Hi,
On 10/03/2012 11:57 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote:
Testing was done before posting the patch. It was successful.
This change is now in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00418.html
and it looks like is breaking the build for me:
build/genattrtab
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:29:04PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 10/03/2012 11:57 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote:
Testing was done before posting the patch. It was successful.
This change is now in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00418.html
and it looks like is
Hi,
On 10/10/2012 12:53 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Yeah, clearly a different version of the patch has been posted
vs. what has been checked in. The difference is removal of the
(define_cpu_unit bdver1-mult bdver1_mult)
line (present in the posted patch, not in the checked in patch).
Also, the
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:57:09PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/10/2012 12:53 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Yeah, clearly a different version of the patch has been posted
vs. what has been checked in. The difference is removal of the
(define_cpu_unit bdver1-mult bdver1_mult)
line (present in
...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, i386]: Fix PR51109, symbol size in scheduler state machine
is reduced
On 10/10/2012 01:00 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I have removed the extra line as obvious in SVN, to allow my
bootstraps to continue.
Thanks!
Paolo.
, symbol size in scheduler state machine
is reduced
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
ganesh.gopalasubraman...@amd.com wrote:
This is a fix for PR 51109.
There are three changes
1. Microcoded instructions are considered as single issue instructions
Hi All,
This is a fix for PR 51109.
There are three changes
1. Microcoded instructions are considered as single issue instructions and
are therefore issued to a separate execution unit.
2. The multiplier unit is attached to execution unit 1 (ieu1). Since ieu
is handled as a separate
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
ganesh.gopalasubraman...@amd.com wrote:
This is a fix for PR 51109.
There are three changes
1. Microcoded instructions are considered as single issue instructions
and are therefore issued to a separate execution unit.
2.
