I suspected that much. It would be good to have a libcilkrts/README.gcc
describing the rules which changes can go into the gcc tree directly, which
need to go upstream first, and how. libo and libsanitizer already have this.
Hi Rainer,
It is mentioned under the "CONTRIBUTIONS" sections
Hi Jeff,
I thought about this for a minute and I don't think I need to use the
lang_hooks. I could do this change right before calling gimplify_cilk_spawn. I
have attached the fixed patch and have answered your questions below. Here are
the ChangeLog entries:
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
201
> -Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 6:17 PM
> To: 'Jeff Law'; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Zamyatin, Igor
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] PR 60586
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Je
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 3:26 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Zamyatin, Igor
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR 60586
>
> On 08/31/2015 06:04 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> >
Hello Everyone,
This patch will fix the bug reported in Bugzilla, PR 60586. The issue
was that the spawned function's function arguments must not be pushed into the
nested/lambda function. This patch should fix that issue.
I have tested this on x86_64 (linux and Cygwin flavors). Is this
PING!
> -Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:43 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix for PR c++/60198
>
> Hello Everyone,
> Attached, please find a patch that is a fix for PR c++/60198. Is this O
Hello Everyone,
Attached, please find a patch that is a fix for PR c++/60198. Is this
OK for trunk?
Here are the changelog entries:
Cp/ChangeLog
+2015-02-19 Balaji V. Iyer
+
+ PR c++/60198
+ * pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build): Added CILK_SPAWN_STMT case.
+
Testsuite/ChangeLo
Hello Everyone,
Attached, please find a patch that is a fix for PR c++/60269.
Tested on x86_64 and have no regression issues. Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
+2015-02-18 Balaji V. Iyer
+
+ PR c++/60269
+ * parser.c (cp_parser_cilk_simd_vectorlength)
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 9:29 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Alexander Ivchenko; Richard Biener; GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: Fix PR60644
>
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:23:59PM +00
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 8:06 AM
> To: Alexander Ivchenko
> Cc: Richard Biener; GCC Patches; Iyer, Balaji V
> Subject: Re: Fix PR60644
>
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:46:13PM +0400,
I mis-spelled the "org" as "og" and thus the email got bounced. So, here it is
again.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-----
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 4:34 PM
> To: 'Jakub Jelinek'
> Cc: gcc-patc...@gcc.g
> -Original Message-
> From: Andi Kleen [mailto:a...@firstfloor.org]
> Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 3:38 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Andi Kleen; Tobias Burnus; Gerald Pfeifer; gcc-patches; Jakub Jelinek
> Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] RFC - mention Cilk Plus in the GCC
> -Original Message-
> From: Tobias Burnus [mailto:bur...@net-b.de]
> Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 3:32 PM
> To: Andi Kleen; Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Gerald Pfeifer; gcc-patches; Jakub Jelinek
> Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] RFC - mention Cilk Plus in the GCC 4.9 release notes
> -Original Message-
> From: Tobias Burnus [mailto:bur...@net-b.de]
> Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 3:06 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; Gerald Pfeifer
> Cc: gcc-patches; Jakub Jelinek
> Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] RFC - mention Cilk Plus in the GCC 4.9 release notes
>
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Andi Kleen
> Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 3:13 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Tobias Burnus; Gerald Pfeifer; gcc-patches; Jakub Jelinek
> Subject: Re: [w
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Tobias Burnus
> Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 2:24 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; Gerald Pfeifer
> Cc: gcc-patches; Jakub Jelinek
> Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] RF
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:ger...@pfeifer.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 1:29 PM
> To: Tobias Burnus
> Cc: gcc-patches; Iyer, Balaji V; Jakub Jelinek
> Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] RFC - mention Cilk Plus in the GCC 4.9 release notes
>
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Marek Polacek
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 8:39 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Properly check for
Hi Jakub,
Did you get a chance to look at this?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 6:17 PM
> To: 'Jakub Jelinek'
> Cc: 'Jason Merrill'; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Hernand
Hello Everyone,
This patch will fix two minor issues in libcilkrts. First being that we
default to ABI 0 and secondly, fix an issue to initialize the stack frame
correctly. All the changes are in libcilkrts and does not cause any regression
failures.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
diff --git
> Yeah, it passed regtesting. Note that we also ICE on e.g.
> int
> foo (void)
> {
> int i;
> i = (_Cilk_spawn foo ()) + 1;
> return i;
> }
>
> I don't know whether this is valid use of _Cilk_spawn though. In any case,
> this patch addresses only _Cilk_spawn in return statements.
This is
Hi Marek,
Thanks for working on this. Please see my comments below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marek Polacek [mailto:pola...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 12:43 PM
> To: GCC Patches
> Cc: Iyer, Balaji V
> Subject: [PATCH] Properly check for _Ci
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 12:34 PM
> To: Richard Biener; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Iyer, Balaji V
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Cilk+ ICEs in the alias oracle
>
> On 02/13/14 05:47, Richard
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:10 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: 'Jason Merrill'; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org';
> 'r...@
> > > More importantly, what is retval.1? I'd expect you should be using
> > > retval.0 there and have it also as firstprivate(retval.0) on the parallel.
> > > In *.omplower dump I actually see:
> > > retval.0 = operator- (D.2885, &i); ...
> > > retval.1 = opera
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 9:59 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: 'Jason Merrill'; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org';
> 'r...@
Hi Jakub,
Did you get a chance to look at this patch?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 5:07 PM
> To: Jakub Jelinek
> Cc: 'Jason Merrill'; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Her
Hi Jakub,
This should fix PR 59834
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59834) on i686-linux.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 6:51 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; Richard
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 9:03 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: 'Jason Merrill'; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Hernandez'
Hello Everyone,
Attached, please find a patch that will fix the issue in PR 59691. The
main issue was that the Cilk library (libcilkrts) was not checking if the
target has SSE support before emitting SSE instruction. This patch should fix
that.
Here is the ChangeLog entries:
libcilkrts/
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Orth
> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 4:22 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Jakub Jelinek; Paolo Carlini; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re:
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 2:43 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Paolo Carlini; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: regression t
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 2:25 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Paolo Carlini; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: regression test issue
>
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:08:32PM +00
Sorry, I forgot to put [PATCH] in the subject line. Is the patch below OK to
install?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 12:02 PM
> To: 'Paolo Carlini'; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: Paolo Carlini [mailto:paolo.carl...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 11:53 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: regression test issue
>
> Hi,
>
> On 02/05/2014 06:29 AM, Iyer, Balaji
Hello Everyone,
The following two Cilk Plus tests is timing out at -O1 in my x86_64 box
(-O2, -O3 and -O0 works fine). These tests were working fine till revision
r207047. Can someone please look at this? It looks like a middle-end/back-end
issue.
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: g++
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 11:26 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Issue with _Cilk_for
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 11:04 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Issue with _Cilk_for
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 04:42:57PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wr
-complete. Is the patch OK for
trunk?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 10:54 AM
> To: Jakub Jelinek
> Cc: 'Jason Merrill'; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patch
Hi Jakub,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 6:31 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: 'Jason Merrill'; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org';
> '
> -Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 4:36 PM
> To: Jakub Jelinek
> Cc: Jason Merrill; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org';
> 'r...@redhat.com'
> Subject: RE: [PING]
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 3:50 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Jason Merrill; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'g
Hi Jakub et al.,
Did you get a chance to look at this _Cilk_for patch?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 3:34 PM
Hello Jakub and Aldy,
As you both requested, this patch will replace flag_enable_cilkplus
with flag_cilkplus. I have committed this patch since the change is a
small/obvious one. Please let me know if you like me to change anything.
Here are the ChangeLog entries:
gcc/ChangeLog
+2014-01
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 2:42 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Jason Merrill; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org';
> 'r...@redhat.com'
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 5:28 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for PR 59825
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:27:58AM +0100, Jakub Jeline
Hi Jakub,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 5:13 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Jason Merrill; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Hernandez'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org';
> 'r...@red
Hi Jakub,
Did you get a chance to look at this? Is it OK to install to trunk?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 5:55 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for PR 59825
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:37:04PM +, Iyer, B
Hello Everyone,
The attached patch will fix the issue pointed out in PR 58996. The main
issue was that the runtime was not checking for the availability of pthread
affinity before calling its functions. This patch should fix that.
Here is the ChangeLog entry:
2014-01-20 Balaji V. Iyer
; From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 12:46 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: 'Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com)'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: [GOMP4][PATCH] SIMD-enabled functions (formerly Elemental
> functions) f
nd them to you.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:19 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; Jakub Jelinek
> Cc: Jason Merrill; 'Jeff Law'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'; '
Hello Everyone,
I would like to patch these two patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00408.html -- _Cilk_for
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00116.html -- SIMD enabled
functions for C++
They have been under review for a while now (~1 month)
Hello Everyone,
Attached, please find a patch that will fix PR 59825. The main issue
was array notations occurring in COMPOUND_EXPR. This patch should fix that and
fix the rank_mismatch2.c test-case ICE.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
diff --git a/gcc/c/ChangeLog
Hello Everyone,
I noticed that there was an error in the testcode in
"check_libcilkrts_available" target-supports function for C++. It was working
fine in C but needed an extern "C" along with a prototype for C++. This patch
below should fix that. This patch is committed as obvious (..m
Hello Everyone,
The following patch will fix the bug in PR 59094. The main issue was
that version specific libraries are not stored in the correct location. The
patch below should fix that. It is committed since the person who filed the bug
has confirmed that the fix works.
Index: libci
Hello Jakub,
Did you get a chance to look at this patch
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00116.html)? I think I have fixed
all the changes you requested. Is it ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
Hello Everyone,
Attached, please find a patch will fix the bug mentioned in PR 59524.
The main issue was that Cilk keywords tests are running even when the user
configured the compiler with --disable-libcilkrts. This patch should fix this
issue for C and C++. This is tested on x86 and x8
A small but major typo.
The second sentence should read "...usage of _Cilk_spawn [ and _Cilk_sync]
*without* -fcilkplus..." instead of "...with -fcilkplus..."
I am sorry about this.
Sincerely,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-----
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2014 3:41 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; 'Jeff Law'; 'Aldy Hernandez'
> Cc: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'; 'r...@redhat.com'; 'Jakub Jeline
Hello Everyone,
The attached patch will fix the issue reported in PR 59631. The main
issue was the usage of Cilk spawn [and _Cilk_sync] with -fcilkplus caused an
ICE. This patch should fix that. The issue was only reported for C++ but the
issue exists in C compiler also. This patch fixe
Hello Everyone,
Did anyone get a chance to look into this?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:51 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Jakub Jelinek
> Subject: [PING][GOMP4][PATCH] SIMD
Ping!
-Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 1:12 PM
> To: Jakub Jelinek
> Cc: 'Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com)'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: RE: [GOMP4][PATCH] SIMD-enabled fun
mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 2:23 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: 'Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com)'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: [GOMP4][PATCH] SIMD-enabled functions (formerly Elemental
> functions) for C++
>
> On W
: Called the C/C++ common tests for
SIMD enabled function.
* g++.dg/cilk-plus/ef_test.C: New test.
* c-c++-common/cilk-plus/vlength_errors.c: Added new dg-error tags
to differentiate C error messages from C++ ones.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -----Original Mess
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@zalov.cz]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 1:31 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Joseph S. Myers; Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); 'gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: [PING]: [GOMP4]
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:26 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Joseph S. Myers; Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); 'gcc-
> patc
s/SE/ef_error2.c: Likewise.
* c-c++-common/cilk-plus/SE/ef_error3.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp: Added calls for the above tests.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, Decem
nu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 5:01 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; Joseph S. Myers
> Cc: Aldy Hernandez; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (former
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 1:18 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Joseph S. Myers; Aldy Hernandez; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Fun
Hi Jakub,
I will work on this, but I need a couple clarifications about some of
your comments. Please see below:
> > +#define CILK_SIMD_FN_CLAUSE_MASK \
> > + ( (OMP_CLAUSE_MASK_1 << PRAGMA_OMP_CLAUSE_SIMDLEN)
> \
> > + | (OMP_CLAUSE_MASK_1 << PR
>
> > - return (gimple_omp_subcode (g) & GF_OMP_FOR_COMBINED) != 0;
> > + return (gimple_omp_for_kind (g) == GF_OMP_FOR_COMBINED);
>
> I don't really know this code, but this change seems unlikely to be correct.
> Can you explain it?
I really need help on this. I need a new enum type (I call t
ek
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 11:52 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Aldy Hernandez; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly
> Elemental functions) for C
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 06:37:22PM +, Iy
if so, adjust the Cilk Plus SIMD-enabled function attributes.
Gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2013-12-16 Balaji V. Iyer
* g++.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp: Called the C/C++ common tests for
SIMD enabled function.
* g++.dg/cilk-plus/ef_test.C: New test.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Aldy Hernandez
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 12:40 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Jakub Jelinek; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: R
> -Original Message-
> From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 3:29 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Jakub Jelinek; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Aldy Hernandez
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:47 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jeff Law
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable
> -Original Message-
> From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:26 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Jakub Jelinek; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly
Hello Everyone,
Since we have _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync support in C++ compiler, we
can enable the keyword usage in runtime. This patch should do so.
Is it Ok to install?
Here are the ChangeLog entries:
2013-12-11 Balaji V. Iyer
* Makefile.am (GENERAL_FLAGS): Remove
Hi Aldy,
> -Original Message-
> From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 1:27 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Jakub Jelinek; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: RE: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (fo
> -Original Message-
> From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 12:38 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: 'Jakub Jelinek'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Aldy Hernandez
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:03 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: 'Jakub Jelinek'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
>
.@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 6, 2013 6:16 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: 'Jakub Jelinek'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly
> Elemental functions) for C
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 3:20 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: 'Jakub Jelinek'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 4:00 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Jeff Law
> Subject: Re: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++
>
> On 12/04/2013 02:45
PING!
-Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 11:53 PM
> To: 'Jakub Jelinek'
> Cc: Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); 'Jeff Law'; 'gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: RE: [GOMP4
PING!
-Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 11:38 PM
> To: 'al...@redhat.com'
> Cc: 'Jakub Jelinek'; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: RE: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 5:39 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Jeff Law
> Subject: Re: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++
>
> On 12/03/2013 07:08 PM, Iyer
>
> > case CILK_SPAWN_STMT:
> > gcc_assert
> > (fn_contains_cilk_spawn_p (cfun)
> > && lang_hooks.cilkplus.cilk_detect_spawn_and_unwrap (expr_p));
> > if (!seen_error ())
> > {
> > ret = (enum gimplify_status)
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 8:40 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Jeff Law; Jason Merrill; Aldy Hernandez; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> r...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] _Cilk_for for C and C+
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 1:30 AM
> To: Jason Merrill; Iyer, Balaji V; Aldy Hernandez
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; r...@redhat.com; Jakub Jelinek
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] _Cilk_for for C and C++
>
function.
* g++.dg/cilk-plus/ef_test.C: New test.
Is this OK for branch?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:19 PM
> To: Jakub Jelinek
> Cc: Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); Jeff Law; gcc-patc
/EF/vlength_errors.c: Likewise.
* c-c++-common/cilk-plus/EF/ef_error.c: Likewise.
* c-c++-common/cilk-plus/EF/ef_error2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp: Added calls for the above tests.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> -Original Message-----
> F
-Original Message-
> From: Iyer, Balaji V
> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:16 PM
> To: Jakub Jelinek
> Cc: Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: [GOMP4] SIMD enabled function for C/C++
>
> Hello Jakub,
> I was look
Hello Jakub,
I was looking at my elemental function for C patch that I fixed up and
send as requested by Aldy, and I saw two changes there that were used for C and
C++ and they were pretty obvious. Here are the changes. Can I just commit them?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
Index: gcc/config/
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:11 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Jeff Law
> Subject: Re: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++
>
> On 11/27/2013 11:05 PM, Iyer, Balaj
> -Original Message-
> From: Lu, Hongjiu
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:06 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Iyer, Balaji V
> Subject: PATCH: PR c/59309: FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-
> plus/CK/spawnee_inline.c -g -fcilkplus (test for excess errors)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:11 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Jeff Law
> Subject: Re: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++
>
> On 11/27/2013 11:05 PM, Iyer, Balaj
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:24 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Jeff Law
> Subject: Re: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++
>
> On 11/27/2013 05:59 PM, Iyer, Bala
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 2:43 PM
> To: Jason Merrill; Iyer, Balaji V; Aldy Hernandez
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; r...@redhat.com; Jakub Jelinek
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] _Cilk_for for C and C++
&
1 - 100 of 377 matches
Mail list logo
