On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 02/17/2016 02:18 PM, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > > > FYI. This causes gfc_add_interface_mapping in fortrant/trans-expr.c to
> >
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On 02/17/2016 02:18 PM, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> > > FYI. This causes gfc_add_interface_mapping in fortrant/trans-expr.c to
> > > be miscompiled for aarch64-linux-gnu. I am still debuggin
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:45:16PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On 02/17/2016 02:18 PM, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> >>FYI. This causes gfc_add_interface_mapping in fortrant/trans-expr.c to
> >>be miscompiled for aarch64-linux-gnu. I am
On 02/17/2016 02:18 PM, Daniel Gutson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
FYI. This causes gfc_add_interface_mapping in fortrant/trans-expr.c to
be miscompiled for aarch64-linux-gnu. I am still debugging it and
trying to get a smaller testcase.
Hello,
is the
f (bf_access_candidate_p (ref, &off))
>> + {
>> + bfcopy *cc = NULL;
>> + bitfield_stmt_bfcopy_pair st_cpy (stmt, NULL);
>> + bitfield_stmt_bfcopy_pair *p_st_cpy;
>> + unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT mrg_off;
>> +
id (void)
> return next_value_id++;
> }
>
> -
> -/* Compare two expressions E1 and E2 and return true if they are equal. */
> -
> -bool
> -expressions_equal_p (tree e1, tree e2)
> -{
> - /* The obvious case. */
> - if (e1 == e2)
> -return true;
> -
P
but it can be used multiple times
@@ -4184,6 +4185,11 @@ inlined_function_outer_scope_p (const_tree block)
(TREE = function_args_iter_cond (&(ITER))) != NULL_TREE;
\
function_args_iter_next (&(ITER)))
+
+/* In dwarf2out.c. */
+HOST_WIDE_INT
+f
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Zoran Jovanovic
wrote:
> Hello,
> Updated doc/invoke.texi by stating that new option is enabled by default at
> -O2 and higher.
> Also, -fmerge-bitfields added to the list of optimization flags enabled by
> default at -O2 and higher.
With this patch applied g
Hello,
Updated doc/invoke.texi by stating that new option is enabled by default at -O2
and higher.
Also, -fmerge-bitfields added to the list of optimization flags enabled by
default at -O2 and higher.
Regards,
Zoran Jovanovic
--
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:59:16 +
Zoran Jovanovic wrote:
> --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> @@ -7789,6 +7789,11 @@ pointer alignment information.
> This pass only operates on local scalar variables and is enabled by default
> at @option{-O} and higher. It requires that
: Re: [PATCH] Add a new option "-fmerge-bitfields" (patch / doc inside)
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Zoran Jovanovic
wrote:
> Hello,
> This is new patch version.
> Lowering is applied only for bit-fields copy sequences that are merged.
> Data structure representing bit-f
Hello,
My apologies for inconvenience.
Removed every appearance of -ftree-bitfield-merge from the patch and fixed an
issue with unions.
The rest of the patch is the same as before.
Regards,
Zoran Jovanovic
--
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Zoran Jovanovic
wrote:
> Hello,
> This is new patch version.
> Lowering is applied only for bit-fields copy sequences that are merged.
> Data structure representing bit-field copy sequences is renamed and reduced
> in size.
> Optimization turned on by default for
On 16 April 2014 13:38, Zoran Jovanovic wrote:
> Hello,
> This is new patch version.
The comment from the previous iteration still holds true:
> +@item -fbitfield-merge
you are talking about '-fmerge-bitfields' up until here.
Please fix all occurances of "bitfield-merge", both in the docs as we
Hello,
This is new patch version.
Lowering is applied only for bit-fields copy sequences that are merged.
Data structure representing bit-field copy sequences is renamed and reduced in
size.
Optimization turned on by default for -O2 and higher.
Some comments fixed.
Benchmarking performed on WebK
15 matches
Mail list logo
