On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 06:16:45PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> Since flag-types.h is used in target code, it needs to be -Wall-safe
> for targets with 16-bit "int". OK?
With a ChangeLog entry yes.
> --- gcc/flag-types.h (revision 216287)
> +++ gcc/flag-types.h (working copy)
> @@ -229,17 +22
Ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00704.html
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
Hello,
This patch extends expand_mul_widen_hilo to 512-bit QI,SI,HI modes.
Bootstrapped and regtested
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(ix86_expand_mul_widen_hilo): Handle V32HI, V16SI, V64QI modes.
Is it ok for trunk?
--
Thanks, K
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386
Hello,
This patch extends insertion hook.
AVX-512* tests on top of patch-set all pass
under simulator.
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c
(ix86_expand_vector_set): Handle V8DF, V8DI, V16SF, V16SI, V32HI, V64QI
modes.
--
Thanks, K
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/
On 2014.10.15 at 17:00 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > If you could implement the second option, it would be appreciated.
>
> Could you please test this for me? It builds as a powerpc-elf
> cross-compiler (at least the host half) but I don't have a power
> machine here to test on.
>
> Index: rs6
Hello,
the attached one-liner passed bootstrap+testsuite (really all languages)
on x86_64-linux-gnu (I got an extra pass of unix/-m32: os but I assume
that the failure with trunk was random).
The current code is a bit weird: we bail out if either result or found is
TREE_ADDRESSABLE, but then
> The other changes are OK.
Committed those then. Thanks!
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:02:25PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/16/14 00:03, Alan Modra wrote:
> >gcc testsuite additions? I decline. It is too soon. If you had read
> >my patch submission you'll see that at some stage gcc was supposed to
> >warn on conflicting section attributes, but hasn't d
Hi Sterling,
Since the patch is delayed for a long time, I'm kind of pushing it. Sorry
for that.
Yeah, you are right. We have some performance issue here as GCC may use one
more general register in some cases with this patch.
Take the following arraysum testcase for example. In dol
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Zoran Jovanovic
wrote:
> Hello,
> Updated doc/invoke.texi by stating that new option is enabled by default at
> -O2 and higher.
> Also, -fmerge-bitfields added to the list of optimization flags enabled by
> default at -O2 and higher.
With this patch applied g
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Lynn A. Boger
wrote:
>
> I'm working on a patch submission for gccgo to add the R_PPC64 relocation
> definitions to libgo/go/debug/elf/elf.go. Along with this submission I was
> going to update the testcase file_test.go from the same directory so it
> would test t
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > I don't see what the stor-layout.c changes have to do with that
> > description, or why they are correct (they look wrong to me; the
> > existing addition of BITS_PER_UNIT_LOG + 1 looks logically correct
> > for bitsizetype).
>
> sooo... the type for bit
> I don't see what the stor-layout.c changes have to do with that
> description, or why they are correct (they look wrong to me; the
> existing addition of BITS_PER_UNIT_LOG + 1 looks logically correct
> for bitsizetype).
sooo... the type for bitsizetype will *always* be a bigger type than
sizety
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Carrot Wei wrote:
> LGTM.
> Your description could be more detail, such as which tests on which target.
Committed with a much improved message as r216291
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, DJ Delorie wrote:
> A few more cases where pointers were assumed to be whole bytes.
> Ok?
I don't see what the stor-layout.c changes have to do with that
description, or why they are correct (they look wrong to me; the existing
addition of BITS_PER_UNIT_LOG + 1 looks logica
ok.
David
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> It's destroyed by gimple_value_profile_transformations.
>
> Patch updated to move the update_ssa early.
>
> Index: gcc/auto-profile.c
> ===
> --- gcc/auto-profile.c (rev
It's destroyed by gimple_value_profile_transformations.
Patch updated to move the update_ssa early.
Index: gcc/auto-profile.c
===
--- gcc/auto-profile.c (revision 216278)
+++ gcc/auto-profile.c (working copy)
@@ -1674,7 +1674,14 @@ a
A few more cases where pointers were assumed to be whole bytes.
Ok?
Index: gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c
===
--- gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c (revision 216287)
+++ gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c (working copy)
@@ -668,13 +668,13 @@ cpp_ato
Since flag-types.h is used in target code, it needs to be -Wall-safe
for targets with 16-bit "int". OK?
Index: gcc/flag-types.h
===
--- gcc/flag-types.h(revision 216287)
+++ gcc/flag-types.h(working copy)
@@ -229,17 +229,17
In the event that pointer sizes aren't powers of two, choose a more
suitable alignment than (unsigned)(-1), which results in HUGE file
sizes. Ok?
Index: gcc/lto/lto-object.c
===
--- gcc/lto/lto-object.c(revision 216287)
+++
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/15/14 15:46, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >
> > > We've got a complaint that the "dereferencing pointer to incomplete
> > > type" error is printed for all occurrences of the incomplete type,
> > > which is too
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 03:48:20PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/15/14 15:46, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> >On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >
> >>We've got a complaint that the "dereferencing pointer to incomplete
> >>type" error is printed for all occurrences of the incomplete type,
> >>w
On 10/15/14 15:46, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
We've got a complaint that the "dereferencing pointer to incomplete
type" error is printed for all occurrences of the incomplete type,
which is too verbose. Also it'd be nicer to print the type as well.
This pa
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
> We've got a complaint that the "dereferencing pointer to incomplete
> type" error is printed for all occurrences of the incomplete type,
> which is too verbose. Also it'd be nicer to print the type as well.
> This patch fixes this; if we find an incompl
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 14:51 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/15/14 12:25, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 11:36 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> >> On 10/13/14 11:45, David Malcolm wrote:
> >>> gcc/ChangeLog:
> >>> * configure.ac (gcc_version): Expose this value for use via
> >>> AC_SUBST,
Hi,
contributed by Daniel. Thanks!
Paolo.
/
2014-10-15 Daniel Krugler
* testsuite/20_util/common_type/requirements/sfinae_friendly_1.cc:
Enable tests predicated on PR c++/53000.
Index: testsuite/20_util/common_type/requirements/sfinae_friendly_1.cc
=
On 10/15/14 11:22, Marek Polacek wrote:
We've got a complaint that the "dereferencing pointer to incomplete
type" error is printed for all occurrences of the incomplete type,
which is too verbose. Also it'd be nicer to print the type as well.
This patch fixes this; if we find an incomplete type,
> If you could implement the second option, it would be appreciated.
Could you please test this for me? It builds as a powerpc-elf
cross-compiler (at least the host half) but I don't have a power
machine here to test on.
Index: rs6000-c.c
On 10/15/14 12:25, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 11:36 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/13/14 11:45, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
* configure.ac (gcc_version): Expose this value for use via
AC_SUBST, since the jit code needs it within the new file
libgccj
On 10/15/14 10:56, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 11:09 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 13:45 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
I'd like to merge the JIT branch into trunk:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/JIT
This is "v2" since it incorporates fixes for the various issues
i
Hi,
I'm working on a patch submission for gccgo to add the R_PPC64
relocation definitions to libgo/go/debug/elf/elf.go. Along with this
submission I was going to update the testcase file_test.go from the same
directory so it would test the new defines for ppc64 relocation. This
test current
On 15/10/14 22:06 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 15/10/2014 13:10, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I find this much easier to read:
#if __cplusplus < 201103L
typedef _Is_contiguous_sequence<_Sequence> __tag;
#else
using __lvalref = std::is_lvalue_reference<
typename std::iterator_traits
On 15/10/2014 13:10, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I find this much easier to read:
#if __cplusplus < 201103L
typedef _Is_contiguous_sequence<_Sequence> __tag;
#else
using __lvalref = std::is_lvalue_reference<
typename std::iterator_traits<_InputIterator>::reference>;
using __con
> Jan, any opinion on the following patch?
>
> > 2014-10-06 Eric Botcazou
> >
> > * ipa-inline-transform.c (can_remove_node_now_p_1): Return false for a
> > master clone that has non-inline clones.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00436.html
>
> Thanks in advance.
Y
On Oct 15, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> I just did some very rough sanity checking -- the details of the testsuite
> I'm totally leaving in your hands :-)
Likewise, I’m likely to leave it totally in your hands. If you have any
specific questions or concerns, asking would be the way to
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Felix Yang wrote:
> PING？
> Cheers,
> Felix
Felix,
This isn't my day job, 24-hour pings are unproductive.
You shouldn't need to worry about the trip count register getting
spilled. It makes no difference whatsoever to how the loop
operates--the trip count is dea
As long as you commit to gcc first, or at the same time as other
commits, you'll be fine. If you commit elsewhere first or only, it
may be reverted by a script.
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 11:33 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/13/14 11:45, David Malcolm wrote:
> > The jit needs to create a temporary directory, so I need to expose
> > libiberty's choose_tmpdir as a public entrypoint.
> >
> > include/ChangeLog:
> > * libiberty.h (choose_tmpdir): New prototype.
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, David Malcolm wrote:
> As for the "bindir" in site.exp, Joseph asked me when the library
> invokes a driver to convert from .s to .so to:
>
> On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 23:27 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > * use the $(target_noncanonical)-gcc-$(version) name for the
> > driver
On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 11:36 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/13/14 11:45, David Malcolm wrote:
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > * configure.ac (gcc_version): Expose this value for use via
> > AC_SUBST, since the jit code needs it within the new file
> > libgccjit.pc.in.
> > (doc_build_sys): New
Hi,
On 10/15/2014 11:44 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We might also want to consider a global s/gnu++0x/gnu++11/ some day.
The below takes care of 17-19, the rest over the next days...
Paolo.
//
2014-10-15 Paolo Carlini
* testsuite/17_intro/freestanding.cc: Prefer -st
Hello!
Now that %ebx is no more fixed, we can remove all PIC related
complications in atomic_compare_and_swap_doubleword pattern. The
immediate consequence is, that we avoid "hidden" xchgs that clobbered
unwinding state.
Earlier fix by Ian [1] partly solved this issue using various .cfi
directive
Jan, any opinion on the following patch?
> 2014-10-06 Eric Botcazou
>
> * ipa-inline-transform.c (can_remove_node_now_p_1): Return false for a
> master clone that has non-inline clones.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00436.html
Thanks in advance.
--
Eric Botcazou
Committed to trunk.
Author: iverbin
Date: Wed Oct 15 17:49:27 2014
New Revision: 216280
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216280&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/63536
gcc/java/
* lang.c (java_print_error_function): Add check on NULL function
context.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/java/ChangeLog
2014-10-14 1:11 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 10/08/14 12:50, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch starts a series which is a result of split of Pointer Bounds
>> Checker patch #14 (Pointer Bounds Checker passes).
>>
>> This patch introduces compiler flags used by checker and helper function
On 10/14/14 09:30, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 11:09 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 13:45 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
I'd like to merge the JIT branch into trunk:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/JIT
This is "v2" since it incorporates fixes for the various issues
i
On 10/15/14 10:59, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 11:09 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 13:45 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
I'd like to merge the JIT branch into trunk:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/JIT
This is "v2" since it incorporates fixes for the various issues
i
Is it destroyed by value profile transformations? Can you move the
dominance recomputing code closer to where it gets invalidated?
David
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> This patch recalculates dominance info before update_ssa call in
> AutoFDO. This fixes bug when dominance
On 10/14/14 09:18, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 11:09 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 13:45 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
I'd like to merge the JIT branch into trunk:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/JIT
This is "v2" since it incorporates fixes for the various issues
i
On 10/15/2014 07:35 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 15, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
... the below replaces -std=c++0x and -std=c++11 with -std=gnu++11.
Seems odd to go from c++11 -> gnu++11. Why?
Because all the new testcases we are committing use -std=gnu++11, which
is right, becau
On Oct 15, 2014, at 2:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 15/10/14 10:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> We might also want to consider a global s/gnu++0x/gnu++11/ some day.
>
> One reason for doing that replacement is that I keep copying existing
> tests and then having to change it, and I'm laz
On 10/14/14 09:10, David Malcolm wrote:
ChangeLog:
* MAINTAINERS (Various Maintainers): Add myself as jit maintainer.
contrib/ChangeLog:
* jit-coverage-report.py: New file: a script to print crude
code-coverage information for the libgccjit API.
gcc/ChangeLog:
*
We were never calling coerce_template_parms for arguments to a variable
template, which meant we weren't packing arguments into an argument
pack, so tsubst_pack_expansion gave up.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 7e029731a4b77a1c54982e9922ff09219c46cc4b
Author: Jason Merril
This patch recalculates dominance info before update_ssa call in
AutoFDO. This fixes bug when dominance info is out-of-date and causes
segfaults during update_ssa.
Bootstrapped and regression test on-going.
OK for google-4_9 branch?
Thanks,
Dehao
Index: gcc/auto-profile.c
==
On 10/13/14 11:45, David Malcolm wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
* configure.ac (gcc_version): Expose this value for use via
AC_SUBST, since the jit code needs it within the new file
libgccjit.pc.in.
(doc_build_sys): New variable, set to "sphinx" if
sphinx is install
On Oct 15, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> ... the below replaces -std=c++0x and -std=c++11 with -std=gnu++11.
Seems odd to go from c++11 -> gnu++11. Why?
On Oct 15, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 11:50 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>> We might also want to consider a global s/gnu++0x/gnu++11/ some day.
>> And s/gnu++1y/gnu++14 of course ;)
> I'm going to commit the below.
Yes please, thanks.
On 10/13/14 11:45, David Malcolm wrote:
The jit needs to create a temporary directory, so I need to expose
libiberty's choose_tmpdir as a public entrypoint.
include/ChangeLog:
* libiberty.h (choose_tmpdir): New prototype.
libiberty/ChangeLog:
* choose-temp.c (choose_tmpdir): Rem
On 10/13/14 16:35, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
OK? When the second patch is approved?
Ping?
Nevermind my comments, both were approved in the last day or two.
jeff
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/13/14 16:35, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>>
>>> OK? When the second patch is approved?
>>
>>
>> Ping?
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andrew Pinski
>>>
>>> ChangeLog:
>>> Revert:
>>>
On 10/13/14 16:35, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
OK? When the second patch is approved?
Ping?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
ChangeLog:
Revert:
2011-08-19 H.J. Lu
PR middle-end/49721
* explow.c (convert_memory_addr
We've got a complaint that the "dereferencing pointer to incomplete
type" error is printed for all occurrences of the incomplete type,
which is too verbose. Also it'd be nicer to print the type as well.
This patch fixes this; if we find an incomplete type, mark it with error
node, then we don't pr
On Oct 15, 2014, at 6:36 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> + wide_int max_wi = wi::max_value (TYPE_PRECISION (type), UNSIGNED);
> + max_val = wi::to_widest (wide_int_to_tree (type, max_wi));
>
> ick - there must be a better way to "extend" max_wi to "infinite"
> precision. Mike?
widest_in
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:28:45PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 2014-10-14 4:17 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> >On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 11:02 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> >>Here is a new rematerialization sub-pass of LRA.
> >
> >When Mike and I build with this patch along with the patch that
>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> To re-iterate here (as I expect most people will only look
> at [0/n] patches ;)), the question is whether we are fine
> with making fold-const (thus fold_{unary,binary,ternary})
> not handle some cases it handles currently.
I'd say
On 10/14/2014 06:04 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/cgraph.h b/gcc/cgraph.h
index fb41b01..2de98b4 100644
--- a/gcc/cgraph.h
+++ b/gcc/cgraph.h
@@ -172,6 +172,12 @@ public:
/* Dump referring in list to FILE. */
void dump_referring (FILE *);
+ /* Get number of references for thi
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 11:09 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 13:45 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > I'd like to merge the JIT branch into trunk:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/JIT
> >
> > This is "v2" since it incorporates fixes for the various issues
> > identified by Joseph in
Hi,
this is mainline version of the fix for thunk creation I comitted to gcc-4.9
branch week ago.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted.
Honza
PR lto/62026
* lto/pr62026.C: New testcase.
* cgraphclones.c (duplicate_thunk_for_node): Get body to have args
t
> My preference would be to add the | SECTION_EXCLUDE unconditionally, and
> instead guard the
> if (flags & SECTION_EXCLUDE)
> *f++ = 'e';
> in varasm.c (default_elf_asm_named_section). The only other user of
> SECTION_EXCLUDE seems to be -gsplit-dwarf right now, Cary, is such a change
> ok
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 11:09 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 13:45 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > I'd like to merge the JIT branch into trunk:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/JIT
> >
> > This is "v2" since it incorporates fixes for the various issues
> > identified by Joseph in
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 05:57:22PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 05:54 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> > The patch fixes java i686 bootstrap for -mtune=intel/slm.
> >
> > Recent changes triggered java to write a note on compilation for a
> > function without context.
> >
> > make che
On 15/10/14 17:34, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 23/09/14 16:22, Stubbs, Andrew wrote:
Maybe the original patch is better? Or maybe it should reconfigure the
FPU instead of erroring out? But reconfigure it to what?
Andrew,
are you still working on this?
a bunch of tests on my local environment
On 10/15/2014 05:54 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> The patch fixes java i686 bootstrap for -mtune=intel/slm.
>
> Recent changes triggered java to write a note on compilation for a
> function without context.
>
> make check in progress
>
> Is it ok?
I guess so, but I don't understand how any fu
Hi,
The patch fixes java i686 bootstrap for -mtune=intel/slm.
Recent changes triggered java to write a note on compilation for a
function without context.
make check in progress
Is it ok?
ChangeLog:
2014-10-15 Evgeny Stupachenko
PR target/63536
* java/lang.c (java_print_er
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 08:17:39PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> +static unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT asan_shadow_offset_value;
> +static bool asan_shadow_offset_computed;
> +
> +/* Sets shadow offset to value in string VAL. */
> +
> +bool
> +set_asan_shadow_offset (const char *val)
> +{
> + char *endp;
On 23/09/14 16:22, Stubbs, Andrew wrote:
Maybe the original patch is better? Or maybe it should reconfigure the FPU
instead of erroring out? But reconfigure it to what?
Andrew,
are you still working on this?
a bunch of tests on my local environment failed because of the reason James m
On 2014-10-14 12:01 PM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On SPECINT2k performance is ~0.5% worse (5.5% regression on perlbmk), and
SPECFP is ~0.2% faster.
Thanks for reporting this. It is important for me as I have no aarch64
machine for benchmarking.
Perlbmk performance degradat
On 15/10/14 14:00, Richard Biener wrote:
Any comments and reviews welcome (I don't think that
my maintainership covers enough to simply check this in
without approval).
Hi Richard,
The match-and-simplify branch bootstrapped successfully on
aarch64-none-linux-gnu FWIW.
Thanks,
Kyrill
Hello.
Following patch introduces a new class called callgraph_annotation. Idea behind
the patch is to provide a generic interface one can use to register custom info
related to a cgraph_node. As you know, symbol_table provides hooks for
creation, deletion and duplication of a cgraph_node. If
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 04:13:25PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> @@ -39791,6 +39791,8 @@ ix86_expand_vector_init_duplicate (bool mmx_ok, enum
> machine_mode mode,
> case V8SFmode:
> case V8SImode:
> case V2DFmode:
> +
Hi!
This patch adds OpenACC support to C++ in the gomp4 branch.
OK to apply?
Thanks!
Jim
ChangeLog entries...
= gcc/ChangeLog.gomp
2014-10-15 James Norris
* builtin-types.def (BT_FN_VOID_INT_PTR_INT): New type.
* oacc-builtins.def (BUILT_IN_GOACC_WAIT): New built
Back in March I posted an 89-patch kit to expand and make use of the
gimple statement class hierarchy to move much of the type-checking of
statement accessors to be at compile-time rather than run-time:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01148.html
I'd like to get these patches into
On 10/06/2014 03:17 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 10/06/2014 03:06 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 09/29/2014 09:21 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
Hi all,
Kasan developers has asked for an option to override offset of Asan
shadow memory region. This should simplify experimenting with memory
layouts on 64-bit a
On 10/15/14 09:54, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
I looked into sdbout.c code and didn't find any places requiring
fixes. It seems it just ignores cases when it doesn't know what to
output.
Perfect. I really don't want to invest developer time into
significantly improving sdbout or dbxout. If sdbout i
On 10/15/14 08:35, Marc Glisse wrote:
Would that extra pass be acceptable?
Otherwise, what do you think should be responsible for cleaning up the
dead assignments?
Does anyone have an opinion on which side needs to be improved? As a
reminder:
- we have a va_list with its address taken by va_
2014-06-18 0:56 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 06/11/14 02:50, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch skips all bounds during debug info generation.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ilya
>> --
>> gcc/
>>
>> 2014-06-11 Ilya Enkovich
>>
>> * dbxout.c (dbx
The following patch solves PR63448. The problem is described on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63448
The patch is safe and was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev. 216270 to the trunk and as rev. 216271 to gcc-4.9
branch.
2014-10-15 Vladimir Makarov
Hi!
No matter whether it's C, C++, or Fortran source code, the libgomp
testsuite always uses (for build-tree testing) gcc/xgcc, or (for
installed testing) GCC_UNDER_TEST. It doesn't make use of
GXX_UNDER_TEST, GFORTRAN_UNDER_TEST. To support the latter two
languages' needs, some -l[...] flags ar
On 10/14/14 23:09, Teresa Johnson wrote:
The below patch fixes the overflow detection when recomputing
probabilities after jump threading, in case of incoming profile
insanities. It detects more cases where the computation will overflow
not only the max probability but the max int and possibly wr
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:28:37PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On 15 Oct 17:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > This patch adds all examples with '#pragma omp target' from [1] to libgomp
> > > testsuite. Without an accelerator or emulator, these tests are
> > > UNSUPPORTED.
> >
> > Why? Most of the
On 15 Oct 17:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > This patch adds all examples with '#pragma omp target' from [1] to libgomp
> > testsuite. Without an accelerator or emulator, these tests are UNSUPPORTED.
>
> Why? Most of the tests should work just fine with host fallback.
> Yeah, from Examples 4.0.1 I'
Hello,
ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02625.html
a patch proposal to fix exception propagation on spe powerpc targets.
The idea is to improve expand_builtin_init_dwarf_reg_sizes to account
for register spans as other functions in dwarf2cfi.c do, by extracting
the processi
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 06:57:52PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch adds all examples with '#pragma omp target' from [1] to libgomp
> testsuite. Without an accelerator or emulator, these tests are UNSUPPORTED.
Why? Most of the tests should work just fine with host fallback.
Yea
Hello,
This patch adds all examples with '#pragma omp target' from [1] to libgomp
testsuite. Without an accelerator or emulator, these tests are UNSUPPORTED.
Bootstrapped and regtested on i686-linux and x86_64-linux. Is it OK for trunk?
[1] http://openmp.org/mp-documents/OpenMP_Examples_4.0.1.p
On 15/10/14 14:44, Renlin Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch is part of a series of patches that implement ACLE 2.0
> predefined macros support for AArch64.
>
> aarch64-none-elf target has been tested on the model, no regression.
>
> Is it Okay to commit?
>
> Kind regards!
> Renlin Li
>
> gcc
On 15/10/14 14:39, Renlin Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch is part of a series of patches that implement ACLE 2.0
> predefined macros support for AArch64.
>
> aarch64-none-elf target has been tested on the model, no regression.
>
> Is it Okay to commit?
>
> Kind regards!
> Renlin Li
>
> gcc
Hi all,
The attached patch fixes PR lto/61048.
The basic idea is to write option -fsanitize to existing ELF section
.gnu.lto_.opts in object files and then read it in lto-wrapper.
On 15.10.2014 12:46, Richard Biener wrote:
You need to handle them in lto-opts.c and output them to the existing
On 15/10/14 14:35, Renlin Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch is part of a series of patches that implement ACLE 2.0
> predefined macro support for AArch64.
>
> aarch64-none-elf target has been tested on the model, no regression.
>
> Is it Okay to commit?
>
> Kind regards!
> Renlin Li
>
> gcc/
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 06:18:56PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On 14 Oct 11:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > My preference would be to add the | SECTION_EXCLUDE unconditionally, and
> > instead guard the
> > if (flags & SECTION_EXCLUDE)
> > *f++ = 'e';
> > in varasm.c (default_elf_asm_named_secti
On 9 October 2014 16:03, Tejas Belagod wrote:
>>
>> +(define_insn "vec_load_lanesoi_lane"
>
>
> Best to prepend "aarch64_" the pattern name, IMHO, else it looks like a
> standard pattern name(eg. vec_load_lanes) at first glance.
>
> Otherwise, LGTM(but I can't approve it). Thanks for this patch.
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
