Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

On 10/21/15 13:16, Nathan Sidwell wrote: On 10/21/15 16:14, Ilya Verbin wrote: <11-trunk-tests.patch> Does the testcase with offload IR appear here accidentally? D'oh! yup, fixed. Now all applied, Thanks for everybody's help. nathan

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

On 10/23/2015 01:29 PM, Cesar Philippidis wrote: > On 10/22/2015 08:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:47:01AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote: But it is unclear from the parsing what from these is allowed: >>> >>> int v, w; >>> ... >>> gang(26) // equivalent to

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

On 10/22/2015 08:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:47:01AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote: >>> But it is unclear from the parsing what from these is allowed: >> >> int v, w; >> ... >> gang(26) // equivalent to gang(num:26) >> gang(v) // gang(num:v) >> vector(length: 16)

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 03:53:17PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > This patch has some new execution tests, verifying loop partitioning is > behaving as expected. > > There are more execution tests on the gomp4 branch, but many of them use > reductions. We'll merge those once reductions are

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 09:53:46AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 10/22/15 05:37, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > >And, I must say I'm at least missing testcases that check parsing but also > >runtime behavior of the vector or worker clause arguments (there > >is one gang (static:1) clause, but not

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

On 10/22/15 10:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 09:53:46AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: On 10/22/15 05:37, Jakub Jelinek wrote: And, I must say I'm at least missing testcases that check parsing but also runtime behavior of the vector or worker clause arguments (there is one

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

On 10/22/2015 07:23 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 10/22/15 10:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 09:53:46AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >>> On 10/22/15 05:37, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>> And, I must say I'm at least missing testcases that check parsing but also

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

On 10/22/15 10:47, Cesar Philippidis wrote: Interesting question. The spec is unclear. It defines gang, worker and vector as follows in section 2.7 in the OpenACC 2.0a spec: gang [( gang-arg-list )] worker [( [num:] int-expr )] vector [( [length:] int-expr )] where gang-arg is one

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:47:01AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote: > > But it is unclear from the parsing what from these is allowed: > > int v, w; > ... > gang(26) // equivalent to gang(num:26) > gang(v) // gang(num:v) > vector(length: 16) // vector(length: 16) > vector(length: v) //

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

On 10/22/15 05:37, Jakub Jelinek wrote: And, I must say I'm at least missing testcases that check parsing but also runtime behavior of the vector or worker clause arguments (there is one gang (static:1) clause, but not the other clauses nor other styles of gang arguments. the static clause is

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

On 10/22/2015 08:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:47:01AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote: >>> But it is unclear from the parsing what from these is allowed: >> >> int v, w; >> ... >> gang(26) // equivalent to gang(num:26) >> gang(v) // gang(num:v) >> vector(length: 16)

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

> On 21 Oct 2015, at 22:53, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > This patch has some new execution tests, verifying loop partitioning is > behaving as expected. > > There are more execution tests on the gomp4 branch, but many of them use > reductions. We'll merge those once reductions

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

On 10/21/15 16:14, Ilya Verbin wrote: <11-trunk-tests.patch> Does the testcase with offload IR appear here accidentally? D'oh! yup, fixed. nathan 2015-10-20 Nathan Sidwell * testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-g-1.c: New. *

Re: [OpenACC 11/11] execution tests

This patch has some new execution tests, verifying loop partitioning is behaving as expected. There are more execution tests on the gomp4 branch, but many of them use reductions. We'll merge those once reductions are merged. nathan 2015-10-20 Nathan Sidwell *