On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Konstantin Serebryany
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The attached patch is the libsanitizer merge from upstream r175042.
>>
>> Lots of changes. Among other things:
>> - x86_64 linux: change the shadow offset to 0x7fff8000
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:17:27PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > This patch backports the asan_test.cc changes since 2013-01-10 from
> > upstream. Unfortunately, it seems the tests can't really go standalone,
> > the 3
Thanks!
This'll let us think about fixing 7fff8000+prelink w/o a rush.
Still, can we switch to using asan-rt in
ASAN_FLEXIBLE_MAPPING_AND_OFFSET=1 mode?
This way we will have fewer differences between gcc variant and upstream
and will be able to change the offset w/o changing the rt at all.
(and t
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:17:27PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > This patch backports the asan_test.cc changes since 2013-01-10 from
>> > upstream. Unfortuna
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:19:14PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Here is the patch, works just fine for me here during asan.exp testing.
> You can very easily either install and enable prelink on one of your
> x86_64-linux testing boxes, or just install it and add test that
> will say prelink -r 0x
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> Add class record_builder to ease construction of records and unions. Use it
> in some appropriate places.
>
> Nathan please review the vxworks changes.
>
> tree.h
> New class record_builder.
>
> tree.c
> Implement record_bui
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Hurugalawadi, Naveen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please consider this as a gentle reminder to review the patch
> posted at following link:-
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00823.html
>
> Please review the patch and let me know if its okay?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard
Chao-Ying Fu writes:
> Hello All,
>
> Once in a while we got reports about programs (ex: WebKit, FireFox)
> crash due to ldc1/sdc1 unaligned accesses on MIPS targets. The root
> cause is that programmers neglect the alignment issue and cast
> arbitrary pointers to point to double variables.
>
>
The new gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr53948.c test was failing on Solaris with
Sun as: i386 uses / as comment character, while sparc uses !. The
following patch accounts for that.
Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.10, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, installed on mainline.
Rainer
This patch undoes the patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-01/msg00219.html which doesn't fix
the original problem. (The ICE only occurs if the function is not an
internal or module procedure!)
As Paul's variant (cf. PR) fixes the issue, this patch now undoes my
patch and uses his. Additi
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:41:30AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> > I agree with David that it might be better to give up pch.
>>
>> That'd be a really a good start.
>
> You can do it with say following patch instead, PCH is just a compile
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:19:22AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:41:30AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> >> > I agree with David that it might be better to give up pch.
> >>
> >> That'd be a really a good start.
Thank you Gerald!
Committed with the changes.
Regards
Ganesh
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:ger...@pfeifer.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 2:40 PM
To: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
Cc: gcc-patchesUros Bizjak
Subject: RE: [patch][wwwdocs] gcc 4.8 changes - AMD new co
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:33 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> The AIX system supports DWARF debugging, but GCC does not generate it
> on AIX and GDB does not consume it on AIX.
Is there a description for what has to be done in GCC to enable DWARF
with AIX as/ld? E.g. is it required to support the ".dw
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 01:04:04PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> 2013-02-13 Richard Biener
>
> PR lto/50494
> * varasm.c (output_constant_def_1): Get the decl representing
> the constant as argument.
> (output_constant_def): Wrap output_constant_def_1.
> (make_dec
Rainer Orth writes:
> The new gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr53948.c test was failing on Solaris with
> Sun as: i386 uses / as comment character, while sparc uses !. The
> following patch accounts for that.
>
> Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.10, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, installe
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 01:04:04PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > 2013-02-13 Richard Biener
> >
> > PR lto/50494
> > * varasm.c (output_constant_def_1): Get the decl representing
> > the constant as argument.
> > (output_constant_de
The patch seems to work on a simple test. Let me digest it.
I am trying to understand if there are problems with it other than the
added complexity (which is what I don't like the most).
-Wl,-Ttext-segment=0x36 does not work with binutils-gold.
gold understands -Wl,-Ttext=0x36, but
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> Note that tag_name does not allow the way C++ uses this (it can be
> a TYPE_DECL).
>
> Overall I'm not sure this is a good abstraction unless you manage to
> make the frontends use it.
I think that is a mistake. This is a pure gimple faci
Hi jason,
The test g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C:6:31: error:
declaration of 'void abort() throw ()' has
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:53:47PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > (completely untested). Because, if we force the constant to be aligned
> > more than it would be by default, the RTL optimizers should be told about
> > that too.
>
> At the moment the vectorizer refuses to bump alignment for any
Hello,
Building a cross-compiler from powerpc-linux to powerpc-aix fails with:
../../combined/gcc/collect2.c: In function 'void scan_prog_file(const
char*, scanpass, scanfilter)':
../../combined/gcc/collect2.c:2860:8: error: 'F_LOADONLY' was not
declared in this scope
This is due to:
2013-02-03
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:55:47PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
> The patch seems to work on a simple test. Let me digest it.
> I am trying to understand if there are problems with it other than the
> added complexity (which is what I don't like the most).
Yes, it is some added complexity,
On 02/13/13 16:17, John David Anglin wrote:
On 2013-02-13 3:33 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
Perhaps Dave can explain what would have to be done to move this
platform to DWARF2...?
I had looked at this a bit in the past. I don't think it's that
difficult to add DWARF2 support to GCC on hppa. Al
On 02/14/13 03:52, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
No, it prevents *reading* of PCH files with -gstabs, so whatever you write
into the PCH file is uninteresting. The patch can surely be acompanied
by a patch to warn that writing a PCH file is useless in that case, as in
your patch, though the spot you cho
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
>> Note that tag_name does not allow the way C++ uses this (it can be
>> a TYPE_DECL).
>>
>> Overall I'm not sure this is a good abstraction unless you manage to
>> make the fronten
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Building a cross-compiler from powerpc-linux to powerpc-aix fails with:
>
> ../../combined/gcc/collect2.c: In function 'void scan_prog_file(const
> char*, scanpass, scanfilter)':
> ../../combined/gcc/collect2.c:2860:8: error: 'F_
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:55:47PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
>> The patch seems to work on a simple test. Let me digest it.
>> I am trying to understand if there are problems with it other than the
>> added complexity (which is what
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> Because it's otherwise almost unused. No "usual" gimple pass builds
> up record types. What's the point in introducing the abstraction if
> most of the users cannot use it?
There may be few users on the gimple side, but you are mixing tw
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
>> Because it's otherwise almost unused. No "usual" gimple pass builds
>> up record types. What's the point in introducing the abstraction if
>> most of the users cannot use it?
>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Building a cross-compiler from powerpc-linux to powerpc-aix fails with:
>
> ../../combined/gcc/collect2.c: In function 'void scan_prog_file(const
> char*, scanpass, scanfilter)':
> ../../combined/gcc/collect2.c:2860:8: error: 'F_
On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:33 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> The AIX system supports DWARF debugging, but GCC does not generate it
>> on AIX and GDB does not consume it on AIX.
>
> Is there a description for what has to be done in GCC to enabl
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:33 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> The AIX system supports DWARF debugging, but GCC does not generate it
>>> on AIX and GDB does not consume it on AIX.
>>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Because it's otherwise almost unused. No "usual" gimple pass builds
>>> up record types. What's the point in introd
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:48:01PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Rainer Orth writes:
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr53948.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr53948.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> /* Test that we have line information for the line
> with local variable initializatio
This patch sets attribute "predicable" to "yes" for patterns that handle add
with carry and already use %? in their output statements.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Greta
gcc/
2013-02-14 Greta Yorsh
* config/arm/arm.md (addsi3_carryin_): Set attribute
"predicable" to yes.
(ad
When we have a lambda-expression in the initializer for a specialization
of a class template static data member, we end up in
maybe_process_partial_specialization, which sees that
processing_specialization is set and concludes that we're trying to
specialize the lambda. But we aren't.
Tested
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Is there a description for what has to be done in GCC to enable DWARF
>> with AIX as/ld? E.g. is it required to support the ".dwsect" pseudo?
>> Is there already a plan from someone to make GCC produce DWARF on
>> AIX7?
>
> Yes, you need to
This patch fixes the matmul bug, which was reported this morning.
Seemingly, the code never worked correctly.
Regarding the result patch: Mikael and I came independently to the same
result thus it must be right (or not?); additionally, I tested and found
out that matrix-scalar/scalar-matrix wa
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> This patch fixes the matmul bug, which was reported this morning. Seemingly,
> the code never worked correctly.
>
> Regarding the result patch: Mikael and I came independently to the same
> result thus it must be right (or not?); additionally
On Feb 14, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>> Is there a description for what has to be done in GCC to enable DWARF
>>> with AIX as/ld? E.g. is it required to support the ".dwsect" pseudo?
>>> Is there already a plan from someone
Hi,
a call to the builtin __atomic_thread_fence with the memory model
__ATOMIC_RELEASE generates a data memory barrier with the option ish
whereas I think that the one which has the "release" semantic is ishst
(store before store). The attached patch implements my proposal.
Thanks,
Yvan
--
gcc/
Jason Merrill writes:
> While I was going over the C++11 status page, I noticed that quick_exit is
> implemented by glibc, it just needed to be added to the libstdc++ cstdlib
> header.
The test fails on Solaris 9:
FAIL: 18_support/quick_exit/quick_exit.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
On 14/02/13 13:53, Greta Yorsh wrote:
This patch sets attribute "predicable" to "yes" for patterns that handle add
with carry and already use %? in their output statements.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Greta
gcc/
2013-02-14 Greta Yorsh
* config/arm/arm.md (addsi3_carryin_): Set attribute
Oops, I missed that the release semantics is not just store before
store but also load before store, sorry for that :(
Yvan
On 14 February 2013 16:40, Yvan Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a call to the builtin __atomic_thread_fence with the memory model
> __ATOMIC_RELEASE generates a data memory barrier w
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Konstantin Serebryany
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Konstantin Serebryany
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The attached patch is the libsanitizer merge from upstream r175042.
>>>
>>> Lots of changes. Among
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 08:33:27AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> 2013-02-14 H.J. Lu
>
> PR bootstrap/56327
> * interception/interception.h (OFF_T): Merged from upstream
> r175140.
Ok.
> diff --git a/libsanitizer/interception/interception.h
> b/libsanitizer/interception/interceptio
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Pat Haugen wrote:
> The following patch fixes the assignment of the insn "type" attribute for
> loads and stores. Specifically, it will now appropriately assign update form
> and update-indexed form type attributes which allows for better instruction
> scheduling b
Ping^2
Originally posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00554.html
Thanks,
Yufeng
On 01/28/13 15:04, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
Ping~
On 01/10/13 16:20, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
Hi,
This patch updates the top-level configuration files to explicitly set
libgloss_dir to aarch64 for
Hi Rainer,
On 02/14/2013 04:45 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Jason Merrill writes:
While I was going over the C++11 status page, I noticed that quick_exit is
implemented by glibc, it just needed to be added to the libstdc++ cstdlib
header.
The test fails on Solaris 9:
FAIL: 18_support/quick_exit/q
On 10/01/13 16:20, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
Hi,
This patch updates the top-level configuration files to explicitly set
libgloss_dir to aarch64 for aarch64*-*-* targets.
OK to commit?
Thanks,
Yufeng
2013-01-10 Yufeng Zhang
* configure.ac: Set libgloss_dir for the aarch64*-*-* targets.
Hi,
here's a patch that adds a testcase for PR 55987.
Is xfail the right thing to use here? I went with that since I guess the
PR won't be fixed anytime soon ;)
I haven't assigned copyright to the FSF -- is this patch small enough to
go in without it?
Thanks,
Tilman
2013-02-14 Tilman Sauerbeck
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Matt wrote:
> The attached patches do two things:
> 1. Backports a fix from trunk that eliminates bogus warning traces. On my
> current codebase which links ~40MB of C++ with LTO, the bogus warning traces
> are literally hundreds of lines.
>
What is the trunk rev
... or the below, just in case an interesting system provides the
*quick_exit functions but doesn't define _GLIBCXX_USE_C99.
Paolo.
///
Index: testsuite/18_support/quick_exit/quick_exit.cc
===
--- testsuite/18_s
On 2/14/13, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > Add class record_builder to ease construction of records and unions. Use
> > it
> > in some appropriate places.
> > tree
> > -default_emutls_var_fields (tree type, tree *name ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
>
On Feb 14, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Matt wrote:
>> The attached patches do two things:
>> 1. Backports a fix from trunk that eliminates bogus warning traces. On my
>> current codebase which links ~40MB of C++ with LTO, the bogus warning trac
We try to print typename types when dumping template bindings in order
to be helpful. But we can't do that for typenames in pack expansions
because we don't know which pack element we're interested in.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 91f6181cddda74ddfbae6e57454ab696598479
Ok for the google branch -- please provide the patch details in svn
commit message (note that ChangeLog is not needed any more for the
branch).
David
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Matt Hargett wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Ok for the google branch -- please provide the patch details in svn
commit message (note that ChangeLog is not needed any more for the
branch).
I don't have commit access (yet). Should I email overse...@gcc.gnu.org as
mentioned at http://gcc.gnu.o
> "Dave" == John David Anglin writes:
Dave> I had looked at this a bit in the past. I don't think it's that
Dave> difficult to add DWARF2 support
Dave> to GCC on hppa. Although we don't support named sections, we can
Dave> create named subspaces
Dave> for the dwarf info. More of an issue i
Andi Kleen writes:
PING^3
I'm about to give up on this, concluding that there is no interest
in improving the gcc documentation.
-Andi
> Andi Kleen writes:
>
> PING^2!!
>
>> Andi Kleen writes:
>>
>>> From: Andi Kleen
>>>
>>> The TSX HLE/RTM intrinsics were missing documentation. Add this to
Hi Tobias,
OK. Thanks for the patch after fixing the nit below.
Sorry for not noticing the review when you sent it.
Here is the patch as I committed it as Revision 196058.
2013-02-14 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/56224
* gfortran.h (gfc_add_include_path): Add boolean argument
PR55341 has two complaints, that powerpc gcc references a non-ABI
symbol exported by glibc, and that the scheme used to find the aux
vector can be broken by someone writing *environ = 0. Both true, but
since this code is only exercised when running Linux kernels prior to
2.6.15 (7 years old!), I w
In this PR, when we go to substitute into LAMBDA_EXPR_EXTRA_SCOPE, we
look for a local specialization of the parameter 'f', but there isn't
one because we aren't in a function body. For this case, unlike uses in
a trailing-return-type, we really need to look up the parameter in the
function pa
On 02/14/2013 10:02 AM, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> Hi,
> here's a patch that adds a testcase for PR 55987.
> Is xfail the right thing to use here? I went with that since I guess the
> PR won't be fixed anytime soon ;)
>
> I haven't assigned copyright to the FSF -- is this patch small enough to
> go
The standard says that using X::X always means inheriting constructors,
even if X is a typedef. In templates, we also need to support this
usage for template template parameters, not just type parameters.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 2b5203157486e00788228c2fe8572b5bbf4
This testcase is well-formed, even though it doesn't do what the user
was trying to accomplish. In Tuple the use of a pack
expansion not at the end of the list makes the whole argument list a
non-deduced context, so we should get out early before it confuses us.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ap
On 02/13/2013 06:39 AM, Greta Yorsh wrote:
> The tests gcc.target/arm/interrupt-*.c are for ARM mode only.
> This patch uses effective target arm_notthumb instead of __thumb_ predefine,
> removes unreachable code, and fixes typos.
>
> Ok for trunk?
>
OK
Janis
> Thanks,
> Greta
>
> ChangeLog
>
Hello,
A user sent me a request to give names to the digraph in a graph dump.
This name can be used as a key for the dump, for a tool that can
generate graph metrics to see GCC transforms code as it passes through
the pipeline. Another user requested the same thing for a hacked xdot
that can plot
> >> AFAICT, for gcc+gas it should already work with binutils that include
> >> the AdaCore patch for DWARF support. But this has apparently not been
> >> tested with AIX ld, and there are AdaCore local patches pending.
> >> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-04/msg00250.html
> >> http://www.so
Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Chao-Ying Fu writes:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Once in a while we got reports about programs (ex:
> WebKit, FireFox)
> > crash due to ldc1/sdc1 unaligned accesses on MIPS targets. The root
> > cause is that programmers neglect the alignment issue and cast
> > arbitrary
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> PR55341 has two complaints, that powerpc gcc references a non-ABI
> symbol exported by glibc, and that the scheme used to find the aux
> vector can be broken by someone writing *environ = 0. Both true, but
> since this code is only exercised wh
Normally we defer instantiation of the initializer of a static data
member of a template class until it is actually needed. If we need it
for deducing the type of the variable, we can go ahead and instantiate
it at that point.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit fe74d7110cba
When we're building up a CONSTRUCTOR to represent the initialization
done by a constexpr constructor, initialization of a member of an
anonymous union shows up as an assignment to a COMPONENT_REF of the main
class object. We need to turn this into a CONSTRUCTOR for the anonymous
union object i
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> What about 64-bit targets? We can sometimes access doubles using GPRs,
> so on 64-bit targets we could end up using LD and SD to access a double
> even when this option disables LDC1 and SDC1. I think we'd need to
> patch the move patterns as well.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki
wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> What about 64-bit targets? We can sometimes access doubles using GPRs,
>> so on 64-bit targets we could end up using LD and SD to access a double
>> even when this option disables LDC1 a
On 02/14/2013 02:16 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
... or the below, just in case an interesting system provides the
*quick_exit functions but doesn't define _GLIBCXX_USE_C99.
It seems rather unlikely that the system would provide some C11
functions without the corresponding C99 ones. I'm just goin
During subreg1, we fail to split
(insn 4 3 5 2 (set (reg:TI 63 [ x ])
(const_int 0 [0])) pr55941.c:2 85 {*movti_internal_rex64}
(nil))
which leads to all the rest of the problems described in the PR.
This happens because we read the mode from the CONST_INT, and
unsurprisingly VOID
In this testcase, we see a use of a constant variable in a lambda
(though the same thing can happen with a local class member function).
We try to pull out the constant value in finish_id_expression, but
because the initializer isn't a reduced constant yet, that fails and we
end up just returni
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:55:47PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
>> The patch seems to work on a simple test. Let me digest it.
>> I am trying to understand if there are problems with it other than the
>> added complexity (which is what
80 matches
Mail list logo
