tests from |[15 regression] New tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102677
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116123
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> flex is required for building GCC from git even without m2.
>
> gengtype-lex.l needs to be processed by flex.
Yes, I was surprised to see FX ask for this because i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116130
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> BTW, the rule about composite types sounds fairly dangerous in the ?:
> operator case.
> For redeclarations it is the right thing, but for ?: yielding the union of
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116130
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #5)
I brought it up at
https://social.treehouse.systems/@thesamesam/110148110341108345 too where
[[unsequenced]] and [[reproducible]] were mentioned.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115824
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115824
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116146
Bug ID: 116146
Summary: Split insn-recog.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116138
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111600
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116151
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116153
Bug ID: 116153
Summary: -fdebug-compare failure when building bmake
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116153
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
With 13 (my copies of 14+15 have the bad IPA dump commit, not rebuilt yet), I
see the first diff in einline in value numbering:
@@ -1322,10 +1437,10 @@
Merging blocks 18 and 15
_Bool CondParser_StringExpr (st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154
Bug ID: 116154
Summary: gcc.dg/torture/pr67947.c fails on pru-unknown-elf
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Ah, CC'd Dimitar Dimitrov who seems to run that buildbot and has his name in
config/pru :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116155
Bug ID: 116155
Summary: c-c++-common/fam-in-union-alone-in-struct-1.c fails on
pru-unknown-elf
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101478
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115697
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100162
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116156
Bug ID: 116156
Summary: [14/15 regression] -fcompare-debug
-gno-statement-frontiers failure with -O2 when
building gdk-pixbuf
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|sjames at gcc dot gnu.org |dimitar at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Dimitar Dimitrov from comment #4)
Dimitar, if you'd be so kind, that'd be great. Thanks!
(Sorry, no idea where I got Dmitry from.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116161
Bug ID: 116161
Summary: -fcompare-debug -gno-statement-frontiers failure with
-O3 -march=native -fno-vect-cost-model when building
rapidfuzz
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116161
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-fcompare-debug |-fcompare-debug
|-gno-sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116161
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
It's so slow to compile that I don't know if I can reduce this. I might just
look for other testcases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
* Missing braces (e.g. 'dg-do run }' or 'dg-do run')
Problem: Checking for that is noisy because some people have been good and
explained workarounds but then they mention 'dg-...' in a comment and it might
loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110061
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116154
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Cheers Dimitar.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116173
Bug ID: 116173
Summary: [15 regression] /analyzer/call-summary.cc:727:28:
warning: unused variable ‘summary_cast_reg’
[-Wunused-variable]
Product: gcc
Version: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70200
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116179
Bug ID: 116179
Summary: [15 regression] -fcompare-debug
--gno-statement-frontiers failure with -O3 when
building mesa-24.1.4
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116179
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Reducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116179
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58795
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58795&action=edit
reduced.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116179
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58795|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116179
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
I think the first difference is in x.ii.003l.raw?
```
@@ -78,17464 +78,17479 @@
srcp: x.ii:9 chain: @59
size: @28 algn: 64 used: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116179
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
Ah, I see what I did wrong now with my sorting too. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116181
Bug ID: 116181
Summary: -Wlto-type-mismatch warnings/errors during m2
bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116182
Bug ID: 116182
Summary: bootstrap-lto should set a small list of -Werror
options for LTO correctness
(-Werror=lto-type-mismatch,odr,strict-aliasing)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116183
Bug ID: 116183
Summary: -fcompare-debug broken with piped input
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116183
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65264
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104178
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.4.1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106375
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 regreesion] Lowering|[13 regression] Lowering
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109334
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|14.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106816
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105063
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105238
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116166
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-02
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65264
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115917
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108087
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90151
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|554.roms_r regression on|[12/13/14/15 regression]
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116187
Bug ID: 116187
Summary: -Wuninitialized warnings in
libgrust/libproc_macro_internal/literal.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116188
Bug ID: 116188
Summary: Drop building libcody for stage1 for bootstraps
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116188
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113341
--- Comment #16 from Sam James ---
glaubitz, could you check with gcc-14.2 or trunk? I have a feeling honza's IPA
fixes recently sort this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113652
--- Comment #29 from Sam James ---
csfore, erhard, could you test
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/zpioop6il_igm...@cowardly-lion.the-meissners.org/?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35199
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
Bug 84402 depends on bug 109051, which changed state.
Bug 109051 Summary: Configure takes long time for multibuild of run-time
libraries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109051
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109051
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110607
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51450
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
Possibly fixed by:
commit 11869b9c9eb8bcc8cb6a615141f522a447377324
Author: Gary V. Vaughan
Date: Sat Nov 26 11:06:35 2011 +0700
m4: fix logic error leading to -fno-rtti being added wrongly.
* m4/lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116179
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] |[15 regression]
|-fcompar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #5)
> I've hit a similar ICE testing libbacktrace with LTO bootstrapped GCC on
> LoongArch:
I hit this today too.
Unfortunately, it seems that libbacktrace gets relinked (an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-02
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
(My reluctance is because getting a proper set of C sources to reproduce it
seems to keep hiding from me.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> the non-presence of n{1,2}->lto_file_data represented as -1 makes whether
> non-presence is first dependent on the value of the order of the other.
>
That might
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
* Missing dg- prefix (e.g. "// { message }") or "{ require-effective* ... }"
* s/dg/do/, e.g. "{ do-do compile }"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116163
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
* "dsg-message"
* "do-message"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116178
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
Build systems like autoconf currently hardcode a list of C++ and C standards
which has to be updated every so often (and often gets forgotten about).
autoconf at least will aggressively pick the latest one it kn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116178
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #8)
To give another example where it might be useful: ICU often ends up cranking
the C++ standard its headers expect before its consumers have bumped it,
recently this was w/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116178
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
> If you want to play with new features, there's a flag to enable them already.
> Does -std=c++whatever actually support some new use case that you can't do
> today? Or just "I can't be bothered to decide, gi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116198
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
extern "C" does _not_ change the language something is built as, just linkage.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116200
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116200
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116166
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=11160
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116156
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
Thank you as ever.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116182
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bootstrap-lto should set a |bootstrap-lto should set a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116148
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116207
Bug ID: 116207
Summary: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c is broken (started
being tested with r15-2414-g2d105efd6f60)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116207
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/simd/simd.exp ...
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times
\\tsmmla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116207
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
>From the logs:
```
PASS: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c (test for excess errors)
gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times
\\t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116207
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> I think we want dg-do compile here. It looks like scan-assembler-times
> doesn't work with dg-do assemble?
No, this is wrong, other testcases do it fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116207
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> -save-temps is used in others.
Ah, thanks. There's a bunch of other dubious tests too then.
Need to check (some may be OK if .exp sets stuff up fine, some are also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
Bug ID: 116208
Summary: "inlined from" diagnostic note has whitespace after
function name
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Oh!
$ rg __ct_base
gcc/cp/decl.cc:4782:{"__ct_base ", &base_ctor_identifier, cik_ctor},
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Pretty sure yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116210
Bug ID: 116210
Summary: 17_intro/names.cc test fails
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116210
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
stdlib.h:46 for me is:
```
__fortify_function __attribute_overloadable__ __wur char *
__NTH (realpath (const char *__restrict __name,
__fortify_clang_overload_arg (char *, __restrict,
__resolved
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116210
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
This probably only shows up with _FORTIFY_SOURCE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116210
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116212
Bug ID: 116212
Summary: [13/14/15 regression] -Walloc-size-larger-than warning
when building
20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_move/cons
trained.cc with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116213
Bug ID: 116213
Summary: -Wmaybe-uninitialized in tree-ssa-loop-niter.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116214
Bug ID: 116214
Summary: -Wmaybe-uninitialized in tree-vect-stmts.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116215
Bug ID: 116215
Summary: -Wstringop-overflow in i386-expand.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
1401 - 1500 of 1725 matches
Mail list logo
