Dear Tobias,
Many thanks for the review and your replies to redux(1)/(2).
I will take account of your comments and commit tomorrow night.
I have a fix for the allocation of class temporaries, which cures the
problem with index vectors It will see the light of day on Monday.
Happy New Year
Hi,
this issue, reported by Dave (and Jon), is about the error message
printed for a static_assert like:
static_assert('X' != '\130', 'X' has the wrong value);
where, due to the use of %E, we go through pp_c_string_literal and thus
pp_c_char, and we escape the single quotes around X.
Dear all,
first, I hope you will have (or already had) a good start into the new year!
This patch is rather obvious. Thanks to Dominique for reporting the issue.
Build and regtested on x86-64-linux.
OK for the trunk?
Happy New Year to all,
Tobias
caf-i8.diff
Description:
On 29 December 2011 18:00, François Dumont wrote:
Attached patch applied.
Thanks!
(_Local_iterator_base, _Locale_iterator,
_Locale_const_iterator):
I've fixed these two instances of Locale in the ChangeLog
I might also rename _Ebo_helper to something more specific such as
On 12/30/2011 04:34 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
So, I'm wondering why it was done this way originally:
- static int S1; // ERROR - uses same name 9.3
+ static int S1; // { dg-error } uses same name 9.3
and not:
- static int S1; // ERROR - uses same name
OK.
Jason
Hello, as promised, here is a fix for pr50981.
Currently, for a call to an elemental procedure, every scalar actual
argument is evaluated before the loop containing the function call.
The bug is, we can't evaluate the actual argument if it is a reference
to an absent optional dummy argument, as
I want to commit the attached patch:
PR libstdc++/49204
* include/std/future (__future_base::_State_base::wait()): Call
_M_complete_async instead of _M_run_deferred.
(__future_base::_State_base::wait_for()): Call _M_has_deferred and
return future_status.
On Dec 31, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/30/2011 04:34 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
So, I'm wondering why it was done this way originally:
- static int S1; // ERROR - uses same name 9.3
+ static int S1; // { dg-error } uses same name 9.3
and not:
On Nov 25, 2011, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
The numbers I got with your patch (RTL checking) are below, seems
the cumulative numbers other than 100% are all bigger with patched stage2,
which means unfortunately debug info quality degradation.
Not really. I found some actual
Hi,
this implements in a straightforward way the resolution of DR 799 (which
went in CD2): basically a reinterpret_cast to the type of the expression
itself is fine for integral, enumeration, pointer, or pointer-to-member
type. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
/cp
OK.
Jason
On 12/31/2011 03:08 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
this implements in a straightforward way the resolution of DR 799 (which
went in CD2): basically a reinterpret_cast to the type of the expression
itself is fine for integral, enumeration, pointer, or pointer-to-member
type. Tested x86_64-linux.
+
Hi,
On 12/31/2011 03:08 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
this implements in a straightforward way the resolution of DR 799 (which
went in CD2): basically a reinterpret_cast to the type of the expression
itself is fine for integral, enumeration, pointer, or pointer-to-member
type. Tested x86_64-linux.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Revital,
Revital Eres revital.e...@linaro.org writes:
The attached patch is a resubmission following comments made by Ayal
and Richard.
Tested and bootstrap with the other patches in the series on
Ok for google branches.
David
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Dehao Chen de...@google.com wrote:
I see. The patch is updated:
Thanks,
Dehao
Index: ipa-inline.c
===
--- ipa-inline.c (revision 182739)
+++
16 matches
Mail list logo
