-05-11 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/108007
* cgraph.h (cgraph_edge): Add a parameter to
redirect_call_stmt_to_callee.
* ipa-param-manipulation.h (ipa_param_adjustments): Added a
parameter to modify_call.
* cgraph.cc (cgraph_edge::redirect_call_stmt_to_callee
Hello,
On Wed, May 10 2023, Eugene Rozenfeld via Gcc-patches wrote:
> autoprofiledbootstrap build produces new warnings since inlining decisions
> are different from other builds. This patch contains fixes and workarounds
> for those warnings.
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 26 2023, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * ipa-cp.cc (ipa_vr_operation_and_type_effects): Convert to ranger API.
> (ipa_value_range_from_jfunc): Same.
> (propagate_vr_across_jump_function): Same.
> * ipa-fnsummary.cc
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 27 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
> The following addresses IPA param manipulation (through IPA SRA)
> replacing
>
> BIT_FIELD_REF <*this_8(D), 8, 56>
>
> with
>
> BIT_FIELD_REF (ISRA.814), 8,
> 56>
>
> which is supposed to be invalid GIMPLE (ISRA.814 is a register).
> There's
and
testing and LTO bootstrap on an x86_64. I will commit it to master
after rebasing in a few moments (and then to the gcc-12 branch in a week
or so).
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2023-04-14 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/107769
PR ipa/109318
* cgraph.h (symtab_node
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 31 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:46 AM Martin Jambor wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are in the process of changing data structures holding information
>> about constants passed by reference and in aggregates to use un
,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2023-03-30 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/109303
* ipa-prop.cc (determine_known_aggregate_parts): Check that the
offset + size will be representable in unsigned int.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2023-03-30 Jakub Jelinek
Martin Jambor
PR
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 08 2023, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 3/8/23 11:15, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 3/8/23 10:53, Jan Hubicka wrote:
[...]
>>> We have n->reset () for that which is used in similar situation when
>>> frontends overwrites extern inline function by its different offline
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 22 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 8:25 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> is the following item documenting that gcc13 can generate code for Zen 4
>> OK for the changes.html file on the web?
>
>
so removes IPA value range and
bits information associated with removed parameters stored in the same
structure so that the useless information is not streamed later on.
Bootstrapped and LTO-bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for
trunk?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2023-03-22 Mar
Hello,
is the following item documenting that gcc13 can generate code for Zen 4
OK for the changes.html file on the web?
Thanks,
Martin
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html
index 4fae1f7a..f8e9560c 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html
+++
Hello,
I'd like to ping the patch below.
Martin
On Tue, Feb 21 2023, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking into the behavior of profile count updating in PR 107925, I
> noticed that an option not considered possible was actually happening,
> and - with the guesswork in plac
Hello,
I'd like to ping the patch below.
Martin
On Tue, Feb 21 2023, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the patch below fixes various issues in function
> update_specialized_profile. The main is removal of the assert which
> is bogus in the case of recursive cloning
once stage1 opens up? Or perhaps even now?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2023-02-20 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/107925
* ipa-cp.cc (update_profiling_info): Drop counts of orig_node to
global0 instead of zeroing when it does not have as many counts as
it should
with the subsequent patch on an x86_64-linux. OK for
master and the 12 branch - assuming it is also affected?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2023-02-17 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/107925
* ipa-cp.cc (update_specialized_profile): Drop orig_node_count to
ipa count, remove assert
for
master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2023-02-13 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/108679
* ipa-sra.cc (push_param_adjustments_for_index): Do not omit
creation of non-scalar replacements even if IPA-CP knows their
contents.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2023-02-13 Martin
ing as an obvious
fix.
Martin
A fix to a typo spotted by Bernhard Reutner-Fischer. Tested by
building the compiler with the fix.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2023-02-06 Martin Jambor
* ipa-sra.cc (adjust_parameter_descriptions): Fix a typo in a dump.
---
gcc/ipa-sra.cc | 4 ++--
1 file changed
On Fri, Feb 03 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 5:20 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when the compiled program contains type mismatches between callers and
>> callees when it comes to a parameter, IPA-CP can try to propagate one
>&
-CP and when it sees a value on the same
offset but with a mismatching size, it just decides to leave that
particular parameter be.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux, OK for master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2023-02-02 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/108384
* ipa-sra.cc
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 20 2022, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Am 20.10.2022 um 14:41 schrieb Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
>> :
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:33:28PM +, Michael Matz wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
This had been
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 02 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> If -w is used, warn_odr properly sets *warned = false and
> so it should be preserved when calling warn_types_mismatch.
>
> Noticed that during a LTO reduction where I used -w.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression
On Tue, Jan 24 2023, Martin Liška wrote:
> We should not insert an empty value to the container.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed?
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
> PR ipa/108509
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * cgraphunit.cc
c/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2023-01-18 Martin Jambor
>>
>> PR ipa/107944
>> * cgraph.cc (cgraph_node::remove): Check whether nodes up the
>> lcone_of chain also do not need the body.
>> ---
>> gcc/cgraph.cc | 14 --
>> 1 fi
elease_body do nothing when called on a clone.
>> I guess it makes sense to keep your approach but please add sanity check
>> to release_body that clone_of == NULL with a comment.
>
> I do support Martin's enhanced version of the patch.
>
I take that as an approval, so I am abou
Hello,
sorry for getting to this quite late. I have only had a quick glance at
ipa-cp.cc hunks so far.
On Fri, Dec 16 2022, Manolis Tsamis wrote:
> The IPA CP pass offers a wide range of optimizations, where most of them
> lead to specialized functions that are called from a call site.
> This
Hi,
sorry for getting to this so late.
On Thu, Dec 01 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Noticed during building of libbackend.a with the LTO partial linking.
The testcase is areally nice one, too bad it's probably impossible to
get it small enough to be included in the testcase. But it also
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 06 2023, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi Martin
>
>> + key.unit_offset = unit_offset;
>> + ipa_param_body_replacement *res
>> += std::lower_bound (m_replacements.begin (), m_replacements.end (), key,
>> +[] (const ipa_param_body_replacement ,
>> +
gcc/ChangeLog:
2023-01-04 Martin Jambor
* ipa-param-manipulation.h (ipa_param_body_adjustments): New members
sort_replacements, lookup_first_base_replacement and
m_sorted_replacements_p.
* ipa-param-manipulation.cc: Define INCLUDE_ALGORITHM
right
now. OK if it passes?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-12-14 Martin Jambor
* ipa-sra.cc (create_parameter_descriptors): Consider the first
parameter of a method safe to dereference.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2022-12-14 Martin Jambor
* g++.dg/ipa/ipa-sra
-linux right
now. OK if it passes?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-12-14 Martin Jambor
* ipa-sra.cc (loaded_decls): Adjust comment.
(scan_expr_access): Also detect assignments of address of local
variables to a variable. Bail out early on SSA_NAMEs
hould say. I'll fix that momentarily with the following patch.
Thanks again,
Martin
Somehow I made the description of the parameter almost the opposite of
what I wanted to say. Fixed by this patch.
Tested by building gcc on x86_64-linux and make info and make pdf.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-12-1
only
>> > > interested in memory accesses. So bail out when the expression is
>> > > something clearly uninteresting.
>> > >
>> > > Bootstrapped and tested individually when I originally posted it and
>> > > now bootstrapped and LTO-bootstrapped and tested a
expressions. The new testcase is basically a copy
>> of it with different options and IPA-SRA dump scans.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested individually when I originally posted it and
>> now bootstrapped and LTO-bootstrapped and tested as part of the whole
>> series. OK
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 12 2022, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
[...]
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
>>
>> PR ipa/103585
>> * ipa-sra.c (struct gensum_param_access): New field load_count.
>> (struct gensum_pa
ply alters the IPA-CP not to do that in the situations
where IPA-SRA can (for nodes which can be made local) with additional
dumping requested by Honza.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-12-13 Martin Jambor
* ipa-cp.cc (clone_for_param_removal_p): New function.
(estimate_local_effects): Call it be
OK for master?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
* ipa-sra.cc (isra_param_desc): New fields safe_size,
conditionally_dereferenceable and safe_size_set.
(struct gensum_param_desc): New field conditionally_dereferenceable.
(struct isra_param_flow): Updated comm
n I originally posted it and
now bootstrapped and LTO-bootstrapped and tested as part of the whole
series. OK for master?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
* ipa-param-manipulation.cc
(ipa_param_body_adjustments::modify_expression): Bail out ea
-12-14 Martin Jambor
* ipa-sra.c (scan_expr_access): Bail out early if expr is something we
clearly do not need to pass to get_ref_base_and_extent.
---
gcc/ipa-sra.cc | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-sra.cc b/gcc/ipa-sra.cc
index 93fceeaf
new testcase is basically a copy
of it with different options and IPA-SRA dump scans.
Bootstrapped and tested individually when I originally posted it and
now bootstrapped and LTO-bootstrapped and tested as part of the whole
series. OK for master?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
*
ple of FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT macros with
C++11 style iteration.
Bootstrapped and tested individually when I originally posted it and
now bootstrapped and LTO-bootstrapped and tested as part of the whole
series. OK for master?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
* ipa-sra.c (ipa_sra_analysis): M
-11 Martin Jambor
* ipa-cp.cc (estimate_local_effects): Do not clone potentionally local
nodes for all contexts just to remove unused parameters.
---
gcc/ipa-cp.cc | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-cp.cc b/gcc/ipa-cp.cc
index cc031ebe
ped and tested as part of the whole
series. OK for master?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/103585
* ipa-sra.c (struct gensum_param_access): New field load_count.
(struct gensum_param_desc): New field safe_ref, adjusted comments.
(by_ref_co
ite/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/103227
PR ipa/107640
* gcc.dg/ipa/pr107640-2.c: New test.
---
gcc/ipa-param-manipulation.cc | 155 --
gcc/ipa-param-manipulation.h | 19 ++--
gcc/ipa-prop.cc |
ing the streaming, I also simplified it a little a
converted it writing to nicer C++ vector iterations.
Bootstrapped and LTO-bootstrapped on x86_64-linux. OK for master?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-25 Martin Jambor
* ipa-prop.cc (useful_ipcp_transformation_info_p): New funct
also simplified it a little a
>> converted it writing to nicer C++ vector iterations.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for master?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2022-11-11 Martin J
and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for
trunk?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-22 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/107661
* ipa-cp.cc (push_agg_values_from_edge): New parameter
optimize_self_recursion, use it to decide whether to pass interim to
the helper function
On Sat, Nov 12 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When building vectors of known aggregate values, there is no point in
> including those for parameters which are not used in any way
> whatsoever.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for master?
>
> Thanks,
on x86_64-linux. OK for master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
* ipa-sra.cc (isra_param_desc): New fields safe_size,
conditionally_dereferenceable and safe_size_set.
(struct gensum_param_desc): New field conditionally_dereferenceable
otherwise removed
parameters that need to be removed from the statements too.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
* ipa-param-manipulation.cc
(ipa_param_body_adjustments::modify_expression): Bail out
,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2021-12-14 Martin Jambor
* ipa-sra.c (scan_expr_access): Bail out early if expr is something we
clearly do not need to pass to get_ref_base_and_extent.
---
gcc/ipa-sra.cc | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-sra.cc b/gcc
this change to test ir independently and make those
subsequent patches cleaner.
While at it, I also replaced couple of FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT macros with
C++11 style iteration.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
invocations.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/103585
* ipa-sra.c (struct gensum_param_access): New field load_count.
(struct gensum_param_desc): New field safe_ref, adjusted
-11 Martin Jambor
* ipa-sra.c (isra_param_desc): New field not_specially_constructed.
(struct isra_param_flow): New field constructed_for_calls.
(isra_call_summary::dump): Dump the new flag.
(loaded_decls): New variable.
(dump_isra_param_descriptor): New
dump them, which makes the dumops quite
incomplete. This patch fixes that.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2021-12-14 Martin Jambor
* ipa-sra.c (ipa_sra_dump_all_summaries): Dump edge summaries even
for non-candidates
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
* ipa-cp.cc (estimate_local_effects): Do not clone potentionally local
nodes for all contexts just to remove unused parameters.
---
gcc/ipa-cp.cc | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-cp.cc b
parameters.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/103227
* ipa-param-manipulation.h (class ipa_param_adjustments): Removed
member function get_updated_index_or_split.
(class
:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
* ipa-prop.cc (useful_ipcp_transformation_info_p): New function.
(write_ipcp_transformation_info): Added a parameter, simplified
given that is known not to be NULL.
(ipcp_write_transformation_summaries): Write out all useful
Hi,
When building vectors of known aggregate values, there is no point in
including those for parameters which are not used in any way
whatsoever.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-11 Martin Jambor
* ipa-cp.cc
for master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-11-10 Martin Jambor
* ipa-param-manipulation.cc
(ipa_param_body_adjustments::common_initialization): Do not set
m_split_modifications_p.
(ipa_param_body_adjustments::ipa_param_body_adjustments): Remove
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26 2022, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> When upgrading TLS access model based on optimized symbol visibility
> status, we attempted to assert that recomputing the model would not
> weaken it. It turns out that C, C++, and Fortran front-ends all can
> (unintentionally) assign a
already approved the patch (without the testcase) in Bugzilla,
so I plan to commit it after bootstrapping and testing it on an x86_64
(on top of a more recent trunk than last week).
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-10-18 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimization/107206
* tree-sra.cc
Hi,
thanks for the review.
On Fri, Oct 14 2022, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
[...]
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2022-08-15 Martin Jambor
>>
>> * gcc.dg/ipa/ipcp-agg-11.c: Adjust dumps.
>> * gcc.dg/ipa/
(int n, char m[1][n]);
>>>
>>> int foo (int n, char m[1][n]) {}
>>>
>>> no longer compiles with an error about different function types.
>>
>> Note in discussion with IPA folks we agreed that IPA cloning that modifies
>> arguments either has to re
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 30 2022, Alexander Monakov wrote:
>> I see, thank you for explaining the issue, and sorry if I was a bit stubborn.
>>
>> Does the attached patch (incremental change below) look better? It no longer
>> has the 'shortcut' where iterating over referrers is avoided for the common
>>
sted on x86_64-linux (and a
slightly older version also on aarch64-linux). LTO-profiledbootstrap is
currently underway. Given the size of the patch I assume there will be
concerns/questions but I'm looking for an approval to commit a version
of this.
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-08-26 Martin Jambor
* ipa-prop.h (IPA_PROP_ARG_INDEX_LIMIT_BITS): New.
(ipcp_transformation): Added forward declaration.
(ipa_argagg_value): New type.
(ipa_argagg_value_list): New type.
(ipa_agg_replacement_value): Removed type.
On Fri, Aug 26 2022, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
>> > +/* Check if promoting general-dynamic TLS access model to local-dynamic is
>> > + desirable for DECL. */
>> > +
>> > +static bool
>>
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 27 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Am 26.08.2022 um 23:45 schrieb Martin Jambor :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 26 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> Richard Biener writes:
>>>>> Am 26.08.2022 um 18:40 schrieb Martin
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 29 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 29 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>&
Hi again,
On Mon, Aug 29 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 26 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> Am 26.08.2022 um 18:39 schrieb Martin Jambor :
>> >>
>> >>
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 29 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 26 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> Am 26.08.2022 um 18:39 schrieb Martin Jambor :
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 26 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>>> Am 26.08.2022 um 18:40 schrieb Martin Jambor :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This adds a method to binary search in a sorted array_slice.
>>>
>>> The impleme
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 26 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Am 26.08.2022 um 18:40 schrieb Martin Jambor :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This adds a method to binary search in a sorted array_slice.
>>
>> The implementation is direct copy of vec:bsearch. Moreover, to
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 26 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Am 26.08.2022 um 18:39 schrieb Martin Jambor :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch adds constructors of array_slice that are required to
>> create them from non-const (heap or auto) vectors or from GC vectors.
>
but I'll be happy to change that if
not.
Bootstrapped and tested along code that actually uses it on
x86_64-linux. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-08-08 Martin Jambor
* vec.h (array_slice::bsearch): New methods.
---
gcc/vec.h | 94
to having read-only array_slices.
But I do need the constructor from the gc vector.
Bootstrapped and tested along code that actually uses it on
x86_64-linux. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-08-08 Martin Jambor
* vec.h (array_slice): Add constructors for non-const
Hi,
sorry for ignoring this for so long, I hope that Honza wold take over.
I think the patch would be good if it did not have
On Thu, Jul 07 2022, Alexander Monakov via Gcc-patches wrote:
> From: Artem Klimov
>
> Fix PR99619, which asks to optimize TLS model based on visibility.
> The fix
Hello,
I have one more question/comment about array_slice. Ever since I
started to use it...
On Fri, Nov 13 2020, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
> A later patch wants to be able to pass around subarray views of an
> existing array. The standard class to do that is std::span, but it's
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Nov 13 2020, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
> A later patch wants to be able to pass around subarray views of an
> existing array. The standard class to do that is std::span, but it's
> a C++20 thing. This patch just adds a cut-down version of it.
thanks a lot for
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 23 2022, Xionghu Luo via Gcc-patches wrote:
> There is a corner case for speculative multiple targets, that if speculative
> edges are streamed to different ltrans units, and then edges are expanded
> in one ltrans unit but the speculative property is not cleared by
>
e,
>> thus avoiding both the assert trigger and the verification failure.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for master and then all
>> active release branches?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 14 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:06 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> with -fno-toplevel-reorder (and -fwhole-program), there apparently can
>> be local functions without any callers.
>
> Did you che
for master and then all
active release branches?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-07-13 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/106260
* ipa-cp.cc (initialize_node_lattices): Replace assert that there are
callers with handling that situation when -fno-toplevel_reorder.
gcc
inal intent.
I hope the fix is obvious enough (and it is only a testsuite change)
that I can commit it myself.
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2022-07-08 Martin Jambor
PR testsuite/106216
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/alias-access-path-13.c (union foo): Replace a long
int
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 04 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As the testcase in PR 105860 shows, the code that tries to re-use the
>> handled_component chains in SRA can be horribly confused by unions,
>> where
does (and the extra testcase verifies).
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for trunk and then for
release branches?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-07-01 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimization/105860
* tree-sra.cc (build_reconstructed_reference): Start expr
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 10 2022, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> this patch prevents ipa-prop from propagating aggregates when load is
> volatile. Martin, does this look OK? It seem to me that ipa-prop may
> need some additional volatile flag checks.
load_from_unmodified_param_or_agg checks for it,
Hi,
On Fri, May 27 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 4:47 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> PR 105639 shows that code with type-mismatches can trigger an assert
>> after runnning into a branch that was inteded only for refere
on x86_64. OK for trunk and then gcc 12?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-05-25 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/105639
* ipa-prop.cc (propagate_controlled_uses): Check type of the
constant before adding a LOAD reference.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2022-05-25 Martin Jambor
Hello,
On Sun, Apr 17 2022, Artem Klimov via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Fix issue PR99619, which asks to optimize TLS access based on
> visibility. The fix is implemented as an IPA optimization, which allows
> to take optimized visibility status into account (as well as avoid
> modifying all language
12 to
branch and only backport to 12.2 after some time on GCC 13 master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-04-27 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/100413
* cgraph.cc (cgraph_node::remove): Release body of the node this
is clone_of if appropriate.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2022
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 20 2022, Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
[...]
>> >
>> >if ((flag_openacc || flag_openmp)
>> >&& lookup_attribute ("omp declare target", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl)))
>> > --- gcc/cgraphclones.cc.jj 2022-01-18
d
platform is welcomed to do so.
OK for master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2022-04-08 Martin Jambor
PR testsuite/105183
* gcc.dg/ipa/remref-7.c: Add --param max-inline-insns-auto=100 to
options.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/remref-7.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 inser
Hi,
thanks for a very quick reply.
On Fri, Apr 01 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> PRs 68930 and 92497 show that when IPA-CP figures out constants in
>> aggregate parameters or when passed by reference but the
after
IPA but before FRE - which are not many but there is a ccp and fwprop
pass among others. For simple testcases like
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipcp-agg-*.c, it makes not assembly difference
at all.
What do you think?
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-03-30 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/68930
the transform when the SSA_NAME to be
replaced is a default definition.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2020-10-19 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimization/97456
PR middle-end/105071
* tree-complex.c (set_component_ssa_name): Do not replace ignored decl
default definitions with new component
Hello,
I would like to ping this patch, please.
Thanks,
Martin
On Fri, Jan 28 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in r12-2523-g13586172d0b70c ipa-prop tracking of jump functions during
> inlining got the ability to remove ADDR references when inlining
> discovered that they wer
Hello,
I would like to ping this patch, please.
Thanks,
Martin
On Mon, Feb 14 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello Honza,
>
> On Mon, Dec 13 2021, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>> >>> + || (only_for_nonzero &&
>>>
Hello,
I would like to ping this patch, please.
Thanks,
Martin
On Mon, Feb 14 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PR 102513 shows we emit bogus array access warnings when IPA-CP
> creates clones specialized for values which it deduces from arithmetic
> jump functions
Hello,
just one question
On Tue, Mar 15 2022, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> Most microprocessors have efficient ways to perform CRC operations, be
> that with lookup tables, rotates, or even special instructions.
> However, because we lack a representation for CRC in the compiler, we
> can't do
101 - 200 of 1587 matches
Mail list logo