The problem here is that we end up with an INDIRECT_REF TREE_CODE with a
null TREE_TYPE in lvalue_kind. Is this possible at that point, or does
it point to a deeper underlying problem?
Bootstraped and tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
2012-10-27 Markus Trippelsdorf mar...@trippelsdorf.de
Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/26/2012 01:37 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
cp_next_tokens_can_be_std_attribute_p (cp_parser *parser)
{
- return cp_nth_tokens_can_be_std_attribute_p (parser, 1);
+ cp_token *token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser-lexer);
+
+ return (cxx_dialect
Hello!
Attached patch adds a testcase for RA problem that was fixed by LRA.
2012-10-27 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/34283
* gcc.target/i386/pr34283.c: New test.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed to mainline SVN.
Uros.
Index: gcc.target/i386/pr34283.c
Hello,
Consider this short example:
templatetypename T
struct X { };
templatetypename T
using Y = const XT;
using Z = Yint;
G++ crashes in lookup_class_template_1 while trying to build the alias
template instantiation Yint.
I think this is indirectly due to the fact
On 25 April 2012 13:54, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
On 25 April 2012 00:01, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Wshadow warns whenever any declaration shadows a
Am 27.10.2012 01:41, schrieb Andreas Schwab:
Thomas Koenig tkoe...@netcologne.de writes:
Index: trans.c
===
--- trans.c (revision 192638)
+++ trans.c (working copy)
@@ -814,26 +814,23 @@ gfc_allocate_allocatable
Hello!
As suggested by Richard S. [1], after the patch that converts subreg:M
(op:N (...)(...)) to op:M (subreg:M (...) subreg:M (...)), we can
remove several peephole2 patterns that handle subregs of PLUS, MINUS
and MULT operators. I have attached RFC prototype patch that will
trigger an ICE
On 10/26/2012 10:41 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/25/2012 10:15 PM, François Dumont wrote:
Here is the patch to apply the same modification applied to
unordered_set and unordered_multiset. It also use default
implementation for unordered_set/unordered_multiset copy/move
Hello,
I've committed the obvious fix for PR 55042 as rev 192877.
Cheers,
Oleg
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/55042
* config/sh/sh.c (sh1_builtin_p): Comment out unused function.
Index: gcc/config/sh/sh.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=192878
Applied as obvios.
Johann
PR target/55034
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_out_lpm): Remove unused regno_dest.
I doubt this has been an FAQ in the last decade. :-) Applied.
Gerald
2012-10-27 Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com
* faq.html (My program seems to hang): Remove.
Index: faq.html
===
RCS file:
Bootstrapped (c,c++) on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
Committed as obvious.
2012-10-27 Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
* lra-assigns.c (find_hard_regno_for): Fix use of WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN.
Index: lra-assigns.c
===
---
Thomas Koenig tkoe...@netcologne.de writes:
PR fortran/54833
* trans.c (gfc_call_free): Do not wrap the
call to __builtin_free in check for NULL.
(gfc_deallocate_with_status): For automatic deallocation without
status for non-coarrays, don't wrap call
On 19 October 2012 18:17, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
documentation but I can also implement -Wformat=0 being an alias for
-Wno-format and -Wformat=1 an alias for -Wformat and simply reject
-Wno-format=.
I think that's
More mostly easy conversions to LangEnabledBy. Regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
OK?
2012-10-27 Manuel López-Ibáñez m...@gcc.gnu.org
PR c/53063
c-family/
* c.opt(Warray-bounds,Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor,Wenum-compare,
Wmain,Woverlength-strings,
Hi Andreas,
Thomas Koenig tkoe...@netcologne.de writes:
PR fortran/54833
* trans.c (gfc_call_free): Do not wrap the
call to __builtin_free in check for NULL.
(gfc_deallocate_with_status): For automatic deallocation without
status for non-coarrays,
Thomas Koenig tkoe...@netcologne.de writes:
Does not happen on the architectures that I used, and I do not
have access to that architecture.
A cross compiler is enough.
Does a (rougly) equivalent C case compile?
How does a (rougly) equivalent C case look like?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab,
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
How does a (rougly) equivalent C case look like?
Usually something can be constructed from the -fdump-tree-gimple dump.
Ciao!
Steven
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Dehao Chen de...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
I've updated the patch:
1. abandon the changes in cfgexpand.c
2. set the block for trees when lowering gimple stmt.
3. add a unittest.
Index: gcc/gimple-low.c
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Dehao Chen de...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
I've updated the patch:
1. abandon the changes in cfgexpand.c
2. set the block for trees when lowering gimple stmt.
3. add a unittest.
Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
How does a (rougly) equivalent C case look like?
Usually something can be constructed from the -fdump-tree-gimple dump.
Doesn't look like.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab,
Applied, based an another reminder of these two no longer being
synonymous.
Gerald
2012-10-27 Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com
* done.html: Adjust URL for rhug.
Index: done.html
===
RCS file:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
2012-10-27 Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com
* done.html: Adjust URL for rhug.
And here is a fix for a long standing issue...
Gerald
Index: done.html
===
RCS file:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 12-10-13 11:37 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
LIVE is not used on purpose. I added LIVE usage to the old RA about 10
years ago (it was before DF-infrastructure). Everything was ok until,
somebody reported compiler crash on semantically
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
So I'm going to revert this patch.
Or actually better, this lighter-weight patch. Will commit after the
usual testing.
* ira.c (ira): Remove DF_LIVE if the problem is in the stack.
(do_reload): Add it back at the end.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
As suggested by Richard S. [1], after the patch that converts subreg:M
(op:N (...)(...)) to op:M (subreg:M (...) subreg:M (...)), we can
remove several peephole2 patterns that handle subregs of PLUS, MINUS
and MULT
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 4:36 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
As suggested by Richard S. [1], after the patch that converts subreg:M
(op:N (...)(...)) to op:M (subreg:M (...) subreg:M (...)), we can
remove
With the lra branch merged, I had to update the patch, because of new uses of
HAVE_ATTTR_enabled. While looking at the conflicts, I also found that it
was often hard to tell if macros were used for performance reasons, or
just because there was no other interface available. lra itself is
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:27 PM, David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
I'm getting a SIGBUS on every backtrace libbacktrace generates
on 32-bit sparc builds. The crashes usually happen in
add_function_range(), where 'p' is not 8-byte aligned.
It seems that the vector code doesn't take
From: Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:06:59 -0700
The struct used by add_function_range is
struct function_addrs
{
uint64_t low;
uint64_t high;
struct function *function;
};
So on a 32-bit system, this should have a size of 20 if uint64_t
requires
From: David Miller da...@davemloft.net
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 00:31:27 -0400 (EDT)
The size is 24, and my patch definitely makes the crashes go away.
It seems like a vector is being used for a mixed set of objects.
I'll try to figure out how that is happening.
Ok, the problem seems to have
31 matches
Mail list logo
