ok to commit.
kenny
On 04/28/2014 11:42 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
With that patch bootstrap now still fails at dwarf2out.c with the same
message. I'm attaching a gzipped dwarf2out.ii
Thanks. This is a nice proof of why clz_zero and ctz_zero were as bogus
as claimed.
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
> With that patch bootstrap now still fails at dwarf2out.c with the same
> message. I'm attaching a gzipped dwarf2out.ii
Thanks. This is a nice proof of why clz_zero and ctz_zero were as bogus
as claimed. It meant that the behaviour of floor_log2 depended on the
target an
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
> The attached patch allowed the build to proceed for me, but in stage 2 I
> encountered an ICE:
>
> $TOP/gcc/dwarf2out.c: In function 'long unsigned int
> _ZL11size_of_dieP10die_struct.isra.209(vec**, long
> unsigned int)':
> $TOP/gcc/dwarf2out.c:7820:1: internal compile
On 04/23/2014 10:36 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
wrote:
On 04/23/2014 05:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Apr 22, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
Ping.
http://
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 04:36:23PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I should point out that there is a community that wants to go in the
> > opposite direction here. They are the people with real 32 bit hosts who
> > want to go back to a world where they are allowed to make hwi a 32 bit
> > value
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 05:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 22, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
>
> Ping.
> http://gcc.g
On 04/23/2014 05:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Apr 22, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00769.html
Any ideas? I recall chatter on IRC that we want to mer
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Kyrill Tkachov writes:
>>> Ping.
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00769.html
>>> Any ideas? I recall chatter on IRC that we want to merge wide-int into trunk
>>> soon.
On Apr 22, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Kyrill Tkachov writes:
>> Ping.
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00769.html
>> Any ideas? I recall chatter on IRC that we want to merge wide-int into trunk
>> soon. Bootstrap failure on arm would prevent that...
>
> Sorry f
On Apr 15, 2014, at 4:03 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> I tried bootstrapping the wide-int branch on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and
> encountered some syntax errors while building wide-int.h and wide-int.cc in
> expressions that tried to cast to HOST_WIDE_INT.
Thanks, nice catch.
> Also, in c-ada-s
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
> Ping.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00769.html
> Any ideas? I recall chatter on IRC that we want to merge wide-int into trunk
> soon. Bootstrap failure on arm would prevent that...
Sorry for the late reply. I hadn't forgotten, but I wanted to wait
until
Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00769.html
Any ideas? I recall chatter on IRC that we want to merge wide-int into trunk
soon. Bootstrap failure on arm would prevent that...
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 15/04/14 12:03, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all (and wide-int maintainers in particula
Hi all (and wide-int maintainers in particular),
I tried bootstrapping the wide-int branch on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and
encountered some syntax errors while building wide-int.h and wide-int.cc in
expressions that tried to cast to HOST_WIDE_INT. This patch fixes those errors.
Also, in c-ada-
13 matches
Mail list logo
