On Jan 14, 2015, at 3:50 AM, Tejas Belagod tejas.bela...@arm.com wrote:
As agreed here (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971), please
can I reverse Andrew's patch
out(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02916.html)?
Ok.
Unless someone objects to a reversion like
On 15/01/15 03:51, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/14/15 15:31, Jiong Wang wrote:
agree, and I think the truncation is needed otherwise there may have ICE
on some target.
and I found current gcc LOCATION info is very good !
have done an experimental hack on at expand_assignment: 4931 where the
tree is
On Jan 15, 2015, at 7:28 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
The attached patch fixes it by ensuring that LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS is computed
after set_ld_library_path_env_vars is invoked (this procedure invokes in turn
set_gcc_exec_prefix_env_var), both in c-torture.exp and in
On Jan 15, 2015, at 8:14 AM, Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that gcc-dg.exp calls check_effective_target_lto, which calls
libatomic_target_compile. Therefore gcc-dg.exp should be loaded only after
the
definition of libatomic_target_compile.
However, a similar exp file
On 15 January 2015 at 14:14, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Steve Ellcey sell...@imgtec.com wrote:
I tried compiling an empty plugin that just included gcc-plugin.h and
plugin-version.h and found that these header files were included from
So, I wanted to add some unrolling test cases and found that we had unroll-1.c
and unroll_[1-5].c. :-( - is the standard, and picking numbers sequential
from 1, with a - before the number is standard. No reason to deviate in this
case. I’ve fixed this by renaming the test cases like so:
On 01/15/15 09:27, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 15/01/15 03:51, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/14/15 15:31, Jiong Wang wrote:
agree, and I think the truncation is needed otherwise there may have ICE
on some target.
and I found current gcc LOCATION info is very good !
have done an experimental hack on at
On 11/20/14 05:33, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Now that I've managed to put together and test all the submitted OpenACC
patches I found there was one piece missing. The problem is that omp-low
on the host likes to generate function names like _main._omp_fn. On
ptx, the dot is not allowed in
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
Upstream libffi has added support for Go closures (using the static chain),
and support for complex numbers. Perhaps less relevant is new support for
arc, microblaze,
On 01/15/15 03:13, Robert Suchanek wrote:
Robert, can you look at reload.c::reload_inner_reg_of_subreg and verify
that the comment just before its return statement is effectively the
situation you're in.
There are certainly cases where a SUBREG needs to be treated as an
in-out operand. We
On 12/15/2014 12:41 AM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
+(define_expand cmpmode
+ [(set (match_operand 0 cc_register )
+(match_operator:CC 1 aarch64_comparison_operator
+ [(match_operand:GPI 2 register_operand )
+ (match_operand:GPI 3 aarch64_plus_operand )]))]
+
+
+
Hello.
This is Honsa's patch that I've just tested on x86_64-linux-pc. The patch is
preapproved by Honza
and is going to be installed.
Thanks,
Martin
From 84b6878f168802516febfbd00252f56f965b9666 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mliska mli...@suse.cz
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:20:00 +0100
On 01/15/2015 08:54 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
Upstream libffi has added support for Go closures (using the static chain),
and support for complex numbers. Perhaps less
On 15 Jan 09:40, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jan 15, 2015, at 8:14 AM, Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that gcc-dg.exp calls check_effective_target_lto, which calls
libatomic_target_compile. Therefore gcc-dg.exp should be loaded only after
the
definition of
On 01/15/15 01:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The glibc barriers are supposedly something that can be CSEd (one barrier
instead of
two consecutive barriers is enough), but certainly not moved across any
loads/stores
in between. In the kernel case, the enable/disable probably wouldn't allow
even
On 22 Dec 13:35, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:48:08PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
In my understanding, we'd like to support the modes that either all
compilers are installed (which is what a user will be using), or all are
tested from their build trees. Or, do we also
On 01/15/15 05:23, H.J. Lu wrote:
Hi,
libitm.c/stackundo.c fails with -fpic since test1 and test2 may be
preempted with -fpic. This patch makes those 2 functions static.
Tested on Linux/x86. OK for trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
diff --git a/libitm/ChangeLog b/libitm/ChangeLog
index
2015-01-15 14:22 GMT+01:00 Mikael Morin mikael.mo...@sfr.fr:
the attached patch fixes an ICE-on-invalid problem with
procedure-pointer components by making sure that we continue resolving
all components of a derived type, even after an error is thrown.
Does the fonction return false as
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:55:40PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
This patch enables 'make check-target-libgomp' with noninstalled offloading
compilers. It creates gcc/accel/target/ directory in the build tree of the
offloading compiler, this allows lto-wrapper to find corresponding mkoffload
in
On 01/15/15 04:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
With the addition of build libcpp, my build failed because of distro default
flags of -Werror=format-security.
The first hunk is I think no big deal, making it const makes the warning
go away.
The second hunk is more controversial, as even making
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:58:43PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
[ 5286s] ../../../libgo/go/reflect/makefuncgo_s390x.go:323:5: error: expected
';
' or '}' or newline
[ 5286s]} else {
[ 5286s] ^
Bet that
} else {
line should have been replaced with
default:
Jakub
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/15/2015 08:54 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
Upstream libffi has added support for Go closures
On 01/15/15 09:20, Rainer Orth wrote:
Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz writes:
On 01/07/2015 12:38 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Following patch adds support for target and optimization nodes
comparison, which is
based on Honza's newly added infrastructure.
Apart from that, there's a small hunk
On 01/05/15 21:01, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Radovan Obradovic wrote:
index eb37bfe..ddaf8e0 100644
--- a/gcc/toplev.c
+++ b/gcc/toplev.c
@@ -1605,6 +1612,11 @@ process_options (void)
/* Save the current optimization options. */
optimization_default_node =
Similar to the unroll_1.c change.
* gcc.dg/inline_1.c: Rename gcc.dg/inline_[1-4].c to inline-3[6-9].c.
* gcc.dg/inline_2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/inline_3.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/inline_4.c: Likewise.
The recent xgene tuning parameters merge broke the ARM bootstrap, since
the tables have been extended by an additional parameter giving:
gcc/config/arm/arm.c:1932:1: error: missing initializer for member
'tune_params::fuseable_ops' [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
};
^
Fixed as below.
OK, sorry for the delay.
Jason
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:30 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
So, I was hoping that someone would step forward and review this. I’d like
for a reviewer to consider, is this the type of error messages we want to
On 01/15/2015 08:40 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
The patch introduced massive problems on Solaris, both SPARC and x86:
* on Solaris/SPARC, /bin/as requires
.type fn,#function
instead of @function. I've simply commented the affected lines in
src/sparc/v[89].S to make progress.
*
Oops, got a bit excessive with the copy/paste.
commit 4203eda52ae9eefc618d3819a3c468841bf2910b
Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jan 14 23:58:50 2015 -0500
PR c++/64356
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_binary_expression): Fix pasto.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
2015-01-14 Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com
* Makefile.in (PLUGIN_HEADERS): Add dominance.h, cfg.h, cfgrtl.h,
cfganal.h, cfgbuild.h, cfgcleanup.h, lcm.h, builtins.def,
chkp-builtins.def, and pass-instances.def
Should pass-instances.def be removed from
Hi all,
This test is applicable to aarch64 target. This patch will remove
aarch64 from skip target list.
Verified that it passes for aarch64-none-elf and aarch64-none-linux-gnu
target.
Okay for trunk?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-01-15 Renlin Li renlin...@arm.com
*
Hello.
Following patch is a backport of PR lto/63704 for GCC 4.8 and 4.9 branches.
Richi preapproved me the patch and I've run regtests on x86_64-linux-pc.
I'm going to install the patch.
Thanks,
Martin
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 779fef7..ab916b8 100644
---
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
This fixes 141 FAILs.
-mpowerpc64 does not change the ABI, but default_scalar_mode_supported_p
does not know that, and allows TImode for -m32 -mpowerpc64.
This fixes it. Okay for mainline?
2015-01-14
So, I was hoping that someone would step forward and review this. I’d like for
a reviewer to consider, is this the type of error messages we want to vend to
the poor user? It strikes me as, well, icky. Should -fPIE imply -fPIC?
Exclusive of that issue, the patch is fine.
On Jan 11, 2015, at
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
So, I was hoping that someone would step forward and review this. I’d like
for a reviewer to consider, is this the type of error messages we want to
vend to the poor user? It strikes me as, well, icky. Should -fPIE
Ian Lance Taylor i...@golang.org writes:
I've committed a patch to libgo to update it to the Go 1.4 release,
except for the runtime package. Much of the runtime package was
rewritten in Go, and it does not really affect users of the library,
so I've postponed that complex merge. All the
Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz writes:
On 01/07/2015 12:38 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Following patch adds support for target and optimization nodes
comparison, which is
based on Honza's newly added infrastructure.
Apart from that, there's a small hunk that corrects formatting and
Hi,
if you run a test for a bareboard port, e.g. arm-eabi or visium-elf, you'll
see in gcc.log:
Running /home/eric/svn/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/dg.exp ...
Executing on host: /home/eric/build/gcc/arm-eabi/gcc/xgcc -
B/home/eric/build/gcc/arm-eabi/gcc/ linker_plugin14260.c -fno-diagnostics-
Hi!
This patch fixes 'make check-target-libatomic'.
The problem is that gcc-dg.exp calls check_effective_target_lto, which calls
libatomic_target_compile. Therefore gcc-dg.exp should be loaded only after the
definition of libatomic_target_compile.
However, a similar exp file in other tree
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
Upstream libffi has added support for Go closures (using the static chain),
and support for complex numbers. Perhaps less relevant is new support for
arc, microblaze, moxie, nios, and or1k targets.
Without additional changes for Go, this merge has
On 15/12/14 08:41, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 3:26 AM
To: Zhenqiang Chen
Cc: Marcus Shawcroft; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, AARCH64] Fix ICE in CCMP (PR64015)
-
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 13:36 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/14/15 13:32, David Edelsohn wrote:
The PPC64LE ABI specifies POWER8 ISA as the minimum hardware
requierment. Currently, Linux distributions are building the
toolchain using --with-cpu=power7 or power8, as they wish. GCC
defaults
On 14/01/15 02:20 PM, Robert Suchanek wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
An issue has been identified with LRA when running CPU2006 h264ref benchmark.
I'll try to describe what the issue is and a fix applied as it is very
difficult to reproduce it and it is next to impossible to create a narrowed
testcase
On 01/15/2015 05:20 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz writes:
On 01/07/2015 12:38 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Following patch adds support for target and optimization nodes
comparison, which is
based on Honza's newly added infrastructure.
Apart from that, there's a small
On 01/15/15 09:36, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
On 01/13/15 11:01, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
Is it really sufficient here to verify that all the defs are on latch
predecessors, what about the case where there is a predecessor
without a def. How do you guarantee domination in that case?
ISTM that given
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Patrick Wollgast
patrick.wollg...@rub.de wrote:
Is there something I'm still supposed to do, since I don't have write
access and this was the last part missing an OK?
Somebody with write access will need to commit the patch for you. You
should send a new clean
On 01/13/15 11:01, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
Is it really sufficient here to verify that all the defs are on latch
predecessors, what about the case where there is a predecessor
without a def. How do you guarantee domination in that case?
ISTM that given the structure for the code
On Jan 14, 2015, at 6:52 AM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 14/01/15 11:57, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Ping?
I'm OK with this, but I think you also need a generic testsuite
maintainer to go over the target independent parts.
Ok.
Richard,
Thanks for catching this.
Your change is optimal for X-Gene 1.
—Phil.
On 15 Jan 2015, at 19:51, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
The recent xgene tuning parameters merge broke the ARM bootstrap, since
the tables have been extended by an additional parameter giving:
Release managers: given that this only touches the jit, and that the jit
is off by default, any objections if I go ahead and commit this?
It's a late-breaking feature, but the jit as a whole is new, and
I think the following is a big win, so I'd like to proceed with this in
stage 3 (i.e. in the
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
This (and perhaps the previous gotools) patch broke Solaris bootstrap:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgo/go/net/tcpsockopt_unix.go:23:73: error:
reference to undefined identifier 'syscall.TCP_KEEPINTVL'
if
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
--- libcpp/expr.c.jj 2015-01-14 11:01:34.0 +0100
+++ libcpp/expr.c 2015-01-14 14:35:52.851002344 +0100
@@ -672,16 +672,17 @@ cpp_classify_number (cpp_reader *pfile,
if ((result CPP_N_WIDTH) == CPP_N_LARGE
CPP_OPTION
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:58:43PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
[ 5286s] ../../../libgo/go/reflect/makefuncgo_s390x.go:323:5: error:
expected ';
' or '}' or newline
[ 5286s]} else {
[ 5286s] ^
Bet that
} else
Applied, thanks.
Jason
On Jan 15, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 Jan 11:20, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jan 15, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com wrote:
If I just remove 'load_gcc_lib gcc-dg.exp' from libatomic.exp, like this is
done
in libitm.exp, it will not work:
Ok,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
Stage3 is closing rapidly. I've drained my queue of patches I was tracking
for gcc-5.However, note that I don't track everything. If it's a patch
for a backend, language other than C or seemingly has another maintainer
On 16 January 2015 at 00:00, Steve Ellcey sell...@imgtec.com wrote:
2015-01-14 Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com
* Makefile.in (PLUGIN_HEADERS): Add dominance.h, cfg.h, cfgrtl.h,
cfganal.h, cfgbuild.h, cfgcleanup.h, lcm.h, builtins.def,
chkp-builtins.def, and
r219655 added two files explow.h, dojump.h with duplicated contents,
silly mistake from my side. The attached patch removes duplicate
contents. Committed (r219680) as obvious.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2015-01-15 Prathamesh Kulkarni prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org
* explow.h: Remove duplicate
On 15 Jan 11:20, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jan 15, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com wrote:
If I just remove 'load_gcc_lib gcc-dg.exp' from libatomic.exp, like this is
done
in libitm.exp, it will not work:
Ok, original patch is fine.
Oh, I see, it's loaded by
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 03:05:59PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
Release managers: given that this only touches the jit, and that the jit
is off by default, any objections if I go ahead and commit this?
It's a late-breaking feature, but the jit as a whole is new, and
I think the following is a
gcc_jit_block_add_assignment_op was missing type-checking on the params,
which could lead to an ICE deep inside gimplification in fold-const.c:
10339 gcc_assert (TYPE_PRECISION (atype) == TYPE_PRECISION (type));
Takes jit.sum's # of expected passes from 7494 to 7514.
Committed to trunk as
On 01/15/15 13:20, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
In r219682, I have committed to trunk our current set of OpenACC changes,
which we had prepared on gomp-4_0-branch. Thanks to everyone who has
been contributing!
Note that this is an experimental feature, incomplete, and subject to
change in
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Apart from that, bootstrap fails in gotools: due to the use of
-static-libgo, all commands there fail to link since the socket
functions are missing. It seems like $LIBS from libgo needs to be added
somewhere,
On Jan 15, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com wrote:
If I just remove 'load_gcc_lib gcc-dg.exp' from libatomic.exp, like this is
done
in libitm.exp, it will not work:
Ok, original patch is fine.
On January 15, 2015 9:05:59 PM CET, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
Release managers: given that this only touches the jit, and that the
jit
is off by default, any objections if I go ahead and commit this?
It's a late-breaking feature, but the jit as a whole is new, and
I think the
On 15.01.2015 17:01, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Patrick Wollgast
patrick.wollg...@rub.de wrote:
Is there something I'm still supposed to do, since I don't have write
access and this was the last part missing an OK?
Somebody with write access will need to
Hi Thomas,
thanks to you and all others involved for the OpenACC merge.
Attached is a patch which converts for Fortran '%s' into %qs, as
mentioned to before. (It wasn't possible when the original patch was
reviewed as the common diagnostic patches came later.)
Committed as Rev. 219694.
Hi,
can_remove_node_now_p assumes that the node in question has no direct calls,
this
however is not checked in inline_call that leads to alias to be removed from
comdat group while it should not.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted.
Honza
PR ipa/64612
*
On 01/15/15 15:34, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
Stage3 is closing rapidly. I've drained my queue of patches I was tracking
for gcc-5.However, note that I don't track everything. If it's a patch
for a backend, language other than
On 14.01.15 10:43, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 13/01/15 21:08, Andreas Tobler wrote:
On 13.01.15 11:25, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Andreas Tobler andreast-l...@fgznet.ch wrote:
On 08.01.15 17:27, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/12/14 18:44, Andreas Tobler
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
Upstream libffi has added support for Go closures (using the static chain),
and support for complex numbers. Perhaps less relevant is new support for
arc, microblaze,
On 01/15/2015 02:47 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
Upstream libffi has added support for Go closures (using the static chain),
and support for complex numbers. Perhaps less
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds support to the GCC tree for building tools that are
used with Go. There are two external used tools (go, gofmt) and one
tool used internally by go (cgo). This patch is pure machinery, with
no source code.
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 05:06:35PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
Patch too large to attach uncompressed, this
has been created with update-copyright.py --this-year.
Note, I had to temporarily move away
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
Stage3 is closing rapidly. I've drained my queue of patches I was tracking
for gcc-5.However, note that I don't track everything. If it's a patch
for a backend, language other than C or seemingly has another maintainer
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/15/2015 02:47 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
Upstream libffi has added support for Go closures
Hi Jeff,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/15/15 15:34, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
Stage3 is closing rapidly. I've drained my queue of patches I was
tracking
for gcc-5.However, note
All of this has been posted before.
I believe the ABI change is something we should have for gcc 5.
Yes, the libffi merge has been causing problems (on targets that
don't even support libgo, annoyingly), but missing support for
the new libffi interfaces is easier to remedy in a dot release
than
Hi, all,
I just happened to notice that there are some incorrect date
in ChangeLog files. I guess this can be considered as obvious fix.
Committed it as Rev.219704: https://gcc.gnu.org/r219704
Index: gcc/ChangeLog
===
---
2015-01-14 17:56 GMT+08:00 Chung-Ju Wu jasonw...@gmail.com:
Hi, all,
In this patch of nds32 port:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00799.html
Since we have a new option -mcmodel= as substitution for -mgp-direct,
we need to update documentation about such change accordingly.
2015-01-14 17:58 GMT+08:00 Chung-Ju Wu jasonw...@gmail.com:
Hi, all,
In this patch of nds32 port:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00969.html
Since we remove the implementation of -mforce-fp-as-gp, -mforbid-fp-as-gp,
and -mex9 options, we need to update documentation as well.
I merged trunk revision 219701 to the gccgo branch.
Ian
This was really just a formality given Eric's existing maintainer
positions ;-)
I'm pleased to announce that Eric Botcazou has been appointed as the
maintainer for the Visium port.
Jeff
On 01/15/15 16:43, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Jakub, myself and management have discussed this issue extensively and those
patches specifically. I'm painfully aware of how this affects the ability
to utilize numerical packages in Python.
Thanks for the response! I had no idea anyone was paying
Hi jeff and Richard
On 15 January 2015 at 03:10, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/14/15 04:27, Venkataramanan Kumar wrote:
Hi all,
When trying to debug GCC combiner pass with the test case in PR63949
ref https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63949 I came across this
code.
Hi,
I think I should ping for this patch now:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00599.html
note that by mistake the change log referenced sanitizer.c instead of
sanitizer.def, consider that fixed on my local copy.
Thanks
Bernd.
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 14:15:54 +0100
Hi,
On
2015-01-15 Martin Uecker uec...@eecs.berkeley.edu
* MAINTAINERS: (Write After Approval): Add myself.
Index: MAINTAINERS
===
--- MAINTAINERS (Revision 219713)
+++ MAINTAINERS (Revision 219714)
@@ -576,6 +576,7 @@
Philipp
Normally when we see a call to a function with a reference parameter,
we've converted the argument to have reference type as well, so we can
always treat arguments as rvalues in potential_constant_expression. But
with templates we defer the conversions until instantiation time, so we
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Jiong Wang wrote:
+ if (bitsize + bitnum unit bitnum unit)
+{
+ warning (OPT_Wextra, write of HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_UNSIGNEDbit data
+outside the bound of destination object, data truncated into
+HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_UNSIGNEDbit,
Hi,
this patch fixes ICE during profiledbootstrap. The underlying problem is
somewhat hard
to fix (and not too important), so I will pospone it for next stage1.
Honza
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 219700)
+++
This patch is for PR 59710. As noted in that issue, the nios2 backend
only uses GP-relative addressing on objects defined locally to the
translation unit, where it knows definitely that the object is assigned
to the small data section under the current -G setting. Some other
backends also
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
Stage3 is closing rapidly. I've drained my queue of patches I was tracking
for gcc-5.However, note that I don't track everything. If it's a patch
for a backend, language other than C or seemingly has another maintainer
The recent libffi upgrade caused one of the 32-bit x86 libgo tests to
break. The problem case is a function that returns an empty struct--a
struct with no fields. The libffi library does not recognize the
existence of empty structs, presumably since they can't happen in C.
To work around this,
Hi,
after some testing on firefox, SPEC and C++ benchmark I decided to bump up
early-inlining-insns somewhat because I find inliner decisions to be
considerably
more robust this way allowing me to reduce inline-unit-growth.
There are several reasons for increasing early-inliner's activity. First
On 01/15/2015 09:58 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
The attached patch generates early DIEs for the C++
clones in the C++ parser.
This strikes me as an unnecessary abstraction violation.
+ /* Emit debug information for clones. */
+ symtab_node *node;
+ FOR_EACH_DEFINED_SYMBOL (node)
+if
Hi Jason. Hi Richard.
While adjusting the limbdo_die_list for early debug I noticed we weren't
early generating C++ constructors/destructors. This got me on a detour
of sorts.
I noticed dwarf2out's gen_member_die() disallows generation of clones
earlier, by design:
/* Don't include
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
This fixes an issue in dependence analysis and how we make pointer
dereferences visible to it. Basically dependence analysis works
on indices (assuming we deal with arrays) and thus never needs
sth like an access size (because indices are
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/14/2015 01:06 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Whenever I get to the LTO part of this project, I promise to start
documenting things better. This whole thing is a mystery.
Well - mostly to me as well ;) I'll let Honza
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:46:18AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
That last line means the compiler is free to delete a non-volatile
asm with a memory clobber if that asm is not needed for dataflow. Or
that is how I read it; it is trying to indicate that if you want to
prevent the memory
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
