On 3/16/21 3:08 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/15/21 9:57 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Any plans to integrate it into the testsuite? (That way we presumably
wouldn't need to remember to run it by hand.)
Likely not, I'm not so big friend with DejaGNU.
Are you willing to help me with that?
I'm not a
On 3/15/21 9:57 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Any plans to integrate it into the testsuite? (That way we presumably
wouldn't need to remember to run it by hand.)
Likely not, I'm not so big friend with DejaGNU.
Are you willing to help me with that?
Thanks,
Martin
On 3/12/21 7:02 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/12/21 2:56 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 09:45 +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
Identified by my check that compares documentation of params
with content of --help=param output.
Pushed as obvious.
Martin
Thanks.
Which check is this, BT
On 3/12/21 2:56 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 09:45 +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
Identified by my check that compares documentation of params
with content of --help=param output.
Pushed as obvious.
Martin
Thanks.
Which check is this, BTW? (presumably this is something I shoul
On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 09:45 +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> Identified by my check that compares documentation of params
> with content of --help=param output.
>
> Pushed as obvious.
> Martin
Thanks.
Which check is this, BTW? (presumably this is something I should add
to my patch testing workflow)
Identified by my check that compares documentation of params
with content of --help=param output.
Pushed as obvious.
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/invoke.texi: Add missing param documentation.
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.
