On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 10, 2021, at 3:16 PM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Richard,
> >
> >> On Aug 10, 2021, at 10:22 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Especially in the VLA case but likely also in general (though unlikely
> sinc
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 02:43:06PM +0800, liuhongt wrote:
> Add define_insn_and_split to combine avx_vec_concatv16si/2 and
> avx512f_zero_extendv16hiv16si2_1 since the latter already zero_extend
> the upper bits, similar for other patterns which are related to
> pmovzx{bw,wd,dq}.
>
> It will do
On 11.08.21 00:46, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 8/10/21 2:29 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
[snip]
To conclude: I like the code changes (LGTM); the
'__float128' -> 'TFmode' comment change also matches the code.
However, I think both longer comments need to be updated.
OK. I used your wording verba
Hi!
tsan in some cases starts ignoring interceptors and only calls the
intercepted functions. But for realpath the behavior for NULL second argument
was only handled in the interceptor and intercepted function was the one
found by dlsym which is often one that doesn't handle NULL as second argume
This makes sure to not generate a shift of pointer types in
simplification of X < (cast) (1 << Y).
Bootstrap and regtest pending on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
2021-08-11 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/101858
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc): Guard simplification
of X < (
> build3 currently does no special processing for the FIELD_DECL operand,
> it just sets TREE_THIS_VOLATILE from operand zero for tcc_references.
>
> The C and C++ frontends have repeated patterns like
>
> ref = build3 (COMPONENT_REF, subtype, datum, subdatum,
>
On 2021/8/10 22:47, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On 2021/8/6 19:46, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, 3 Aug 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
>>>
loop split condition is moved between loop1 and loop2, the split bb's
count and probability sho
Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches writes:
>> On Aug 10, 2021, at 3:16 PM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Richard,
>>
>>> On Aug 10, 2021, at 10:22 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Especially in the VLA case but likely also in general (though unlikely
> since usually the recei
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/8/10 22:47, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> On 2021/8/6 19:46, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 3 Aug 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
> >>>
> loop split condition is moved between
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> > > The question is whether we instead want to amend build3 to
> > > set TREE_THIS_VOLATILE automatically when the FIELD_DECL has
> > > it set. At least for the Fortran FE cases the gimplifier
> > > fails
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 3:58 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 02:43:06PM +0800, liuhongt wrote:
> > Add define_insn_and_split to combine avx_vec_concatv16si/2 and
> > avx512f_zero_extendv16hiv16si2_1 since the latter already zero_extend
> > the upper bits, similar for other pa
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:33 AM Jojo R via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> Some target like RISC-V allow to group vector register as a whole,
>> and only operate part of it in fact, but the 'init-regs' pass will add
>> initialization
>> for uninitialized registers. Add this
My previous change broke the usage of gather for strided loads.
The following fixes it.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, will push as obvious.
2021-08-11 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/101861
* tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_load): Fix error in
previous
> So I'm leaning towards leaving build3 alone and fixing up frontends
> as issues pop up.
FWIW fine with me.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 04:29:10PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> On 8/10/21 12:34 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 11:17:05AM -0500, will schmidt wrote:
> >>On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 08:30 -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> >>>+; This will break for long double == _Float128. libgcc hi
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:28 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:33 AM Jojo R via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Some target like RISC-V allow to group vector register as a whole,
> >> and only operate part of it in fact, but the 'init-regs' p
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 04:46:11PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> OK. I used your wording verbatim for the first one. For the second
> one, I'm still pretty confused as I think it is at least theoretically
> possible on PowerPC to have a target with 64-bit long double (AIX?) that
Some
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 8:36 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 2:13 PM liuhongt wrote:
> >
> > Hi:
> > AVX512F supported vscalefs{s,d} which is the same as ldexp except the
> > second operand should be floating point.
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu{-m32,}.
Hi Folks
> On 11 Aug 2021, at 11:55, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 04:46:11PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> OK. I used your wording verbatim for the first one. For the second
>> one, I'm still pretty confused as I think it is at least theoretically
>> possible on
Hi guys,
Did you have a chance to take a look at the new version of this patch ?
Thanks,
Clément
From: CHIGOT, CLEMENT
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 9:16 AM
To: Jeff Law ; David Malcolm
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org ; David Edelsohn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aix: handl
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:29:06PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> > On 11 Aug 2021, at 11:55, Segher Boessenkool
> > wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 04:46:11PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> >> OK. I used your wording verbatim for the first one. For the second
> >> one, I'm still pretty
> While working on some function splitting changes, I've got a
> miscompilation in stagefeedback that I've tracked down to a
> complicated scenario:
>
> - ipa-modref miscomputes a function parameter as having EAF_DIRECT,
> because it's dereferenced and passed on to another function, but
> add_
Hi
Sorry for the delay, I had just miss this message.
I think you are clearly more expert than me for the changes you
propose. I had a look at the patch and it seems just fine as it keeps
the forwarding as expected. Nice simplification in
_NodeBuilder<_Select1st>, we indeed only need
> On Aug 11, 2021, at 2:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 10, 2021, at 3:16 PM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Richard,
>>>
On Aug 10, 2021, at 10:22 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> Especially in the
This completes the replacement of DECL_ATTRIBUTES (current_function_decl) with
the attribs local variable.
Tested on x86-64/Linux, applied on the mainline as obvious.
2021-08-11 Eric Botcazuo
* cfgexpand.c (expand_used_vars): Reuse attribs local variable.
--
Eric Botcazoudiff --gi
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 11, 2021, at 2:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Aug 10, 2021, at 3:16 PM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi, Richard,
> >>>
> On Aug 10, 2021, a
On 8/10/21 4:39 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The spaceship-synth-neg6.C testcase ICEs because we call cat_tag_for
on the explicit return type, but pointer types don't have
TYPE_LINKAGE_IDENTIFIER. The patch fixes that.
Or should I be checking for if (!CLASS_TYPE_P (type)) return cc_last;
instea
> On Aug 11, 2021, at 4:02 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>
> Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches writes:
>>> On Aug 10, 2021, at 3:16 PM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Richard,
>>>
On Aug 10, 2021, at 10:22 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> Especially in the VLA cas
On 8/9/21 5:07 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 4:42 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/19/21 6:05 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Constraint subsumption is implemented in two steps. The first step
computes the disjunctive (or conjunctive) normal form of one of the
constraints, and the se
> On Aug 11, 2021, at 8:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2021, at 2:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>>
> On Aug 10, 2021, at 3:16 PM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
>
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 11, 2021, at 8:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Aug 11, 2021, at 2:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
> >>>
>
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2021, at 8:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2021, at 8:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>>
> On Aug 11, 2021, at 2:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 09:42:56AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Checking CLASS_TYPE_P && decl_in_std_namespace (TYPE_MAIN_DECL) before
> looking at the name makes sense to me.
CLASS_TYPE_P is cheap, but isn't decl_in_std_namespace, especially when
it needs to walk inline namespaces, better done o
ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/575310.html
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 11:13 AM Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches <
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> ping?
>
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 15:07, Christophe LYON via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > This is a followup to Srinath's rece
Hi,
as already mentioned on the list, binutils 2.36 generates PIE executables by
default on native Windows (because --dynamicbase is the default) so it makes
sense to have a simple way to counter that and -no-pie seems appropriate,
all the more so that it is automatically passed when building the
This avoids decomposing hard-register accesses that masquerade as
loads.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.
2021-08-11 Richard Biener
PR target/101877
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (pass_forwprop::execute): Do not decompose
hard-register accesses.
---
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > So I'm leaning towards leaving build3 alone and fixing up frontends
> > as issues pop up.
>
> FWIW fine with me.
OK, so I pushed the original change (reposted below).
Bootstrapped / tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
>From e5a23d54d189f3
This fixes the testcase to not rely on the reference to
ashift_qi_1 being optimized out by RTL optimization via
help of the initregs pass that changes comparisons of
uninitialized data with a comparison that is always false.
Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.
2021-08-11 Richard Biener
This patch disables the init-regs pass on targets using LRA.
It's not clear as to what issue the init-regs papers over and
most definitely LRA should get it right. This leaves targets
still using reload unaffected but will expose any such LRA
bug if it exists, allowing it to be identified and fixe
On 8/11/21 2:05 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 11.08.21 00:46, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 8/10/21 2:29 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
[snip]
To conclude: I like the code changes (LGTM); the
'__float128' -> 'TFmode' comment change also matches the code.
However, I think both longer comments need to be
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 8/9/21 5:07 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 4:42 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
> > >
> > > On 7/19/21 6:05 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > Constraint subsumption is implemented in two steps. The first step
> > > > computes the disju
Hi all, this patch changed some RTL nodes to appropriate macros in Aarch64.c
backend using a script. Would this be okay for trunk?
Also, this is my first contribution, and I do not yet have commit
rights, so if everything is okay could someone commit this for me?
Thank you and I would apprec
I modified the routine “gimple_add_init_for_auto_var” as the following:
/* Generate initialization to automatic variable DECL based on INIT_TYPE.
Build a call to internal const function DEFERRED_INIT:
1st argument: SIZE of the DECL;
2nd argument: INIT_TYPE;
3rd argument: IS_VLA, 0
On August 11, 2021 5:30:40 PM GMT+02:00, Qing Zhao wrote:
>I modified the routine “gimple_add_init_for_auto_var” as the following:
>
>/* Generate initialization to automatic variable DECL based on INIT_TYPE.
> Build a call to internal const function DEFERRED_INIT:
> 1st argument: SIZE of t
Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:28 AM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:33 AM Jojo R via Gcc-patches
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Some target like RISC-V allow to group vector register as a whole,
>> >> and only operate part o
Implement these traits using the new built-ins that Jakub added
recently.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Wakely
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/type_traits (__cpp_lib_is_pointer_interconvertible)
(is_pointer_interconvertible_base_of_v)
(is_pointer_interconvertible_base_of
Enable store fusion on Power10.
Use the SCHED_REORDER hook to implement Power10 specific ready list reordering.
As of now this is just store fusion.
Things changed in this version of the patch
- Separate patch for additional load/store checks
- Move option check from is_fusable_store() to caller
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> 64-bit atomic operations. Allow targets to override the default type
> size with the new TARGET_GCOV_TYPE_SIZE target macro.
Hook, not macro.
> diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c b/gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c
> index f79f939bd10f..e85b60c79f49
Qing Zhao writes:
>> On Aug 11, 2021, at 4:02 AM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> I came up with the following solution:
>>>
>>> Define the IFN_DEFERRED_INIT function as:
>>>
>>> LHS = DEFERRED_INIT (SIZE of the DECL, INIT_TYPE, IS_VLA);
>>>
>>> if IS_VLA is false, the LHS is the DECL its
> On Aug 11, 2021, at 10:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On August 11, 2021 5:30:40 PM GMT+02:00, Qing Zhao
> wrote:
>> I modified the routine “gimple_add_init_for_auto_var” as the following:
>>
>> /* Generate initialization to automatic variable DECL based on INIT_TYPE.
>> Build a cal
Hi Kewen,
On 8/11/21 12:44 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
Hi,
This patch is to make prototypes of some Power10 built-in
functions consistent with what's in the documentation, as
well as the vector version. Otherwise, useless conversions
can be generated in gimple IR, and the vectorized versions
will hav
> On Aug 11, 2021, at 11:15 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>
> Qing Zhao writes:
>>> On Aug 11, 2021, at 4:02 AM, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
I came up with the following solution:
Define the IFN_DEFERRED_INIT function as:
LHS = DEFERRED_INIT (SIZE of the DECL,
Hi Kewen,
FWIW, it's easier on reviewers if you include the patch inline instead
of as an attachment.
On 8/11/21 1:56 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
Hi,
This patch is to add the support to make vectorizer able to
vectorize scalar version of some built-in functions with its
corresponding vector version
Hi Peter,
LGTM. Still needs maintainer review, of course. :)
Bill
On 8/10/21 6:37 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
PR101849 shows we ICE on a test case when we pass a non __vector_pair *
pointer to the __builtin_vsx_lxvp and __builtin_vsx_stxvp built-ins
that is cast to __vector_pair *. The problem
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 6:29 PM Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc-patches <
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > Sent: 24 June 2021 12:11
> > To: gcc Patches ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> >
> > Subject: [ARM] PR66791: Replace builtins for vdup_n and vmov
On August 11, 2021 6:22:00 PM GMT+02:00, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 11, 2021, at 10:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On August 11, 2021 5:30:40 PM GMT+02:00, Qing Zhao
>> wrote:
>>> I modified the routine “gimple_add_init_for_auto_var” as the following:
>>>
>>> /* Generate initializ
> On Aug 11, 2021, at 11:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On August 11, 2021 6:22:00 PM GMT+02:00, Qing Zhao
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2021, at 10:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> On August 11, 2021 5:30:40 PM GMT+02:00, Qing Zhao
>>> wrote:
I modified the routine “gimple_a
Hi,
This patch series contains a reimplementation of the clause-ordering code
in gimplify.c (omp_target_reorder_clauses), in anticipation of extending
support for lvalues in mapping clauses for OpenMP 5.0. This builds (or
will build) on a series of patches by Chung-Lin and myself that haven't
comp
From: Chung-Lin Tang
This is a version of a patch by Chung-Lin, merged to current mainline. Any
errors introduced are my own! It was previously posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/570365.html
Chung-Lin's description from the previous submission follows. (Edit:
it see
From: Chung-Lin Tang
This is a version "v4b" of a patch by Chung-Lin, merged to current
mainline. All errors introduced are my own! Previously posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/573166.html
Chung-Lin's description from the last submission follows.
This patch is th
It never makes sense for a GOMP_MAP_ATTACH_DETACH mapping to survive
beyond gimplify.c, so this patch rewrites such mappings to GOMP_MAP_ATTACH
or GOMP_MAP_DETACH unconditionally (rather than checking for a list
of types of OpenACC or OpenMP constructs), in cases where it hasn't
otherwise been done
From: Chung-Lin Tang
This is a version of a patch by Chung-Lin, merged to current mainline. Any
errors introduced are my own! It was previously posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/571195.html
Chung-Lin's description from the previous submission follows (edited a
litt
This patch slightly cleans up the semantics of extract_base_bit_offset,
in that the stripping of ARRAY_REFS/INDIRECT_REFS out of
extract_base_bit_offset is moved back into the (two) call sites of the
function. This is done in preparation for follow-on patches that extend
the function.
Previously p
(Previously submitted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/570398.html)
This patch is a second attempt at refactoring struct component mapping
handling for OpenACC/OpenMP during gimplification, after the patch I
posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2018-Nov
(Previously posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/570400.html)
This patch reworks indirect struct handling in gimplify.c (i.e. for
struct components mapped with "mystruct->a[0:n]", "mystruct->b", etc.),
for OpenACC. The key observation leading to these changes was that
c
This patch reimplements the omp_target_reorder_clauses function in
anticipation of supporting "deeper" struct mappings (that is, with
several structure dereference operators, or similar).
The idea is that in place of the (possibly quadratic) algorithm in
omp_target_reorder_clauses that greedily mo
On 8/9/21 1:16 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
It looks like we still don't recognize class-scope non-template
deduction guides even after r12-2260. This is because deduction guides
are handled in cp_parser_init_declarator after calling
cp_parser_declarator, but in the class-scope non-template case we
On 8/11/21 10:53 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 8/9/21 5:07 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 4:42 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/19/21 6:05 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Constraint subsumption is implemented in two steps. The first step
comp
On 8/11/21 10:01 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 09:42:56AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
Checking CLASS_TYPE_P && decl_in_std_namespace (TYPE_MAIN_DECL) before
looking at the name makes sense to me.
CLASS_TYPE_P is cheap, but isn't decl_in_std_namespace, especially when
it need
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 8/9/21 1:16 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > It looks like we still don't recognize class-scope non-template
> > deduction guides even after r12-2260. This is because deduction guides
> > are handled in cp_parser_init_declarator after calling
> > cp_par
On 8/9/21 1:15 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here grokdeclarator is emitting the error
error: class template placeholder ‘Foo’ not permitted in this context
during the tentative (and ultimately futile) parse of 'x' as a function
declaration. This happens because when parsing 'Foo{1}',
cp_parser_
On 8/11/21 2:29 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 8/9/21 1:16 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
It looks like we still don't recognize class-scope non-template
deduction guides even after r12-2260. This is because deduction guides
are handled in cp_parser_init_decl
On 8/6/21 11:34 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:41:39 -0400
Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/22/21 7:15 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
From: Sergei Trofimovich
r12-1804 ("cp: add support for per-location warning groups.") among other
things removed warning suppression from a fe
On 8/6/21 4:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The paper that introduced constinit mentioned in rationale that constinit
can be used on externs as well and that it can be used to avoid the
thread_local initialization wrappers, because the standard requires that
if constinit is present on any declar
Dear all,
the checks for the STAT= and ERRMSG= arguments to the coarray SYNC statements
did not properly handle several cases, such as named constants (parameters).
While fixing this, I adjusted the code similarly to what was recently done
for (DE)ALLOCATE. We now also accept function references
*Ping*
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 03. August 2021 um 23:17 Uhr
> Von: "Harald Anlauf"
> An: "Harald Anlauf"
> Cc: "Tobias Burnus" , "Bernhard Reutner-Fischer"
> , "Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches"
> , "fortran"
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/100950 - ICE in
> output_constructor_regular_field, at
*Ping*
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 04. August 2021 um 23:09 Uhr
> Von: "Harald Anlauf"
> An: "fortran" , "gcc-patches"
> Betreff: [PATCH, part2] PR fortran/98411 [10/11/12 Regression] Pointless:
> Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, ...
>
> Dear all,
>
> here's the second part that should fix
On 8/4/21 6:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As I've said earlier and added xfails in gen-attrs-76.C test,
https://eel.is/c++draft/namespace.udir#nt:using-directive
has attribute-specifier-seq[opt] at the start, not at the end before ;
as gcc is expecting.
IMHO we should continue parsing at the e
On 8/3/21 4:04 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here we're rejecting the default template argument
requires (T t) { x(t); }
because we consider the 't' in the requirement to be a local variable
(according to local_variable_p), and we generally forbid local variables
from appearing inside template ar
Hi,
I met another issue for “address taken” auto variable, see below for details:
the testing case: (gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-16.c)
int foo, bar;
static
void decode_reloc(int reloc, int *is_alt)
{
if (reloc >= 20)
*is_alt = 1;
else if (reloc >= 10)
*is_alt = 0;
}
void
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 05:55:39AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 04:46:11PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> > OK. I used your wording verbatim for the first one. For the second
> > one, I'm still pretty confused as I think it is at least theoretically
> >
On 8/3/21 4:04 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here we're rejecting the default template argument
requires (T t) { x(t); }
because we consider the 't' in the requirement to be a local variable
(according to local_variable_p), and we generally forbid local variables
from appearing inside template ar
Hi,
I finally decided to take another approach to resolve this issue, it resolved
all the potential issues with the “address taken” auto variable.
The basic idea is to avoid generating the temporary variable in the beginning.
As you mentioned, "The reason is that alt_reloc is memory (because i
I had a file-path to sources with the substring "new" in it,
and (only) this test regressed compared to results from
another build without "new" in the name.
The test does
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "new" 4 "original" } }
i.e. the contents of the tree-dump-file .original needs to match
t
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:19:58 -0400
Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 8/6/21 11:34 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:41:39 -0400
> > Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/22/21 7:15 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> >>> From: Sergei Trofimovich
> >>>
> >>> r12-1804 ("cp: add suppo
This test assumes that the same sequence of three values cannot occur,
which is incorect. It's unlikely, but not impossible.
Perform the check in a loop, so that in the unlikely event of an
identical sequence, we retry. If the library code is buggy it will keep
producing the same sequence and the
On 8/3/21 4:04 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here during constexpr evaluation of
std::construct_at(&a._M_value)
we find ourselves in cxx_eval_store_expression where the target object
is 'a._M_value' and the initializer is {}. Since _M_value is an empty
[[no_unique_address]] member we don't creat
Hi Bill,
Thanks for your prompt review!
on 2021/8/12 上午12:34, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Kewen,
>
> FWIW, it's easier on reviewers if you include the patch inline instead of as
> an attachment.
>
> On 8/11/21 1:56 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch is to add the support to make vectori
On 8/11/21 2:21 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Hi,
as already mentioned on the list, binutils 2.36 generates PIE executables by
default on native Windows (because --dynamicbase is the default) so it makes
sense to have a simple way to counter that and -no-pie seems appropriate,
all the more so that it
On 2021/8/11 17:16, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
On 2021/8/10 22:47, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
Thanks,
On 2021/8/6 19:46, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021, Xionghu Luo wrote:
loop split condition is moved be
Hi:
This is the patch i'm going to checkin.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu{-m32,};
2021-08-12 Uros Bizjak
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/98309
* config/i386/i386.md (avx512f_scalef2): New
define_insn.
(ldexp3): Adjust for new define_insn.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 7:16 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 8:36 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 2:13 PM liuhongt wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi:
> > > AVX512F supported vscalefs{s,d} which is the same as ldexp except the
> > > second operand should be floating
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 12:05 PM liuhongt wrote:
>
> Hi:
> This is the patch i'm going to checkin.
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu{-m32,};
>
>
> 2021-08-12 Uros Bizjak
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR target/98309
> * config/i386/i386.md (avx512f_scalef2): New
>
Hi:
This is another patch to optimize vec_perm_expr to match vpmov{dw,dq,wb}
under AVX512.
For scenarios(like pr101846-2.c) where the upper half is not used, this patch
generates better code with only one vpmov{wb,dw,qd} instruction. For
scenarios(like pr101846-3.c) where the upper half is actu
94 matches
Mail list logo
