On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/17/2012 10:30 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
For each component of a vector type,
result[i] = if MSB of c[i] is set ? b[i] : a[i].
Curious. Do you know why they produce and expect -1 for true? It certainly
seems to be a deliberate design choice, so
On 10/17/2012 11:15 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
In the middle-end, VEC_COND_EXPR is documented to take a vector of 0 and
-1, and at expansion time, it gives vcond(x0,y,z) to the target if its
first argument is not a comparison.
Maybe we should leave the first argument alone and let the middle end
Hi,
This patch fixes a problem with the new dump infrastructure as discussed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-10/msg00227.html.
It removes a check for current_function_decl so that dumps will work
for IPA passes. In addition, this patch also adds a new inline
function to check if any dump files
Hi,
On 10/18/2012 03:17 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Hmm, I thought I fixed a very similar bug recently.
I'm concerned that this change will cause problems with brace-elision
situations. But then again, can we have a zero-length array followed
by anything else?
If I understand correctly your
as per LWG comments on N330[2-5].
Couple of notes: new fail has been temporarily worked around pending
the resolution of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54968
For tuple, the big fun remaining is piecewise_construct_t, which
should allow tie and forward_as_tuple to be
Hi,
this patch adds new intrinsics for fxsave, fxsave64, xsave, xsave64,
xsaveopt and xsaveopt64 instructions
Bootstrapped on x86-64
Is it ok for trunk?
Changelog entry:
2012-10-16 Alexander Ivchenko alexander.ivche...@intel.com
* gcc/common/config/i386/i386-common.c
Hi Vlad,
newlib failed to build for mipsisa32-elf because of a case in which a
call-crossing pseudo P had been allocated a call-clobbered register and
in which LRA hadn't inserted the save and restore. We then tripped the
lra-assigns.c sanity check for this situation (thanks for adding that
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
zad...@naturalbridge.com wrote:
Richi,
I apologize for the size of this patch, but it only does one very small
thing, it is just that it does it all over the middle end.
This patch introduces a new api for extracting a signed or unsigned hwi
Hi,
This adds command line options and basic pre-defined macro support for
ARMv8 in the AArch32 port. Tested on trunk with arm-linux-gnueabi cross,
no regressions.
Applied.
regards,
Ramana
2012-10-17 Matthew Gretton-Dann matthew.gretton-d...@arm.com
* config/arm/lib1funcs.S
This makes us stream TREE_OVERFLOW INTEGER_CSTs the normal way
(and thus possibly allow pickle refs to them). Shared INTEGER_CSTs
which are special use LTO_integer_cst now instead of the weird
special-casing of the LTO tag for INTEGER_CST.
LTO bootstrapped and tested on
Hi,
This patch originally by Matt, adds support for the fma intrinsics in
arm_neon.h at the correct architecture levels.
Tested on arm-linux-gnueabi with no regressions.
Applied,
cheers
Ramana
2012-10-18 Matthew Gretton-Dann matthew.gretton-d...@arm.com
Ramana
This documents __AVR_ARCH__ built-in macro that was missing up to now.
Pointer to --help=target is removed because the documentation of -mmcu= is
complete.
Ok to apply?
Johann
* doc/invoke.texi (AVR Options): Document __AVR_ARCH__.
Note __AVR_device__ is not defined for cores.
Hi!
This patch improves debug info quality in two small changes.
One is that for DEBUG stmts like DEBUG p = MEM[a, 8] for
a non-addressable we were giving up instead of creating DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR
(plus 8) for it. The reason is
if (GET_CODE (op0) == DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR
||
On 10/18/12 13:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
Applied,
And this time with the patch.
RamanaFrom ae8086e2d1ecae8fee711942d4b530947001e8ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:40:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] neon fma
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
This patch improves debug info quality in two small changes.
One is that for DEBUG stmts like DEBUG p = MEM[a, 8] for
a non-addressable we were giving up instead of creating DEBUG_IMPLICIT_PTR
(plus 8) for it. The
On 10/18/2012 06:22 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
zad...@naturalbridge.com wrote:
Richi,
I apologize for the size of this patch, but it only does one very small
thing, it is just that it does it all over the middle end.
This patch introduces a new
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
These two tests currently fail if using gold, in the first instance
because powerpc64 gold doesn't support mixing old dot-sym objects
with new objects, and in the second instance because gold doesn't have
a --no-toc-sort
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
zad...@naturalbridge.com wrote:
On 10/18/2012 06:22 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
zad...@naturalbridge.com wrote:
Richi,
I apologize for the size of this patch, but it only does one very small
Hi!
Dodji reported to me an ICE about NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK in a middle
of a bb. The following patch (cfgexpand.c hunk) fixes that.
I then run asan cc1/cc1plus with -O2 -fasan on a portion of cc1files
and got other ICEs, which is the reason for the two asan.c changes
- one was that base wasn't
This is the first of two patches needed to get a clean bootstrap on
x86_64-linux-gnu with RTL checking enabled. It simply stops us from
pushing notes, barriers, etc. onto the stack, which then trigger a
checking failure when we try to access their patterns later.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK
Another simple patch for an rtl checking problem. We were trying to
apply REGNO to something that was no longer a register (because of
equiv substitution).
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK for lra branch?
Richard
gcc/
* lra-constraints.c (check_and_process_move): Only apply REGNO
On 10/10/12 16:03, Greta Yorsh wrote:
This patch adds define_insn patterns for LDRD and STRD in Thumb mode.
ChangeLog
gcc/
2012-09-13 Sameera Deshpande sameera.deshpa...@arm.com
Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com
* config/arm/arm-protos.h (offset_ok_for_ldrd_strd): New
This fixes all warnings from the machine description (mostly these
were missing modes).
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux; no regressions. The
testsuite covers all changed patterns.
Okay for mainline?
Segher
2012-10-18 Segher Boessenkool seg...@kernel.crashing.org
*
On 10/10/12 16:03, Greta Yorsh wrote:
Generate prologue using STRD when prefer_ldrd_strd is set in tune_params.
ChangeLog
gcc/
2012-09-13 Sameera Deshpande sameera.deshpa...@arm.com
Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com
* config/arm/arm.c (thumb2_emit_strd_push): New
you know richi, i did not know who i was actually talking to. i said
who is this richard beiner person and then i saw the email address.
On 10/18/2012 08:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
zad...@naturalbridge.com wrote:
On 10/18/2012 06:22 AM,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
This fixes all warnings from the machine description (mostly these
were missing modes).
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux; no regressions. The
testsuite covers all changed patterns.
Okay for
The attached patch implements avoids conservative behavior in REE by allowing
removal of redundant extends when the def feeds another extend with a different
mode. This works because in merge_def_and_ext only calls combine_set_extension
if the candidate for removal has a wider mode than the def
Hi Tobias,
The patch to fortran/cpp.c looks like a very worthy bit of
housekeeping but doesn't seem to me to have much to do with PR54844
:-)
The rest is fine and is OK for trunk.
Thanks for the fix.
Paul
On 17 October 2012 12:02, Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de wrote:
In GCC 4.8, module
Ping ^ 2.
On 10/09/2012 09:44 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
Ping.
On 10/04/2012 03:45 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
Hi All,
Currently the gcc-{ar,nm,ranlib} utilities assume that binutils is in
path when invoking the wrapped binutils program. This goes against the
accepted practice in GCC to find
2012-10-17 Michael Meissner meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/rs6000.opt (rs6000_isa_flags): New flag word to
replace target_flags that gives us 63 possible switches.
(x_rs6000_isa_flags): Save area for rs6000_isa_flags.
(x_rs6000_isa_flags_explicit):
An unused variable left in except.c after Easwaran's recent patch.
Tested on ia64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline as obvious.
2012-10-18 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
* except.c (sjlj_emit_function_enter): Remove unused variable.
--
Eric BotcazouIndex: except.c
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
this patch adds new intrinsics for fxsave, fxsave64, xsave, xsave64,
xsaveopt and xsaveopt64 instructions
Bootstrapped on x86-64
Is it ok for trunk?
Changelog entry:
2012-10-16 Alexander Ivchenko
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
Dodji reported to me an ICE about NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK in a middle
of a bb. The following patch (cfgexpand.c hunk) fixes that.
I then run asan cc1/cc1plus with -O2 -fasan on a portion of cc1files
and got other ICEs,
OLÁ, VENHO ATRAVÉS DESTE E-MAIL APRESENTAR O DATA STUDIO:
PARA CONSULTAS DE ORÇAMENTOS DE JINGLES, SPOTS, VINHETAS, LOCUÇÕES E TAMBÉM
CONVERSÃO DE VINIL E CASSETE PARA CD E VHS PARA DVD, BASTA ENTRAR EM CONTATO
POR ESTE E-MAIL OU PELO SITE.
QUEM TIVER INTERESSE TENHO UM PORTIFÓLIO DE AUDIO NO
On 10/18/2012 01:15 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
If I understand correctly your hesitations, I don't think there are
exceptions to the general rule that if the size of the array is zero
there can be no initializers.
I'm thinking of a testcase like this, which is currently accepted:
struct A
{
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
this patch adds new intrinsics for fxsave, fxsave64, xsave, xsave64,
xsaveopt and xsaveopt64 instructions
Bootstrapped on x86-64
Is it
This patch changes folding in fold_sign_changed_comparison in a way
that when we have pointer/non-pointer comparison, we give up folding
here. The issue is e.g. when we have (intptr_t) MEM[(void *)x + 4B]
== (intptr_t) y and forwprop wants to fold this one via
fold_binary_loc--we then end up
Joseph,
In this rather long reply, I have attempted to collect all your
recent feedback, and to provide a response where possible.
JSM: On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Gary Funck wrote:
JSM: GF: Various UPC language related checks and operations
JSM: GF: are called in the C front-end and middle-end.
JSM:
Hi,
This adjusts the existing A15 scheduler description to support Neon.
Tested on arm-linux-gnueabi cross. Applied to trunk.
regards,
Ramana
2012-10-18 Matthew Gretton-Dann matthew.gretton-d...@arm.com
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com
Sameera
Hi Tobias,
The patch to fortran/cpp.c looks like a very worthy bit of
housekeeping but doesn't seem to me to have much to do with PR54844
:-)
The rest is fine and is OK for trunk.
Thanks for the fix.
Paul
On 17 October 2012 12:02, Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de wrote:
In GCC 4.8, module
Hi,
testcase added, PR closed as fixed in mainline.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2012-10-18 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/29633
* g++.dg/template/pr29633.C: New.
Index: g++.dg/template/pr29633.C
On 10/18/2012 06:02 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/18/2012 01:15 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
If I understand correctly your hesitations, I don't think there are
exceptions to the general rule that if the size of the array is zero
there can be no initializers.
I'm thinking of a testcase like
This patch replaces all instances of INT_CST_LT and INT_CST_LT_UNSIGNED
with
the new functions tree_int_cst_lts_p and tree_int_cst_ltu_p. With the
new implementation of int_cst these functions will be too big to do inline.
This is a small patch that has no prerequisites.
Tested on x86-64.
Ping! Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Greta Yorsh [mailto:greta.yo...@arm.com]
Sent: 10 October 2012 15:28
To: GCC Patches
Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw; ni...@redhat.com;
p...@codesourcery.com; Greta Yorsh; mikest...@comcast.net;
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de;
Hi!
This patch silences the following warning:
../../../../gcc/gcc/config/sh/sh.c:9455:1: warning: /* within comment
[-Wcomment]
Comitted as obvious.
MfG, JBG
2012-10-18 Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de
gcc/
* config/sh/sh.c: Fix comment to silence warning.
diff --git
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:39:52PM -0700, Wei Mi wrote:
--- gcc/gcc.c (revision 192487)
+++ gcc/gcc.c (working copy)
@@ -679,6 +679,7 @@ proper position among the other output f
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 09:46:36AM -0700, Wei Mi wrote:
--- gcc/gcc.c (revision 192567)
+++ gcc/gcc.c (working copy)
@@ -679,6 +679,7 @@ proper position among the other output f
%{fgnu-tm:%:include(libitm.spec)%(link_itm)}\
%(mflib) STACK_SPLIT_SPEC \
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:15:33AM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
--- Makefile.def (revision 192487)
+++ Makefile.def (working copy)
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ target_modules = { module= libstdc++-v3;
lib_path=src/.libs;
raw_cxx=true; };
This adds a warning switch for the existing returning address of
local variable warnings in the C and C++ FEs which are enabled by
default but have no switch controlling them. Adding a switch allows it
to be turned into an error with -Werror=return-local-addr. I've added
two tests checking the
On 18 October 2012 17:30:20 Meador Inge mead...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Ping ^ 2
Been a while but wasn't --with-build-sysroot for exactly this?
On 10/09/2012 09:44 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
Ping.
On 102012 03:45 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
Hi All,
Currently the gcc-{ar,nm,ranlib} utilities
The recent introduction of virtual locations revealed a weak spot in the
implementation of -fdump-ada-spec.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline as obvious.
2012-10-18 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
* c-ada-spec.c (LOCATION_COL): Delete.
2012-10-17 Michael Meissner meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/rs6000.opt (rs6000_isa_flags): New flag word to
replace target_flags that gives us 63 possible switches.
(x_rs6000_isa_flags): Save area for rs6000_isa_flags.
(x_rs6000_isa_flags_explicit):
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:15:33AM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
--- Makefile.def (revision 192487)
+++ Makefile.def (working copy)
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ target_modules = { module= libstdc++-v3;
Hi again,
On 10/18/2012 06:02 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/18/2012 01:15 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
If I understand correctly your hesitations, I don't think there are
exceptions to the general rule that if the size of the array is zero
there can be no initializers.
I'm thinking of a
+ kcc the author of the libasan library.
Koystya, does libasan build (need to ) depend on C++ library ?
thanks,
David
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
@@ -1360,12 +1369,20 @@ shorten_branches (rtx first ATTRIBUTE_UN
else
inner_length = insn_current_length (inner_insn);
- if (inner_length != insn_lengths[inner_uid])
+ /* We
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Gary Funck wrote:
GUPC (then called GCC/UPC) dates back to the GCC 2.7 and GCC 2.95 days.
The GCC 2.7 based implementation was a prototype, and the GCC 2.95 version
was a first attempt to implement a UPC compiler that fits within the GCC
build framework. At the time, we
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 09:46:36AM -0700, Wei Mi wrote:
--- gcc/gcc.c (revision 192567)
+++ gcc/gcc.c (working copy)
@@ -679,6 +679,7 @@ proper position among the other output f
On 10/18/2012 11:12 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/17/2012 10:05 PM, François Dumont wrote:
Ok to commit ?
Ok, thanks.
Paolo.
Attached patch applied.
2012-10-18 François Dumont fdum...@gcc.gnu.org
* include/debug/formatter.h (_Debug_msg_id): Add
__msg_valid_load_factor.
*
On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Dominique Dhumieres domi...@lps.ens.fr wrote:
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c2012-10-18 00:34:51.0 +0200
+++ ../work/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c2012-10-18 08:55:28.0
+0200
@@ -1123,6 +1123,7 @@ static const struct attribute_spec
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
The fact that we even have shared unique ids is pretty bad -- and surely
a contradiction in terms -- but I think both ways of handling them rely
on the length being the same for all copies. If we don't record a length
(your version), we
The following patch solves a wrong code generation for SPEC2000
galgel on x86. The reason of the failure was in wrong assignment after
live range splitting which resulted in dead code elimination. Wrong
assignment was a result of that LRA trusts allocation of IRA based on
LIVE info
On 10/18/2012 05:28 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hi Vlad,
newlib failed to build for mipsisa32-elf because of a case in which a
call-crossing pseudo P had been allocated a call-clobbered register and
in which LRA hadn't inserted the save and restore. We then tripped the
lra-assigns.c sanity
On 10/18/2012 09:33 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Another simple patch for an rtl checking problem. We were trying to
apply REGNO to something that was no longer a register (because of
equiv substitution).
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK for lra branch?
Yes. Thanks, Richard.
On Oct 18, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com wrote:
Ping! Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Greta Yorsh [mailto:greta.yo...@arm.com]
Sent: 10 October 2012 15:28
To: GCC Patches
Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw; ni...@redhat.com;
p...@codesourcery.com;
Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com writes:
Quoting Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com:
The fact that we even have shared unique ids is pretty bad -- and surely
a contradiction in terms -- but I think both ways of handling them rely
on the length being the same for all copies.
I should get some of the allocator work out of my git tree while we're
in stage 1, this is for forward_list.
* include/bits/forward_list.h: Add C++11 allocator support.
* include/bits/forward_list.tcc: Likewise.
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml: Update.
*
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the review.
Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com writes:
-476,34 +468,36 @@ store_bit_field_1 (rtx str_rtx, unsigne
}
/* If the target is a register, overwriting the entire object, or storing
- a full-word or multi-word field can be done with just a SUBREG. +
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Partnering the store_bit_field_1 patch that I just posted, this patch
tidies up the extract_bit_field code in the same way.
There is one deliberate behavioural change here. The old code had a
single check for cases where the extraction
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
2012-10-17 Michael Meissner meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/rs6000.opt (rs6000_isa_flags): New flag word to
replace target_flags that gives us 63 possible switches.
(x_rs6000_isa_flags): Save
Hello!
Attached patch moves a pack of duplicated code from i386.md to i386.c.
No functional change.
2012-10-18 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.md (rdpmc): Remove expander.
(rdtsc): Ditto.
(rdtscp): Ditto.
(rdpmc): Rename from *rdpmc.
OK.
Jason
Hi,
During expression reassociation, statements are conservatively moved
downwards to ensure that dependences are correctly satisfied after
reassocation. This could lead to lengthening of live ranges. This
patch moves statements only to the extent necessary. Bootstraps and no
test regression on
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 05:35:39PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
2012-10-17 Michael Meissner meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/rs6000.opt (rs6000_isa_flags): New flag word to
replace target_flags
On 10/16/12 20:33, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/16/12 13:28, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
location of considered if-conversion on mem
if (some_condition)
call ();
mem = something;
Are we not currently being
-Original Message-
From: Georg-Johann Lay
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:08 AM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Denis Chertykov; Weddington, Eric
Subject: [Patch,avr] Document __AVR_ARCH__
This documents __AVR_ARCH__ built-in macro that was missing up to now.
Pointer to
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
2012-10-18 Michael Meissner meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/rs6000-cpus.def (POWERPC_MASKS): Don't assume
OPTION_MASK_STRICT_ALIGN is defined.
(MASK_STRICT_ALIGN): If
The following is small bug fix caught during testing. The shadow value
for redzone can be negative, so the shadow type must be signed for the
check to succeed.
Ok for the branch?
thanks,
David
Index: asan.c
===
--- asan.c
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Bottom line: This is a bug in df_kill_notes.
Yep, and it could cause wrong code generation, couldn't it? Because the
new (reg:DI 72) is obviously not equal to
thanks. If libasan is statically linked in (which is the case for
clang), removing the dependency on libstdc++ is a must.
David
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Kostya Serebryany k...@google.com wrote:
+few more folks
libasan does not (and should not) depend on libstdc++-v3.
In llvm build
The following patch implements some Richard Sandiford's review of LRA.
The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86-64/x86.
Committed as rev. 192601.
2012-10-18 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
* lra-int.h (lra_special_reload_pseudos): Remove.
On 12-10-17 7:24 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Thanks for all the updates.
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
+ /* index * scale + disp = new base + index * scale */
+ enum reg_class cl = base_reg_class (mode, as, SCRATCH, SCRATCH);
+
+ lra_assert
On 12-10-15 8:06 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
if that's accurate. I dropped the term reload pseudo because of
the general comment in my earlier reply about the use of reload pseudo
when the code seems to include inheritance and split pseudos too.
83 matches
Mail list logo
