Hi!
On 32-bit HWI warning there is a warning about signed (INTVAL) vs. unsigned
({,op_}precision) comparison (on 64-bit HWI that doesn't trigger, as
INTVAL is 64-bit signed long, while precision is 32-bit unsigned).
This patch fixes the warning and makes sure we don't try to optimize
shifts by
Hi!
As the testcase shows, a REAL_CST can appear in MINUS_EXPR as second operand
(that is not canonicalized to PLUS_EXPR of negated value, unlike integer
constants (with exception of minimum value)). The following patch handles
constants there and punts if it isn't SSA_NAME or a constant that
Hi!
Seems I wrote a patch 7.5 years ago for and on the 3.4 branch
(supposedly for a testcase that went latent on the trunk at that time,
due to SSA merge?), and missed the fact that GET_RTX_CLASS changed
on the trunk from characters to enum.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux
Hello Joseph,
Please help to review this new Multilib feature. It intends to provide user
a chance to define their own multilib selection rules. Those rules will be
appended to rules generated by gcc script genmultilib. Thus when gcc can't
find suitable multilib from its own rules, it can fall
2012-08-27 Terry Guo terry@arm.com
* lib/gcc-dg.exp (dg_runtest_extra_prunes): New variable to define
rules
that will be applied to all tests in a .exp file.
(gcc-dg-prune): Include rules defined by the above variable.
* gcc.target/arm/arm.exp
This patch fixes an obvious buffer overflow in c-ada-spec.c:
sprintf (buf, field_%d : aliased , field_num + 1);
where buf was too small. The original buffer was large enough, but then
the above string was made larger (change from field_%d : to
field_%d : aliased without making
-Original Message-
From: Eric Botcazou [mailto:ebotca...@adacore.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:56 PM
To: Terry Guo
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Guenther
Subject: Re: [Patch, test] Enable to prune warnings for tests defined
in one exp file
2012-08-27 Terry
On 10/10/12 02:32, Terry Guo wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Earnshaw
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 10:01 PM
To: Terry Guo
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Patch ARM] Fix that miss DMB instruction for ARMv6-M
On 08/10/12 08:29, Terry Guo wrote:
Hi,
When running
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As the testcase shows, a REAL_CST can appear in MINUS_EXPR as second operand
(that is not canonicalized to PLUS_EXPR of negated value, unlike integer
constants (with exception of minimum value)). The following patch handles
constants there and
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
On 32-bit HWI warning there is a warning about signed (INTVAL) vs. unsigned
({,op_}precision) comparison (on 64-bit HWI that doesn't trigger, as
INTVAL is 64-bit signed long, while precision is 32-bit unsigned).
This
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
Seems I wrote a patch 7.5 years ago for and on the 3.4 branch
(supposedly for a testcase that went latent on the trunk at that time,
due to SSA merge?), and missed the fact that GET_RTX_CLASS changed
on the trunk from
The previous fix for clearing EXPR_LOCATION (and thus LOCATION_BLOCK)
from jump functions was incomplete as it didn't consider sub-expressions.
Fixed as follows.
LTO bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2012-10-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:21:59AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Err, why? Can't we negate a constant, too?
Not all of them, say INT_MIN can't be negated.
Though,
int
foo (int n)
{
int i, d;
for (i = 0, d = 0; i n;
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:21:59AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Err, why? Can't we negate a constant, too?
Not all of them, say INT_MIN can't be negated.
Though,
int
foo
As many have already noticed I changed surenames (but not e-mail
addresses). The following patch adjusts MAINTAINERS.
Unfortunately this donesn't improve the situation with the
too many Richards ;)
Committed.
Richard.
2012-10-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* MAINTAINERS:
On 10/10/12 03:11, Janis Johnson wrote:
On 10/09/2012 07:39 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 27/09/12 01:02, Janis Johnson wrote:
Test gcc.target/arm/div64-unwinding.c is known to fail for GNU/Linux
targets, as described in PR54732. This patch adds an XFAIL.
Tested on arm-none-eabi and
Hi,
On 10/03/2012 11:57 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote:
Testing was done before posting the patch. It was successful.
This change is now in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00418.html
and it looks like is breaking the build for me:
build/genattrtab
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:29:04PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 10/03/2012 11:57 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote:
Testing was done before posting the patch. It was successful.
This change is now in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00418.html
and it looks like is
Hi,
On 10/10/2012 12:53 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Yeah, clearly a different version of the patch has been posted
vs. what has been checked in. The difference is removal of the
(define_cpu_unit bdver1-mult bdver1_mult)
line (present in the posted patch, not in the checked in patch).
Also, the
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de wrote:
Depending on the system mkstemp might create the scratch files with 0666
permission (e.g. glibc = 2.06); for security reasons, it should use 0600.
Thus, one is supposed to set a umask before calling the function (see, e.g.,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:57:09PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/10/2012 12:53 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Yeah, clearly a different version of the patch has been posted
vs. what has been checked in. The difference is removal of the
(define_cpu_unit bdver1-mult bdver1_mult)
line (present in
That was obvious. Sorry for the wrong commit.
Thanks Jakub.
-Ganesh
-Original Message-
From: Paolo Carlini [mailto:paolo.carl...@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 4:33 PM
To: Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh; Uros Bizjak; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
Hi,
The tests gcc.dg/vect/vect-82_64.c and gcc.dg/vect/vect-83_64.c are
failing on powerpc*-*-* (see for instance
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-10/msg01054.html ).
This is fixed with the following patch
diff -up gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-82_64.c
... tested x86_64-linux. Committed to mainline.
Paolo.
2012-10-10 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* include/std/type_traits (__do_common_type_impl): Revert for now
LWG 2141-related change.
*
Hi guys,
Is it ok for release it into trunk and 4.7?
Yes, please do so.
Checked into trunk: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00419.html
and 4.7: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00431.html
Thanks, K
2012/10/10 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com:
... tested x86_64-linux. Committed to mainline.
I'd like to mention that this patch does not reflect what the core
language says, e.g.
static_assert(is_typestd::common_typeint, int, int(), );
Should assert, the correct result being int. The
On 10/10/2012 02:06 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote:
2012/10/10 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com:
... tested x86_64-linux. Committed to mainline.
I'd like to mention that this patch does not reflect what the core
language says, e.g.
static_assert(is_typestd::common_typeint, int, int(), );
The test gcc.dg/pr54782.c uses command line option
-ftree-parallelize-loops=2 which implies -pthread and thus the test fails on
targets that do not support pthread, such as arm-none-eabi.
This patch adds effective target check.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Greta
ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite
2012-10-05
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
It's an incorrect warning from an old version of GCC. Fixed like so.
Bootstrapped and ran libbacktrace testsuite on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline.
Another two in libbackend/elf.c, committed as obvious after
build passed the
On 10 Oct 2012, at 13:17, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com wrote:
The test gcc.dg/pr54782.c uses command line option
-ftree-parallelize-loops=2 which implies -pthread and thus the test fails on
targets that do not support pthread, such as arm-none-eabi.
This patch adds effective target
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:13:06PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/09/2012 04:36 PM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
==36994== Address 0x1003cd2e0 is 16 bytes inside a block of size 536 free'd
==36994==at 0x10001252D: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:430)
==36994==by 0x1003B5CB2: emutls_destroy
Hi,
adding the testcase and closing the PR as fixed in mainline.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
2012-10-10 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/53122
* g++.dg/cpp0x/auto35.C: New.
Index: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto35.C
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Unfortunately this donesn't improve the situation with the
too many Richards ;)
I think you will find it easier to change your given name at the same
time that you are changing your surname, to get all the changes over
As reported in the PR, abi_check fails on Solaris 10 and 11 since about
20120817. On Solaris 10, I get
1 incompatible symbols
0
_ZNSt12system_errorC1ESt10error_codeRKSs
std::system_error::system_error(std::error_code, std::string const)
version status: incompatible
GLIBCXX_3.4.11
type: function
first referenced
symbol in file
dl_iterate_phdr
/var/gcc/gcc-4.8.0-20121010/10-gcc-gas/i386-pc-solaris2.10/./libgo/.libs/libgo.so
ld: fatal: symbol referencing errors. No output written to
/var/gcc/gcc-4.8.0-20121010/10-gcc-gas/gcc/testsuite/go
This moves the location bitpacks to the bitpack pieces and adjust
the weird hooking that is in place currently.
I need to separate tree reference writers from data writers
for some major reorg.
LTO bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2012-10-10 Richard
In the testsuite, distinguish between arm targets that prefer LDRD/STRD and
arm targets that prefer LDM/STM. This patch adds a new effective target test
and updates documentation accordingly.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Greta
ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/
2012-09-13 Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com
Generate prologue/epilogue using STRD/LDRD in ARM mode, when tuning
prefer_ldrd_strd flag is set, such as in Cortex-A15.
[1/3] Prologue using STRD in ARM mode
[2/3] Epilogue using LDRD in ARM mode
[3/3] Adjust tests gcc.target/arm/interrupt-*.c
Testing and benchmarking:
* No regression on qemu
domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) a écrit:
The following tests are failing (with -m32):
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-36.C (test for warnings, line 9)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-36.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-37.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL:
Emit prologue using STRD in ARM mode when tune parameter prefer_ldrd_strd is
set.
ChangeLog
gcc/
2012-09-13 Sameera Deshpande sameera.deshpande at arm.com
Greta Yorsh Greta.Yorsh at arm.com
* config/arm/arm.c (emit_multi_reg_push): New declaration
for an existing
Hi,
FreeBSD has already defined the various Elf_ stuff for 32 and 64-bit
targets.
Currently compilation in libbacktrace fails due to redefinition of these:
- Elf_Ehdr
- Elf_Sym
- Elf_Shdr
I 'fixed' this with ifndef'ing. See below.
Bootstrap passed.
Is something like this ok for trunk?
Generate prologue/epilogue using STRD/LDRD in Thumb mode, when tuning
prefer_ldrd_strd flag is set, such as in Cortex-A15.
[1/4] New RTL patterns for LDRD/STRD in Thumb mode
[2/4] Prologue using STRD in Thumb mode
[3/4] Epilogue using LDRD in Thumb mode
[4/4] Adjust tests
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Solaris 10 Update 10 or sufficiently recent linker patches introduced
dl_iterate_phdr on S10 as a backport from Solaris 11, but unlike S11, it
lives in libdl.so only. The current dl_iterate_phdr check misses
Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu writes:
Have you tried a gcc trunk build on linux configured to use emutls instead
of tls to confirm that this issue is really darwin-specific? These failures
might
also appear on sparc-sun-solaris2.9 but we don't have recent gcc trunk
testresults
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The following patch solves most of LRA scalability problems.
It switches on simpler algorithms in LRA. The first it switches off
trying to reassign hard registers to spilled pseudos (they usually for such
huge functions have long
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Terry Guo wrote:
Hello Joseph,
Please help to review this new Multilib feature. It intends to provide user
Your patch doesn't include documentation for fragments.texi (which needs
to define the semantics without reference to the details of what gcc.c's
internal
As a result of adding LDRD/STRD patterns in Thumb mode, the compiler
generates LDRD/STRD instead of LDM/STM in some cases. This patch adjusts
existing tests to accept LDRD/STRD in addition to LDM/STM.
ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite
2012-09-13 Sameera Deshpande sameera.deshpa...@arm.com
Hi,
in this PR, at variance with the C front-end, we don't check well enough
the aggregate type - in finish_struct_1 - and we ICE later. Then I'm
essentially copying from the C front-end the check. Some details:
1- In these checks, eg, no fields too, the C front-end only warns,
zeroes
The pattern prologue_use is emitted for both prologue and epilogue.
In particular, the assembly comment
@sp needed for prologue
is printed out for both prologue and epilogue.
This patch adds a separate pattern for epilogue_use and replaces
prologue_use with epilogue_use where appropriate.
No
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
This fixes a problem with my PR45844 fix. PR45844 was due to rs6000.c
reg_offset_addressing_ok_p testing the operand mode to determine
whether an insn supports reg+offset addressing, but the VSX splat insn
uses a DF/DI mode
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
2012-10-10 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR middle-end/54862
* simplify-rtx.c (simplify_truncation): Compare UINTVAL instead of
INTVAL of second argument with precision resp. op_precision.
OK. Sorry for the breakage, and thanks for
Torbjorn complained that the GCC bugzilla requires an account. I
committed this patch to the web site to explain why.
Ian
Index: bugs/index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/bugs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.108
diff
On 2012-10-10 09:33 , Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
with at once. Perhaps Rick would be a good choice.
Last name Astley? Include links to videos, please.
Hello Florian,
Let's CC Jason for this optimization patch.
Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com a écrit:
If the size of the inner array elements is 1 and we do not need a
cookie, we do not need to insert an overflow check. This applies to
the relatively frequent new char[n] case.
I just have
On 10/10/2012 06:02 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
I just have one question for own education.
Regarding:
@@ -2450,7 +2450,13 @@
if (array_p TYPE_VEC_NEW_USES_COOKIE (elt_type))
size = size_binop (PLUS_EXPR, size, cookie_size);
else
- cookie_size =
Seems like S M AA is shattering through shorts at the $.09 point and is wired
to take off past $0.15 this week. We should drive these shorters off the
barrier and we will all produce a vast profit on S M AA.
Today: October 10
Name: SMA Alliance
Symbol traded: S M AA
Closed Price: 0.12
Long
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
No before I go an redo the main part of patch #2, I have a question, which
people prefer.
The current code has sequences of:
target_flags |= MASK_FOO; /* set -mfoo */
if
This bootstraps and causes no new regressions on the 4.7 branch.Is
it OK to check this into the 4.7 branch right now?
Thanks
Andrew
Original Message
Subject:PR 54861 - libstdc++ header file typo
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:40:46 -0400
From: Andrew MacLeod
Hi!
This patch folds REDUC_*_EXPR (e.g. on pr54877.c -Ofast -mavx
testcase we end up with unfolded REDUC_PLUS_EXPR till *.optimized).
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2012-10-10 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* fold-const.c (fold_unary_loc): Handle
Hello!
For 64bit targets, we can use mxcsr register to set soft-FP rounding mode.
2012-10-10 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/sfp-machine.h (FP_RND_NEAREST, FP_RND_ZERO, FP_RND_PINF,
FP_RND_MINF, FP_RND_MASK, FP_INIT_ROUNDMODE, _FP_DECL_EX): Move to ...
*
The following patch implements Richard's proposals from lra-lives.c review.
The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev. 192326.
2012-10-10 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
* lra-int.h (lra_live_range_in_p): Remove.
* lra-lives.c
On 10/10/2012 07:16 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
This bootstraps and causes no new regressions on the 4.7 branch.Is
it OK to check this into the 4.7 branch right now?
Yes, thanks.
Paolo.
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
The following patch implements Richard's proposals from lra-lives.c review.
The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev. 192326.
2012-10-10 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
* lra-int.h
On 10.10.12 17:36, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Andreas Tobler andreast-l...@fgznet.ch wrote:
FreeBSD has already defined the various Elf_ stuff for 32 and 64-bit
targets.
Currently compilation in libbacktrace fails due to redefinition of these:
- Elf_Ehdr
-
Sorry, reading back in different surroundings made me notice a couple
of silly errors:
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
E.g.:
if ((*loc = get_equiv_substitution (reg)) != reg)
...as above...
if (*loc != reg || !in_class_p (reg, cl, new_class))
...as above...
On Oct 10, 2012 3:05 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
As reported in the PR, abi_check fails on Solaris 10 and 11 since about
20120817. On Solaris 10, I get
1 incompatible symbols
0
_ZNSt12system_errorC1ESt10error_codeRKSs
std::system_error::system_error(std::error_code, std::string const)
version
I have merged revision 192321 of the gcc 4.7 branch to the gccgo branch,
committed as revision 192330. This brings GCC 4.7.2 and Go 1.0.3 to the
gccgo branch.
This is the last merge I plan to do from 4.7 to the gccgo branch. After
this I plan to start merging from trunk to gccgo branch. The
Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@codesourcery.com writes:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, Richard Sandiford wrote:
So I think this can't really be selected automatically for all cores,
some human-supplied knowledge about the MD unit used is required -- that
obviously affects other operations too, e.g. some
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Andreas Tobler
andreast-l...@fgznet.ch wrote:
On 10.10.12 17:36, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Andreas Tobler andreast-l...@fgznet.ch
wrote:
FreeBSD has already defined the various Elf_ stuff for 32 and 64-bit
targets.
===
Running target unix
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes499
# of unsupported tests 5
/home/howarth/work-gcc/gcc/xgcc version 4.8.0 20121010 (experimental) (GCC)
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local3.C -std=gnu
I have created a temporary branch to host the port of ASAN to
trunk. Wei has done the initial port of the original code from
Kostya. It compiles but we still do not have the runtimes (Wei
is working on that).
I have not touched nor reviewed the code in detail. Right now
I'm interested in
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
I have created a temporary branch to host the port of ASAN to
trunk. Wei has done the initial port of the original code from
Kostya. It compiles but we still do not have the runtimes (Wei
is working on that).
The
...
Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 499
# of unsupported tests5
/home/howarth/work-gcc/gcc/xgcc version 4.8.0 20121010 (experimental) (GCC
On 10.10.12 22:00, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Andreas Tobler
andreast-l...@fgznet.ch wrote:
On 10.10.12 17:36, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Andreas Tobler andreast-l...@fgznet.ch
wrote:
FreeBSD has already defined the various Elf_
On 2012-10-10 16:21 , Diego Novillo wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
I have created a temporary branch to host the port of ASAN to
trunk. Wei has done the initial port of the original code from
Kostya. It compiles but we still do not have the
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
It is also interesting that your IRA range patch results in
different code generation (i can not explain it too now). I saw the same
on a small test (black jack playing and betting strategy).
I haven't looked into
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
* tree-asan.c: New file.
* tree-asan.h: New file.
Nit: do we still need the tree- prefix? IMHO not.
Ciao!
Steven
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
* tree-asan.c: New file.
* tree-asan.h: New file.
Nit: do we still need the tree- prefix? IMHO not.
Richard Biener suggested we use gimple- as
Is there an agreed way for file naming?
David
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
* tree-asan.c: New file.
* tree-asan.h: New file.
Nit: do we still need the tree- prefix? IMHO
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Is there an agreed way for file naming?
It was not my intent to start a bike shed discussion. This was just
something I've been wondering for some time. But AFAIC it's up to
Diegoco to do what they think is right :-)
Ciao!
Steven
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Is there an agreed way for file naming?
It was not my intent to start a bike shed discussion. This was just
something I've been wondering for some time. But
This patch addresses conservative behavior in redundant extend
elimination that was resulting in redundant extends not being
removed.
One of the checks is to ensure that the reaching definition doesn't
feed another extension with a different machine mode.
In this case, the extend we are trying
This patch was committed and ported to google-4_7 branch.
Thanks,
Dehao
gcc/ChangeLog:
2012-10-07 Dehao Chen de...@google.com
* tree-eh.c (lower_try_finally_onedest): Set correct location for
deallocator.
* gimplify.c (gimplify_expr): Set correct location for TRY stmt.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
What I did to address this is to call get_attr_mode from the machine model
to get the actual mode of the insn. In this case, it returns MODE_SI.
There doesn't seem to be any code that maps from the attr_mode (MODE_SI)
On 2012-10-10 16:52 , Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
* tree-asan.c: New file.
* tree-asan.h: New file.
Nit: do we still need the tree- prefix? IMHO
On 9 October 2012 18:49, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
I don't like the sched_yield macro being set there because it's
detected correctly by configure anyway, but I'm not going to labour
that point any more.
Indeed. Then somebody will waste hours in the future wondering why
configure says no
On 9 October 2012 22:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 9 October 2012 20:48, Mark Kettenis wrote:
I think it is. The newlib ctype classification is identical to the
traditional BSD scheme that OpenBSD uses.
OK, I'll commit your patch tomorrow, thanks.
it's on the trunk now, thanks for
On 11 October 2012 00:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 9 October 2012 18:49, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
I don't like the sched_yield macro being set there because it's
detected correctly by configure anyway, but I'm not going to labour
that point any more.
Indeed. Then somebody will waste hours
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
VEC_COND_EXPR is more complicated. We could for instance require that it
takes as first argument a vector of -1 and 0 (thus 0, !=0
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
I would like some clarity. Can I commit this patch?
I'm thinking, yes. I will be making the gengtype changes in time for
stage 1, so further renames can continue after those patches are in.
Jan, Richard? Any strong
From: Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:56:29 +0200
2012-10-02 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
cp/
* cp-tree.h (SIZEOF_EXPR_TYPE_P): Define.
* tree.c (cp_tree_equal): Handle SIZEOF_EXPR with
SIZEOF_EXPR_TYPE_P.
...etc.
Looks like this
The potential savings here didn't seem worth the effort of adding a
pass over another table to assign slots in .debug_addr. In practice,
we're seeing very few slots zeroed out here.
And how many duplicate entries? What strategy does Cary's patch use to
avoid those?
I picked a compilation
The following patch implements most Richard's proposals for LRA
lra-spills.c and lra-coalesce.c files.
The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev. 192341.
2012-10-10 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
* lra-coalesce.c (removed_pseudos_bitmap):
On 12-10-03 7:11 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hi Vlad,
Some comments on lra-spills.c and lra-coalesce.c.
+ The pass creates necessary stack slots and assign spilled pseudos
+ to the stack slots in following way:
s/assign/assigns/
Fixed.
+ (or insn memory constraints) might be not
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
Recent versions of binutils seem to have started putting ' around the version
number in bfd/configure.in, which was confusing gcc configure. This patch
allows us to detect the version number again.
OK for trunk?
I committed my already-approved patch
Hi,
In the expression reassociation pass, statements might get moved
downwards to ensure that dependences are not violated after
reassociation. This can increase the live range and, in a tight loop,
result in spills. This patch simply does a code motion of those
statements involved in
Hi,
I'm committing the testcase and closing the PR as fixed. Tested
x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2012-10-10 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/43663
* g++.dg/init/bitfield3.C: New.
Index: g++.dg/init/bitfield3.C
In a different thread, I proposed the following alternative to 'try_xxx':
templatetypename T T* symbol::cast_to(symbol* p) {
if (p-isT())
return static_castT*(p);
return 0;
}
cast:
templatetypename T T symbol:as(symbol* p) {
assert(p-isT())
return static_castT(*p);
}
David
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
On 9/19/12, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Sep 19, 2012 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. Btw, can we not provide a specialization for
dynamic_cast ? This -try_...
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@googlers.com wrote:
So, Jan Hubicka requested and approved the current spelling.
100 matches
Mail list logo
