Hello,
May I have a review from the DWARF, the ARM and RS6000 maintainers for
comments/approval ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01613.html
Needed to fix the powerpc-spe bootstrap referenced in bugzilla #57389
Many Thanks
Christian
Christian Bruel wrote:
>> However I feel a li
Christian Bruel wrote:
> However I feel a little bit uncomfortable with this solution that
> doesn't seem to fix the root cause. The dbx_register_number hooks is
> called basically from two places : dwarf2cfi.c and dwarf2out.c. That
> show different uses: either we want to refer to the hard regno
On 05/16/2013 12:27 AM, Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> How about using dbx_reg_number (XVECEXP (regs, 0, i)) instead? The
>>> bare use of DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER earlier in that function is protected
>>> by a gcc_assert, but this one isn't.
>>
For the respective targets maintainers that drop into the thread:
Yes, this looks good. OK for trunk, but please add a note about those
additional changes you made to the ChangeLog entry. Thanks!
Thanks, done with this entry:
2013-05-21 Christian Bruel
* dwarf2out.c (multiple_reg_loc_descriptor): Use dbx_reg_number for
spanning register
> > How about using dbx_reg_number (XVECEXP (regs, 0, i)) instead? The
> > bare use of DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER earlier in that function is protected
> > by a gcc_assert, but this one isn't.
>
> OK dbx_reg_number better than DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER here.
> while we are on it, it looks like the spanning ca
Hello,
On 04/30/2013 09:05 PM, Cary Coutant wrote
>
> How about using dbx_reg_number (XVECEXP (regs, 0, i)) instead? The
> bare use of DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER earlier in that function is protected
> by a gcc_assert, but this one isn't.
OK dbx_reg_number better than DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER here.
while w
2013-04-26 Christian Bruel
* dwarf2out.c (multiple_reg_loc_descriptor): Use DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER
for spaning registers.
s/spaning/spanning/
Index: dwarf2out.c
===
--- dwarf2out.c (revision 198287)
+++ dwarf2out.c
Hello,
We noticed a few failures with the gdb testsuite due to incorrect
mapping of floating point, noticed on SH that defines both
TARGET_DWARF_REGISTER_SPAN and DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER.
The problem was that the converted pseudo reg was never converted to the
dbx format when fed from 'multiple_reg_l
