Here is a small patch to allow the special maths functions that came in
with TR29124 into C++17 in Jacksonville.
I am leaving the TR29124 access with __STDCPP_WANT_MATH_SPEC_FUNCS__ for
C++ < 17.
I added the SD-6 feature macro:
#define __cpp_lib_math_special_functions 20163L
Passes testing on
On 03/10/2016 03:48 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 03:44:26AM -0500, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Here is a small patch to allow the special maths functions that came in with
TR29124 into C++17 in Jacksonville.
I am leaving the TR29124 access with __STDCPP_WANT_MATH_SPEC_FUNCS__
On 03/10/2016 05:24 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
--- include/bits/specfun.h
(svn+ssh://e...@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/libstdc++-v3/include) (working copy)
+++ svn+ssh://e...@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/libstdc++-v3/include
(revision 234098)
@@ -1,6 +1,6
On 03/11/2016 10:55 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The change approved in Jacksonville was to only add the special
functions to and not
That's easy.
OK, since they changed that and the macro and made it nonconditional I
should also drop the old-style macros __WANT_MATH_CANNEVERREMEMBER__ and
th
I wanted to ship the TR29124 special math functions in libstdc++ with
some documentation.
More could be done but this covers the function definitions, argument
ranges, template parms, and arguments.
There is a little mainpage with some overview, history, biblio, and links.
2016-04-08 Edward Sm
On 12/27/2015 11:30 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I think we should change the language in the c++0x_warning.h:
Agreed, OK for trunk and gcc-5-branch, thanks.
N.B. s/Ramove/Remove/ in the changelog.
Done,
Here are the patch and CL as applied to trunk and gcc-5.
Thanks,
Ed
Index: include/bits/
Now that libstdc++ installs a proper math.h we can piggyback on that to
put in the last bit of TR29124.
This patch adds the math special functions to c_compatibility/math.h in
the global namespace.
I remove the XFAILs from the compile_2.cc tests.
This converts 21 XFAILs into 21 PASSes.
Teste
On 01/21/2016 07:29 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 20/01/16 20:30 -0500, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Now that libstdc++ installs a proper math.h we can piggyback on that
to put in the last bit of TR29124.
This patch adds the math special functions to c_compatibility/math.h
in the global namespace
On 01/22/2016 05:39 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/01/16 19:07 -0500, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 01/21/2016 07:29 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 20/01/16 20:30 -0500, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Now that libstdc++ installs a proper math.h we can piggyback on
that to put in the last bit of
I think we should change the language in the c++0x_warning.h:
Index: include/bits/c++0x_warning.h
===
--- include/bits/c++0x_warning.h(revision 231922)
+++ include/bits/c++0x_warning.h(working copy)
@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@
anch is for development of TR29124 Special math Functions,
> for the C++ runtime library
> See href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3060.pdf";>
> . It is maintained by Ed Smith-Rowland
> <mailto:3dw...@verizon.net";>3dw...@verizon.net>.
>
Here is an implementation of P0025
An algorithm to "clamp" a value between a pair of boundary values.
Testing is almost finished - looks good so far.
OK if testing passes?
I didn't see a feature test in any of the SD-6 papers or P0025.
2016-07-15 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
OK for trunk, thanks.
I didn't see a feature test in any of the SD-6 papers or P0025.
p0096r3 proposes __cpp_lib_clamp = 201603.
I added the feature macro and committed the attached as 238383.
Thanks,
Ed
2016-07-15 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Implement C++17 P002
This patch defines
operator""zu(unsigned long long __n)
for size_t literals.
for (auto k = 0zul; k < v.size(); ++k)
...
Testing on x86-64-linux is finishing but I'm past these tests.
OK?
Ed
2016-07-21 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Implement C++17 P0330 size_t
All,
Here is the library extension for uniform_inside _sphere_distribution.
It works from discs and has been tested up through 12-dimentional spheres.
The patch dispatches to rejection for Dim<8, transform otherwise as
discussed earlier.
Builds and tests cleanly on x86_64-linux.
OK?
Ed
Inde
On 10/26/2016 05:01 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25/10/16 08:20 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
+explicit
+param_type(_RealType __radius = _RealType(1))
+: _M_radius(__radius)
+{
+ _GLIBCXX_DEBUG_ASSERT(_M_radius > _RealType(0));
Nowadays we're able to do
Since the default is C++14 it seems apropos to *not* treat that C++
version thusly in the warning in libstdc++.
Ed
OK for trunk? And maybe some 6 branch later?
2016-04-17 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
* include/bits/c++14_warning.h: Do not refer C++14 as experimental.
This is actually PR libstdc++/86655.
Thank you for reminding me Andre.
I remove the throw for m > l and just return 0. This is also done for
sph_legendre.
This build and tests clean on x86_64-linux.
OK?
Ed
2018-03-04 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
PR libstdc++/86655
On 3/4/19 3:05 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 04/02/19 14:26 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/01/19 14:50 -0500, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
PR libstdc++/88996 Implement P0439R0
Make std::memory_order a scoped enumeration.
* include/bits/atomic_base.h: For C++20 make memory_order a
All,
I's very late but uniform container erasure is, I think, the last little
tidbit to graduate from fundamentals/v2 to std at the last meeting. I
think it would be a shame not to nudge this into gcc-9. The routines
are very short so I just copied them. Ditto the testcases (with
adjustment
On 11/26/18 6:18 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/11/18 13:54 -0500, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
All,
I's very late but uniform container erasure is, I think, the last
little tidbit to graduate from fundamentals/v2 to std at the last
meeting. I think it would be a shame not to nudge this
On 11/28/18 7:25 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28/11/18 12:12 -0500, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Index: testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/erasure.cc
===
--- testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/erasure.cc (nonexistent)
+++ testsuite
On 11/29/18 9:09 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 29/11/18 08:47 -0500, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Fixed with 266616.
Thanks!
Index: include/std/deque
===
--- include/std/deque (revision 266567)
+++ include/std/deque (working
On 11/26/18 6:18 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/11/18 13:54 -0500, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
All,
I's very late but uniform container erasure is, I think, the last
little tidbit to graduate from fundamentals/v2 to std at the last
meeting. I think it would be a shame not to nudge this
This version of erase_if/erase returning number erased actually build
and tests cleanly on x86_64-linux.
Is this what you has in mind for this? I basically return the number of
erased items for all the things
Ed
Greetings,
This patch implements starts_with and ends_with for basic_string and
basic_string_view for C++20.
This builds and tests cleanly on x86_64-linux.
Ed
2018-11-30 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Implement P0457R2 String Prefix and Suffix Checking.
* incl
On 11/30/18 5:33 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 29/11/18 21:35 -0500, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Greetings,
This patch implements starts_with and ends_with for basic_string and
basic_string_view for C++20.
This was on my TODO list, thanks for taking care of it.
+#if __cplusplus > 2017
Committed as obvious 266788.
Ed
2018-12-03 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
PR libstdc++/88341 - Complex norm doesn't compile with C++11
* include/std/complex (_S_do_it): Make C++20 constexpr.
* testsuite/26_numerics/complex/value_operations/pr88341.cc: New t
On 11/3/18 10:09 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/23/18 7:45 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Greetings,
This is an almost trivial patch to get the correct sign for tgammaq.
I don't have a testcase as I don't know where to put one.
OK?
Ed Smith-Rowland
tgammaq.CL
2018-10-24 Edward Smi
On 11/3/18 10:09 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/23/18 7:45 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Greetings,
This is an almost trivial patch to get the correct sign for tgammaq.
I don't have a testcase as I don't know where to put one.
OK?
Ed Smith-Rowland
tgammaq.CL
2018-10-24 Edward Smi
On 11/5/18 1:19 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I looked in glibc. Unfortunately, I see how they have the same mistake:
glibc/math/w_tgammal_compat.c:
long double
__tgammal(long double x)
{
int local_signgam;
long double y
Greetings,
This is late but I wanted to put it out there just to finish a thing.
It's fairly straightforward constexpr of operators and some simple
functions for std::complex.
The only thing that jumped out was the norm function. We had this:
struct _Norm_helper
{
template
All,
This patch has been in my queue for a while.
I believe it is waiting on Copyright assignment for Michele. Is this
still true?
Ed
2018-11-16 Michele Pezzutti
Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
PR libstdc++/83566 - cyl_bessel_j returns wrong result for x>1
On 11/16/18 12:38 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote:
Am Fr., 16. Nov. 2018 um 18:13 Uhr schrieb Ed Smith-Rowland
<3dw...@verizon.net>:
Greetings,
This is late but I wanted to put it out there just to finish a thing.
It's fairly straightforward constexpr of operators and some simple
functi
On 11/16/18 5:32 PM, Michele Pezzutti wrote:
Hi.
My Copyright assignment process is complete (done in Feb 2018).
Michele
On 16/11/2018 18:23, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
All,
This patch has been in my queue for a while.
I believe it is waiting on Copyright assignment for Michele. Is this
On 11/16/18 3:53 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 11/16/18 12:38 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote:
Am Fr., 16. Nov. 2018 um 18:13 Uhr schrieb Ed Smith-Rowland
<3dw...@verizon.net>:
Greetings,
This is late but I wanted to put it out there just to finish a thing.
It's fairly straightforward c
On 11/19/18 6:13 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 16/11/18 19:39 -0500, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
@@ -322,67 +323,43 @@
//@{
/// Return new complex value @a x plus @a y.
template
- inline complex<_Tp>
+ inline _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR complex<_Tp>
operator+(const compl
On 1/1/19 12:45 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
Hello,
In working on updating the copyright year notices for the GDB files,
I noticed something very minor regarding the patch which added the
file below (the same file was copied in gdb's testsuite); it looks
like the year range for one of the files is
Greetings,
This makes memory_order in a scoped enum *only* for C++20.
This is built and tested on x86_64-linux.
OK?
Index: include/bits/atomic_base.h
===
--- include/bits/atomic_base.h (revision 268246)
+++ include/bits/atomic_
On 10/24/2015 11:38 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 8 May 2015 at 15:05, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 05/07/2015 12:06 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Hi Ed,
The C++ committee is considering the
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4437.pdf
proposal to
I accidentally added an extra column to the C++14 language stats by
duplicating a column for the SD-6 feature test macros.
This one-liner fixes it.
I'll need someone to apply this...
Sorry.
Ed
? class_key.txt
? help
? patch
? patch_cxx14
? patch_cxx14_2
? patch_cxx14_3
? patch_cxx1y
? patch_
This has been in me tree for a good while.
It is fairly simple and adds C++ experimental container erasure.
Builds and tests cleanly on x86_64-linux.
OK?
Index: include/Makefile.am
===
--- include/Makefile.am (revision 222573)
+++
And make_array, which isn't in the working paper yet, so I'd prefer to
leave that part out for now.
D'oh! Sorry about that.. Removed.
The Doxygen @headername command tells users which header they are
supposed to include, rather than this one. Since there is no
header that's wrong. I'd just
On 04/30/2015 02:01 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote:
Shouldn't the "one-liner" forwarding function templates be declared as
inline? - Daniel
You are right.
This builds and tests clean on x86_64-linux.
OK?
2015-05-01 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Inline one-line erasure dispat
On 01/25/2015 05:04 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Ed,
On Friday 2015-01-02 13:59, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I would like peoples opinion of adding another column to the tables
indicating C++ feature status for C++11 and C++14 that contains the
relevant SD-6 feature macro.
Sure, that makes sense
Gerald,
Could I get a hand on checking in this last addition?
-m 'Add a blurb to htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html to explain the
__has_cpp_attribute and
the equivalent __has_attribute macros.'
Thanks,
Ed
Sorry, I forgot to add gcc-patches.
Index: htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html
I just look to see if a lexed number in libcpp ends in a '.
If so, back up one character and let string processing handle it.
I get one warning and one error for each instance but I'd rather not
error when it should pass.
Built and tests clean on x86_64-linux.
OK?
libcpp/
2015-03-09 Edwa
On 03/08/2015 02:52 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 02:33:03PM -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I just look to see if a lexed number in libcpp ends in a '.
If so, back up one character and let string processing handle it.
I get one warning and one error for each instance bu
Forget this last patch.
The syntax of my dg lines was wrong and I'm seeing errors I'm not sure I
like.
I need to look at this further.
I'm sorry for the noise.
OK,
Here is a new try at PR c++/64626 - C++14 single quote should not always
be a digit separator.
I decided to look for multiple terminating single quotes.
The test cases have bee adjusted and debugged.
Built and tested on x86_64-linux.
Ed
libcpp/
2015-03-16 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw.
On 06/15/2015 12:05 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/20/2015 11:28 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/02/2015 04:16 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
This extends' static assert to not require a message string.
I elected to make this work also for C++11 and C++14 and warn only with
-pedantic.
I think
On 06/17/2015 10:23 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/15/2015 07:14 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I wanted to fix it up as per your suggestion. If someone wants it now I
can retest and commit. Otherwise give me a bit more time.
Someone in LWG was asking about it, and I figured it wouldn't
On 06/17/2015 03:22 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/17/2015 01:53 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I tried the obvious: an error message with %qE and got 'false'.
constexpr values are evaluated early on.
Is there a possibility that late folding could help or is that
completely differe
I apologize to all who got this earlier.
I forgot to send to the list.
This patch adds UTF-8 character literals to C++:
auto c = u8'c';
This is mostly a straight forward preprocessor exercise.
I only allow these characters in -std=c++1z and -std=gnu++1z.
I figure we can expand that easily w
On 11/13/2015 10:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25 October 2015 at 20:48, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25 October 2015 at 17:46, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
On 10/24/2015 11:38 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 8 May 2015 at 15:05, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
On 11/16/2015 07:28 PM, Florian Goth wrote:
Hi all,
just a quick note that I'm still around...
Any particular pointers how I can help in improving the implementation?
Cheers,
Florian.
Gesendet: Samstag, 14. November 2015 um 21:40 Uhr
Von: "Ed Smith-Rowland" <3dw...@verizon.
On 05/01/2015 05:01 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/05/15 16:37 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Tested on Linux-x64.
Implement observer_ptr.
Thanks! Committed with some minor formatting changes.
I've also committed this to add feature-test macros and update the
docs. Tested powerpc64le-l
On 05/02/2015 05:42 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/05/15 10:40 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/05/15 22:02 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 05/01/2015 05:01 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/05/15 16:37 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Tested on Linux-x64.
Implement observer_ptr
This extends' static assert to not require a message string.
I elected to make this work also for C++11 and C++14 and warn only with
-pedantic.
I think many people just write
static_assert(thing, "");
.
I took the path of building an empty string in the parser in this case.
I wasn't sure if s
In addition to a PR this is 1/2 of a C=+17 feature. (The other half -
really a separate thing - is attributes on namespaces).
I wonder if we should pedwarn for < C++17?
Or it could be just an extension for < C++17 - I guess that would match
with clang.
if (SCOPED_ENUM_P (newtag))
diff --g
On 05/07/2015 09:59 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:17:20PM -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
In addition to a PR this is 1/2 of a C=+17 feature. (The other half - really
a separate thing - is attributes on namespaces).
Ah, nice, I wasn't aware. For the record, this is
On 05/02/2015 04:16 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
This extends' static assert to not require a message string.
I elected to make this work also for C++11 and C++14 and warn only
with -pedantic.
I think many people just write
static_assert(thing, "");
.
I took the path of bu
On 05/22/2015 06:19 PM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
On 22.05.2015 12:10, Marek Polacek wrote:
Thanks, applied. Here's the final version.
By the way, we have a feature test macro, __cpp_attributes=200809 which
can be used to determine, whether C++11 attribute syntax is supported by
the compiler.
I
Jason,
My reading of
1.5 Feature-testing recommendations (Informative)
/2 ... The recommended macro name is __cpp_experimental_ followed by the
string in the “Macro
name suffix” column in Table 1. ...
Says change __cpp_concepts to __cpp_experimental_concepts
Cool beans on getting this in.
E
Greetings,
Now that most systems have uchar.h for conversion between char16_t* and
char32_t* to multibyte (analogue of wchar.h and cwchar) i think we
should check off this last little crumb of C++11.
I submitted this a while back but Jonathan suggested improvements and it
took me a hot minut
On 08/13/2015 10:51 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/08/15 10:37 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Greetings,
Now that most systems have uchar.h for conversion between char16_t*
and char32_t* to multibyte (analogue of wchar.h and cwchar) i think
we should check off this last little crumb of C
OK.
This tested clean because it didn't install the headers.
So Jonathan. I am going to throw in the sponge on the configury.
Could you have a look and carry this over the finish line?
Ed
On 10/02/2014 06:14 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/10/14 11:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Note Ed's recent changes. Committed to CVS.
And fix a markup error that I expected xmllint to catch :-(
Thank you! I tried to do this and couldn't for permissions. I'm
probably not doing it right.
Built and tested clean on x86_64-linux.
OK?
Ed
2014-10-03 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
* include/std/type_traits: Add is_final<> type trait for C++14.
* testsuite/util/testsuite_tr1.h: Add
* testsuite/20_util/is_final/requirements/
explicit_insta
trait going on the branch too).
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Merrill"
To: "Ed Smith-Rowland" <3dw...@verizon.net>, "Jonathan Wakely"
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, "thiago macieira"
Sent: Thursday, 2 October, 2014 4:40:03 PM
Subject: Re
Greetings,
There was some feeling that not allowing [[deprecated]] for C++ was a
little extreme.
This patch builds and tests clean on x86_64-linux. OK?
Ed
gcc/c-family:
2014-10-06 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
* c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c: Move __cpp_attribute_deprecat
On 10/02/2014 10:24 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/10/14 10:09 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/02/2014 06:14 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/10/14 11:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Note Ed's recent changes. Committed to CVS.
And fix a markup error that I expected xmllint to
On 10/09/2014 05:54 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 9, 2014, at 11:56 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2014-10-09 Uros Bizjak
* g++.dg/cpp1y/feat-cxx14.C: Variable templates not in yet.
(dg-do): Use c++1y target.
Tested on x86_64. OK for branch?
So, I need Ed or Jason to review it…
Yes, plea
On 06/25/2014 10:03 AM, Andrew Sutton wrote:
I did a full 3-stage bootstrap which is the default these days.
I'll try --disable-bootstrap and see what happens.
I just did a full bootstrap build and got the same errors. The errors
are correct for C++11, which was enabled by default in this branch
So is C++14 a done deal with a __cplusplus date and all?
I've been waiting for some news or a trip report from Rapperswil and
have seen nothing on isocpp.
I've been thinking of adding a thing or two to C++1z like clang has -
The Disabling trigraph expansion by default looks easy.
Ed
On 06/26/2014 11:28 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/26/2014 09:38 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
So is C++14 a done deal with a __cplusplus date and all?
The C++14 draft was finalized at the February meeting in Issaquah; the
ratification process isn't quite done, but I haven't heard
On 06/27/2014 05:39 PM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60249
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
Patch looks *great*. If it works, please send it to mailing list ASAP.
I think I finally got these weird user-defined string literal bugs.
"D
ates (not available in C++11).
Built and tested clean on x86_64-linux.
OK?
I would also like to apply this to 4.9.
Ed Smith-Rowland
cp/
2014-06-28 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
PR c++/58781
PR c++/60249
PR c++/59867
* parser.c (cp_parser
Support operator"" ""(...) per CWG 1473.
I'll be AFK over the holiday.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux.
OK?
I'm less sure if this is appropriate for 4.9.
Index: cp/parser.c
===
--- cp/parser.c (revision 212248)
+++ cp/par
This patch addresses an old issue of warning about macro touching string
literal even if the code is skipped:
#define BAZ "baz"
#if 0
"bar"BAZ
#endif
Just skip the warning Wliteral-suffix if the preprocessor is skipping.
Built and tested on x86_64-linux.
OK?
And for 4.9
The title says it all.
I've been bootstrapping and testing with this on x86_64-linux for a month.
OK?
Ed
2014-07-10 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Add the logistic_distribution as an extension.
* include/ext/random: Add the logistic_distribution.
* includ
Here are some C++ versioning changes reflecting C++14 status and adding
c++1z. It is a followup to Jason's patch on 2014-06-26 adding std=c++1z,
etc.
This will allow us to start making C++1z changes to the preprocessor
(n3981 remove trigraphs).
In fact, I made trigraphs opt-in for both c++1z
Here is a preprocessor patch to make error messages show C++11 and other
relevant C++ language instead of C99.
Built and tested on x86_64-linux.
OK?
libcpp/
2014-07-09 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
PR CPP/61389
* macro.c (_cpp_arguments_ok, parse_params, create
Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/digit-sep-neg.C
===
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/digit-sep-neg.C(revision 212440)
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/digit-sep-neg.C(working copy)
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
i = 1048''576; // { dg-error
On 07/10/2014 06:16 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
.. I have another comment: are we sure the usual strategy:
template
result_type
operator()(_UniformRandomNumberGenerator& __urng)
{ return this->operator()(__urng, this->_M_param); }
doesn't make sense here too?
Paolo.
>> Look OK
On 07/11/2014 11:42 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 07/11/2014 05:38 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
OK?
Ok, thanks, but please adjust the dates you have on the testcases to
the date of the actual commit (I suppose today or tomorrow)
Thanks again!
Paolo.
As committed.
Thanks all for looking
PING!
Support operator"" ""(...) per CWG 1473.
This brings full string parsing to literal operator declarations including
string chunk concatenation and appropriate errors.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux.
OK?
I'm less sure if this is appropriate for 4.9 even when it opens.
cp/
Greetings,
This old bug involved C++98 accepting hex floats without complaint.
I also split the error messages between C and C++ like in the recent PR
61389 patch.
Bootstrapped and tested clean on x86_64-linux.
OK?
libcpp/
2014-07-12 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
PR
> are these dummy implementations intended?
Yes. There is no state. The only parameter is the dimensionality
which is a template parameter.
We do often serialize underlying helper distributions, in your case the
normal distribution _M_n.
While the normal distribution mean and stddev are tr
On 07/13/2014 10:11 AM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
So I would just serialize _M_n here.
It has fixed parameters. This would mean unnecessary work. When you
try to use the parameter of the sphere distribution the
On 07/14/2014 04:14 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 07/14/2014 09:58 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
FAIL: ext/random/arcsine_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for
excess errors)
Excess errors:
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20140714/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/random.tcc:1587:22:
error: '_M_n' was not declar
Braden,
I've played with this and it seems to work nicely.
Only one comment: Could you put the test cases in the C++14 subdirectory?
g++.dg/template/cpp1y/var-templ1.C
^
We should CC Jason on all this.
Also, do you have your FSF paperwork in place?
Thanks,
Ed
This little annoyance has bugged me a couple of times over the years:
template struct A {};
template using B = int;
template class X> struct C;
C ca; // ok
C cb; // ok, not a class template
template typename X> struct D; // error, cannot use typename
here
C++17 it seems allows typename in tem
On 07/22/2014 01:56 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
+/* Parse a type-parameter-key.
+
+ type-parameter-key:
+ class
+ typedef
+
+ Returns the kind of type-parameter-key specified, or none_type to indicate
+ error. */
+
Typo above, should be typename, not typedef.
Thanks!
New patch
Braden,
Great work on this. In addition to helping with constraints there is at
least one new library feature that depends on constexpr variable templates.
For my two cents it would be good to get just the constexpr variable
templates, aka n3651, in now as a first stage - it's quite usable.
On 07/23/2014 06:05 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/22/2014 01:53 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
+if (cxx_dialect < cxx1z)
+ {
+/* Look for the `class' keyword. */
+cp_parser_require_keyword (parser, RID_CLASS, RT_CLASS);
+ }
+else
+ {
+/*
On 07/24/2014 11:32 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/23/2014 10:31 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
+pedwarn (token->location, OPT_Wpedantic,
+ "ISO C++ forbids typename key in template template
parameter");
This should mention -std=c++1z.
+ if (tag_type
On 03/08/2014 01:33 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 8 March 2014 16:29, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 03/08/2014 11:27 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
The title says it all. This was just an oversight in the original patch.
This could wait until stage 1 obviously. I just wanted to post it.
There
How difficult would it be to make partial specializations work:
// Write n*pi once for every possible type
template
constexpr Tp npi = N * Tp(3.1415926535897932385L);
// Partial specialization for int type.
template
constexpr double npi = N * double(3.1415926535897932385L);
On 07/16/2014 12:18 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jul 16, 2014, at 7:51 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
Deprecate c++1y. Chane language to reflect greater confidence in C++14
Chane -> Change. I looked at your patch, all seems fine. I like the
documentation edit
1 - 100 of 334 matches
Mail list logo
